Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA intramuscular vaccination in patients with muscular disorders.

Backgrounds: Little clinical data is available on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients with muscular disorders (MDs). The immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines against MDs, in particular, remains unknown. Thus, this study aimed to confirm the immunogenicity and safety of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine against MDs. Methods: All participants were vaccinated with two doses of mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech). The serum samples were collected from each patient on the day of second dose of vaccination, and then, consecutively, after one month, three months, and six months. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were determined using the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay. Results: We evaluated 75 individuals, including 42 patients with MDs and 33 patients with non-muscular disorders (non-MDs). Non-MD patients primarily include those with severe motor and intellectual disabilities. The median age of the patients was 32 years (range 12-64 years). After one and three months following the second immunization, patients with MDs had lower antibody responses. Furthermore, three months following the second immunization, the proportion of high responders among patients with MDs decreased significantly compared to that among patients without MDs (p-value of less than 0.01). No serious adverse events were observed in patients with or without MDs. Conclusion: Intensity and latency of antibody response were suppressed in patients with MDs. Although MDs may be a key contributor in predicting the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 immunization in MDs needs extensive research.

Efficacy of interferential current transcutaneous electrical sensory stimulation through the neck skin for treating dysphagia in children with disabilities: A case series.

Finding a suitable treatment for dysphagia has been challenging and the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation has been recognized. Moreover, the beneficial effect of interferential current transcutaneous electrical sensory stimulation has recently been described. However, the efficacy of interferential current transcutaneous electrical sensory stimulation in children with disabilities is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy of interferential current transcutaneous electrical sensory stimulation in children with disabilities. Four children with disabilities of various types underwent interferential current transcutaneous electrical sensory stimulation once a week. All patients showed improved symptoms after interferential current transcutaneous electrical sensory stimulation treatment. Videoendoscopic examination showed reduced accumulation of secretion in all patients and decreased residual bolus in two. We also felt an increased forcefulness when swallowing in two. In addition, the questionnaire results regarding dysphagia indicated improvements. No significant side effects were observed. The interferential current transcutaneous electrical sensory stimulation treatment may be effective and safe in children with disabilities. The effect of this treatment on swallowing ability needs to be further investigated by studying more cases.

Effect of levetiracetam in acute encephalitis with refractory, repetitive partial seizures during acute and chronic phase.

AIM: To clarify the effect of levetiracetam (LEV) for acute and chronic seizure control in acute encephalitis with refractory, repetitive partial seizures (AERRPS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical course of six AERRPS cases treated with LEV, and explored the acute phase termination by withdrawal from barbiturate-induced coma under artificial ventilation, and the reduction in seizure frequency during the chronic phase. LEV was administrated orally or via nasogastric tubes as an add-on agent during acute (n=3; age 8-10 years) and chronic (n=3; age 19-30 years) AERRPS. RESULTS: In the acute phase, administration of LEV (50-60 mg/kg/d) in combination with phenobarbital (n=3; peak 57.9-76.1 µg/ml) and potassium bromide (n=2; 30-36 mg/kg/d)) resulted in successful reduction of intravenous barbiturate dosage and withdrawal from artificial ventilation. In the chronic phase, seizure frequency reduced by >75% for 5-18 months with LEV 750-1500 mg/d. CONCLUSION: LEV may affect seizure control in AERRPS, particularly during the chronic phase, through its unique action of inhibition of excitatory neurotransmitter release. The regimen of oral barbiturate, potassium bromide and LEV would be worth for trial during the acute phase of AERRPS.