Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent ; 34(4): 331-40, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27681396

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A common strategy to correct Class II malocclusions using a nonextraction protocol in children is to move the maxillary molars distally using molar distalization appliances, which usually derive their anchorage from maxillary premolars, causing mesialization of premolars and protrusion of incisors. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes produced by three different distalizing appliances, namely, pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet appliances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six children of mean age 14.13 years requiring molar distalization were divided into three groups: Group I (pendulum appliance), Group II (K-loop), and Group III (distal jet). Lateral cephalometric films were taken before and after 5 months of molar distalization and following cephalometric parameters were used to assess the effects of maxillary molar distalization, namely, anteroposterior skeletal (SNA/SNB/ANB), vertical skeletal (face height ratio/Frankfort-mandibular plane [FMA]/angle formed between Maxillary plane & Mandibular plane (MM)), interdental (overjet/overbite), maxillary dentoalveolar, and soft tissue parameters. RESULTS: There was no significant age difference between the three groups. In overall treatment changes among the three groups, the Anteroposterior skeletal changes were not statistically significant, vertically FMA angle increased by 1.79° ± 2.25° and overbite reduced by 2.38 ± 1.83 mm. The maxillary first molars were distalized by an average of 4.70 ± 3.01 mm (Upper 6 [U6] to pterygoid vertical [PTV]). The maxillary central incisor labial tipping increased to an average of 1.61 ± 2.73 mm and cant of upper lip increased by 3.40° ± 5.88° are statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: All three distalization techniques in growing children produced significant effects on anchor unit. There was an increase in FMA angle, significant bite opening, proclination of the maxillary incisors and increase in the cant of the upper lip.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/methods , Orthodontic Appliance Design/methods , Orthodontic Appliances , Adolescent , Bicuspid/pathology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cephalometry/methods , Child , Dental Arch/pathology , Face/pathology , Facial Bones/pathology , Female , Humans , Incisor/pathology , Lip , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/pathology , Maxilla/pathology , Models, Theoretical , Molar/pathology , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/instrumentation , Orthodontic Appliance Design/instrumentation , Overbite/therapy , Tooth Movement Techniques/instrumentation , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Tooth Movement Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Vertical Dimension , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...