New Technologies in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Melanocytic Lesions.

Analysis of morphological characteristics for the diagnosis of melanoma remains a challenge. New technologies for the diagnosis and prognosis of melanocytic lesions have been emerging to ensure earlier and more accurate detection. In this article, we review multiple technologies that improve melanoma diagnostic accuracy such as electrical impedance spectroscopy, pigmented lesion assay, reflectance confocal microscopy, and gene expression profile tests.

A Pilot Study of Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2% and Benzoyl Peroxide 3.75% Combination Gel in the Treatment of Perimenstrual Acne.

Background: The current mainstay treatment of perimenstrual acne consists of systemic hormonal therapies, which can be problematic due to their side effects, stigma, or pill burden. Topical treatments are often used as well; however, data on their efficacy in treating this type of hormonal acne are limited. Objective: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of clindamycin phosphate and benzoyl peroxide 1.2%/3.75% combination gel in treating perimenstrual acne in adult women. Methods: The single-group interventional pilot study was performed on 22 adult female subjects with perimenstrual acne. The subjects applied the investigational drug daily and were assessed every 14 days for a total of 99 days. Treatment success was evaluated by the investigators using the acne physician global assessment (PGA) scoring system. Drug tolerability assessment was based on the subject-reported adverse events, as well as physician-evaluated erythema, scaling, and dryness. Results: The study demonstrated a significant improvement in PGA score and lesion count, as well as patient-reported outcomes. The medication was well-tolerated in all subjects. Limitations: Limited sample size; lack of concurrent comparison group. Conclusion: Clindamycin phosphate and benzoyl peroxide 1.2%/3.75% combination gel presents an important topical option for perimenstrual acne.

COVID-19 Symptoms Are Attenuated in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Patients Treated with Dupilumab.

BACKGROUND: In the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic, we need to understand the impact of immunomodulatory medications on COVID-19 symptom severity in patients with inflammatory diseases, including the type 2/Th2 polarized skin disease, atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVE: Because it is believed that type 1/Th1 immunity controls viral infections and that there is a Th1/Th2 counter-regulation, we hypothesized that Th2 targeting with the IL-4Rα-antagonist, dupilumab, in patients with moderate-to-severe AD would rebalance the Th1/Th2 axis, potentially leading to attenuated COVID-19 symptoms. METHODS: A total of 1237 patients with moderate-to-severe AD in the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Department of Dermatology were enrolled in a registry. Patients were screened for COVID-19-related symptoms and assigned a severity score (asymptomatic [0]-fatal [5]). Scores were compared among 3 treatment groups: dupilumab (n = 632), other systemic treatments (n = 107), and limited/no treatment (n = 498). Demographic and comorbid covariates were adjusted by multivariate generalized logistic regression models. RESULTS: The dupilumab-treated group showed reduced incidence and severity of COVID-19 symptoms versus other treatment groups. Dupilumab-treated patients were less likely to experience moderate-to-severe symptoms versus patients on other systemics (P = .01) and on limited/no treatment (P = .04), and less likely to experience any symptoms versus patients on other systemics (P = .01). This effect was seen in our entire cohort and in the subgroup of patients with verified COVID-19 or high-risk exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on dupilumab experienced less severe COVID-19 manifestations and lesser symptoms compared with patients on other systemics and on limited/no treatment. These results suggest that Th2 modulation with dupilumab may have a protective effect on anti-viral immune response in patients with AD.

Management of Psoriasis During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in late December 2019 and, since then, has rapidly taken over the globe, with the scientific world furiously working to gather more data on its effect on people with and without concurrent conditions. The dysregulation of the immune system noted in COVID-19 patients is said to be similar to that seen with psoriasis. The pandemic has affected the management of psoriasis, not only for those under treatment but also those about to begin a new therapy. There has been an increasing number of studies in the current literature focusing on the relationship between psoriasis and COVID-19, offering different perspectives. This is a summary of available data in PubMed supplemented by a manual review of reference lists of included articles. There may be lack of robust evidence to drive approaches to the management of psoriasis during the pandemic; however, we hope that the current literature may provide some clues for safety considerations. The conclusion of this article is that each approach to treatment should be personalized, weighing the benefits and risks in each case separately.

Review on Novel Oral Therapies for Psoriasis.

Currently, several classes of oral therapies for psoriasis are in use, in development, or in investigative stages. Standard non-biologic treatments for psoriasis, such as methotrexate, cyclosporine, and acitretin, have generally unfavorable safety profiles and are not ideal for long-term use. This review will address the safety and efficacy of existing and novel oral therapies for psoriasis that target inflammatory pathways via modulation of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4), Janus kinases (JAKs), sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), A3 adenosine receptors, and rho-associated kinase 2 (ROCK2), with an emphasis on JAK inhibitors.

Analyzing Controversies in Management and Surveillance of Early-Stage Melanoma.

The incidence of cutaneous melanoma continues to rise dramatically worldwide, presenting a significant burden to the healthcare system. Despite this, there is still controversy in the guidelines regarding follow-up surveillance for patients with thin melanoma. Since there are no randomized clinical trials to support evidence-based guidelines for follow-up surveillance, dermatologic and oncologic organizations have developed their own recommendations based on expert opinion. However, these recommendations differ widely and are often vague, resulting in considerable variability in the management of early-stage melanoma among clinicians. The benefits of frequent follow-up visits are early detection of recurrent lesions, lower cost of early-stage melanoma compared to that of late-stage melanoma, decreased need for sentinel lymph node biopsy and adjuvant therapies, and the opportunity to educate patients on self-examination and sun protection. However, the high cost of screening and potential increased rates of biopsy, as well as over-imaging and overtreating, pose serious concerns about this approach. While more rigorous research is needed to resolve this controversy, currently clinicians should follow a relatively universal recommendation to tailor the follow-up regimen based on the patient's relative risk of recurrence and comfort.