Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ; 59(4): 526-32, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14510918

ABSTRACT

AIM: GnRH antagonists are competitive inhibitors of GnRH receptors. Their administration induces prompt suppression of the gonadal axis. In animals, GnRH antagonists upregulate the activity of GnRH-secreting neurones, which could cause gonadotrophin rebound following inhibition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a potent GnRH antagonist, Teverelix (TEV), on the gonadal axis in healthy young women. SUBJECTS AND MEASUREMENTS: In nine women [20-35 years old, body mass index (BMI) 19-25 kg/m2] in the early follicular phase, serum LH and FSH levels were evaluated every 10 min from 08.00 to 12.00 h before, and 24 h and 96 h after TEV injection (2.5 mg in 1 ml subcutaneously on day 0). Serum gonadotrophin and oestradiol levels were also evaluated at baseline and at 6, 8, 12, 48, 72 h after TEV. RESULTS: The antagonist reduced both serum LH and FSH concentrations; LH levels were significantly and promptly reduced at +6 h (nadir at +8 h) until +48 h and recovered at +72 h, while FSH levels were reduced (P<0.05) 24 h after the antagonist and normalized at +48 h. LH (but not FSH) concentrations at +96 h exceeded baseline (P<0.05). TEV suppressed oestradiol concentrations (P<0.05) with a nadir at +24 h, comparable reduction at +48 h and recovery to baseline at +72 h. Deconvolution analysis showed that the antagonist peptide suppressed (P<0.02) the pulsatile production rate, burst mass and amplitude of LH on day 1. Pulsatile FSH secretion also fell at this time (P<0.05). LH and FSH pulse frequency were not modified by TEV. At +96 h, LH pulsatility did not significantly differ from that at baseline. Suppression of mean LH or FSH concentrations did not affect the relative pattern regularity (approximate entropy) of LH and FSH secretion. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the acute administration of a potent GnRH antagonist induces prompt inhibition of the gonadal axis lasting for 2 days in women due to mechanistically specific suppression of LH secretory burst mass and the mean FSH secretion rate. The trend toward rebound release of LH following the end of the pharmacological effect of the antagonist could reflect a rise in endogenous GnRH activity.


Subject(s)
Follicular Phase/physiology , Hormone Antagonists/pharmacology , Luteinizing Hormone/metabolism , Oligopeptides/pharmacology , Receptors, LHRH/antagonists & inhibitors , Adult , Estradiol/blood , Female , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/blood , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/metabolism , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Luteinizing Hormone/blood , Ovary/drug effects , Radioimmunoassay/methods , Secretory Rate/drug effects , Time Factors
2.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 14(3): 161-70, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9787982

ABSTRACT

In a randomised, multicentre study, the effect of azelastine eye drops (n = 51 patients) was compared in a double-blind manner with placebo eye drops (n = 30 patients) and in an open manner with levocabastine eye drops (n = 32 patients) during a 14-day treatment period involving 113 children (aged 4 to 12 years) suffering from seasonal allergic conjunctivitis/rhinoconjunctivitis. The primary variable was the response rate defined as the number of patients showing an improvement after three days of treatment of at least three score points, from a minimum baseline score of six, in the main ocular symptoms of itching, conjunctival redness and lacrimation (each assessed on a four-point scale). Patients discontinuing due to inefficacy were regarded as non-responders. The mean response rate in the azelastine eye drops group (74%) was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that in the placebo group (39%) and comparable with that in the levocabastine group. The response rates assessed by the patients in their diaries were very similar. Significant differences (p < 0.01) for azelastine compared with placebo were observed on days 3 and 14 in the mean sum scores for the three main symptoms and for a total of eight eye symptoms. The overall assessment of efficacy confirmed the superiority of both active treatments compared with placebo. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 23% of placebo-, 35% of azelastine- and 38% of levocabastine-treated patients. These were mainly local irritant effects. Overall tolerability was assessed as very good or good in 80%, 84% and 91% of placebo-, azelastine- and levocabastine-treated patients, respectively. Azelastine eye drops are effective and well-tolerated in children with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Allergic/drug therapy , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Phthalazines/therapeutic use , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/complications , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Ophthalmic Solutions , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/complications , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...