Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol ; 126(4): e233-e239, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29857980

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Goldenhar syndrome, also known as oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum, is a variant of hemifacial microsomia, a congenital condition affecting primarily aural, oral, and mandibular development, with vertebral anomalies, ocular abnormalities, and epibulbar dermoids. As a complex and heterogeneous condition, this disorder varies from mild to severe, and involvement is unilateral in many cases, but bilateral involvement is also known to occur. It presents several complex problems in treatment, requiring an integrated, multidisciplinary approach. CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS: Oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum has a wide range of clinical manifestations. This report describes radiographic features of the syndrome in 3 patients, as visualized on maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography. Pertinent radiographic findings include multiple substantial unilateral anomalies affecting the skull, cervical vertebrae, orbits, ears, maxilla, mandible, and teeth. DEFINITIVE INTERPRETATION: Radiographic features are consistent with those previously reported in the literature for oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to emphasize the relevance of diagnostic imaging and characterization of the syndrome as well as the significance of coordinated diagnosis and management approaches among oral and maxillofacial radiologists and medical/dental specialists to allow for planning and implementation of interdisciplinary intervention at an early stage.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Goldenhar Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Child , Female , Humans , Male
2.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 137(5): 684-9, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20451789

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In this in-vitro study, we compared the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to various commonly used esthetic pontic materials. METHODS: Prefabricated denture teeth (acrylic resin, Trubyte, Dentsply, York, Pa) and samples made from Integrity (bis-acryl composite resin, Dentsply Caulk, Milford, Del) and Alike (polymethylmethacrylate resin, GC America, Alsip, Ill) were used to represent the more common esthetic provisional materials. Each material group contained 30 samples; a total of 90 samples were bonded in the same fashion with APC PLUS maxillary lateral incisor brackets (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). Each material group was then divided into 2 testing subgroups. One subgroup was tested for shear bond strength 24 hours after bonding, and the other subgroup was tested after bonding and storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C for a week. Each bracket was loaded perpendicularly in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm per minute until bonding failure. The mean shear bond strength and standard deviation were determined for each group. Analysis of variance (ANOVA, 2-factor and 1-factor) with Tukey HSD post-hoc tests, Student t tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to test the main effects of pontic materials and time of loading (alpha = 0.05). The data were stratified, and 1-way ANOVA tests were performed with the Bonferroni adjustment (alpha = 0.01) to examine the effect of the pontic material on shear bond strength after either 1 day or 7 days of storage. RESULTS: Significant differences were found based on pontic material and time (P <0.05), but there was a significant interaction (P = 0.044), making the results uninterpretable. At 1 day, the Integrity material had a significantly higher mean shear bond strength than both Alike and the denture tooth materials (P <0.001). However, at 7 days, both Integrity and Alike had significantly higher mean shear bond strengths compared with the prefabricated denture tooth (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of Integrity or Alike requires an additional armamentarium, necessitating individual pontic fabrication by the dental practitioner, indications for clinical use are evident with direct applications to multi-disciplinary treatment modalities.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Dental Materials/chemistry , Orthodontic Brackets , Resins, Synthetic/chemistry , Tooth, Artificial , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Curing Lights, Dental , Dental Alloys/chemistry , Dental Etching , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Humans , Materials Testing , Polymethacrylic Acids/chemistry , Shear Strength , Stainless Steel/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Temperature , Time Factors , Water/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...