Combination of High-Dose Daptomycin and Ceftriaxone for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: A 10-Year Experience.

PURPOSE: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are increasingly common. Gram-positive bacteria such as coagulase negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus are the most commonly involved pathogens. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcome of patients with CIED infections who underwent device removal and were empirically treated with high dose (8-12 mg/kg daily) daptomycin (DAP) in combination with ceftriaxone (CRO). METHODS: Retrospective, single center study including patients admitted at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy), from June 2011 to June 2021, who underwent device removal for CIED infection and were empirically treated with DAP/CRO. FINDINGS: Overall, 147 patients were included in this study. Median duration of therapy was 16 days (IQR 14-26). Empirical treatment with DAP/CRO was confirmed as definitive treatment in 140 patients (95.2%). In 7 (4.8%) patients DAP/CRO were discontinued according to the definite microbiological isolates: Corynebacterium spp. (4), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2), Enterobacter cloacae (1). Ten patients (6.8%) underwent treatment simplification to narrow-spectrum antibiotics. One patient (0.6%) interrupted DAP-CRO due to pancytopenia. 6-month follow-up was available for 123/147 patients (83.7%): 9 patients recurred with a CIED infection (7.3%), and 9 died (7.3%). IMPLICATIONS: In our 10-year experience, high-dose DAP in combination with CRO represented a good option for empirical therapy of CIED infections. DAP-CRO combination was safe and effective, showing no significant drug-related adverse events and low rates of 6-month recurrence and mortality.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With a Mechanical Mitral Valve Prosthesis: A Multicentre Italian Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy and therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) range, the incidence of cardiac thromboembolism is not negligible, and the subgroup of patients who have a mechanical prosthetic mitral valve (PMV) has the highest risk. We aimed to assess the long-term effects of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in AF patients with a mechanical PMV who experienced a failure of VKA therapy. METHODS: In this retrospective, multicentre study, patients underwent LAAC because of thrombotic events including transient ischemic attack and/or stroke, systemic embolism, and evidence of left atrial appendage thrombosis and/or sludge, despite VKA therapy, were enrolled. Patients with a mechanical PMV were included and compared with those affected by nonvalvular AF. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, major cardiovascular events, and major bleedings at follow-up. The feasibility and safety of LAAC also were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (42% female; mean age, 70 ± 9 years), including 12 with a mechanical PMV, were enrolled. The most-frequent indication to LAAC (71%) was LAA thrombosis or sludge. Procedural success was achieved in 96% of overall cases, and in 100% of patients with a PMV. In 35 patients, a cerebral protection device was used. During a median follow-up of 6.1 ± 4.3 years, 4 patients with a PMV, and 20 patients without a PMV, reported adverse events (hazard ratio 0.73 [95% confidence interval 0.25-2.16, P = 0.564]). CONCLUSIONS: LAAC seems to be a valuable alternative in patients with AF who have a mechanical PMV, with failure of VKA therapy. This off-label, real-world clinical practice indication deserves validation in further studies.

A Referral Center Experience with Cerebral Protection Devices: Challenging Cardiac Thrombus in the EP Lab.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral protection devices (CPD) are designed to prevent cardioembolic stroke and most evidence that exists relates to TAVR procedures. There are missing data on the benefits of CPD in patients that are considered high risk for stroke undergoing cardiac procedures like left atrial appendage (LAA) closure or catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) when cardiac thrombus is present. PURPOSE: This work aimed to examine the feasibility and safety of the routine use of CPD in patients with cardiac thrombus undergoing interventions in the electrophysiology (EP) lab of a large referral center. METHODS: The CPD was placed under fluoroscopic guidance in all procedures in the beginning of the intervention. Two different CPDs were used according to the physician's discretion: (1) a capture device consisting of two filters for the brachiocephalic and left common carotid arteries placed over a 6F sheath from a radial artery; or (2) a deflection device covering all three supra-aortic vessels placed over an 8F femoral sheath. Retrospective periprocedural and safety data were obtained from procedural reports and discharge letters. Long-term safety data were obtained by clinical follow-up in our institution and telephone consultations. RESULTS: We identified 30 consecutive patients in our EP lab who underwent interventions (21 LAA closure, 9 VT ablation) with placement of a CPD due to cardiac thrombus. Mean age was 70 ± 10 years and 73% were male, while mean LVEF was 40 ± 14%. The location of the cardiac thrombus was the LAA in all 21 patients (100%) undergoing LAA-closure, whereas, in the 9 patients undergoing VT ablation, thrombus was present in the LAA in 5 cases (56%), left ventricle (n = 3, 33%) and aortic arch (n = 1, 11%). The capture device was used in 19 out of 30 (63%) and the deflection device in 11 out of 30 cases (37%). There were no periprocedural strokes or transitory ischemic attacks (TIA). CPD-related complications comprised the vascular access and were as follows: two cases of pseudoaneurysm of the femoral artery not requiring surgery (7%), 1 hematoma at the arterial puncture site (3%) and 1 venous thrombosis (3%) resolved by warfarin. At long-term follow-up, 1 TIA and 2 non-cardiovascular deaths occurred, with a mean follow-up time of 660 days. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of a cerebral protection device prior to LAA closure or VT ablation in patients with cardiac thrombus proved feasible, but possible vascular complications needed to be taken into account. A benefit in periprocedural stroke prevention for these interventions seemed plausible but has yet to be proven in larger and randomized trials.

Left atrial appendage closure: a new strategy for cardioembolic events despite oral anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (nvAF) who experienced a cardioembolic (CE) event despite adequate oral anticoagulation (OAC) are at high risk of recurrence, and further prevention strategies are deemed necessary. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of off-label use of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in this subset of patients. METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive patients with nvAF who experienced a CE event despite adequate OAC therapy were retrospectively enrolled from two Italian centers. Patients were divided according to the treatment strategy following the index event: DOAC group (49 patients who continued OAC therapy with DOACs) and LAAC group (26 patients who underwent LAAC procedure). 1:1 propensity-score matching between the two groups was performed. LAAC group was made up of two subgroups according to the post-procedural pharmacological regimen: 1) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 3 months followed by indefinite single antiplatelet therapy (LAAC+SAPT); or 2) aspirin plus DOAC for 3 months followed by indefinite DOAC therapy (LAAC+DOAC). The primary endpoint was a composite of CE event, major bleeding, or procedure-related major complication. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.4 years (IQR: 2.0-5.3), LAAC was a predictor of primary endpoint-free survival (HR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.08-0.97; P=0.044); within LAAC group, no procedure-related major complication occurred. Moreover, a trend toward a lower rate of both CE events and major bleedings was observed in LAAC group, particularly in the subgroup LAAC+DOAC. CONCLUSIONS: LAAC is a reasonable therapeutic option in nvAF patients who suffered a CE event despite adequate OAC therapy.

Outcomes of transvenous lead extraction of very old leads using bidirectional rotational mechanical sheaths: Results of a multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: Lead dwell time >10 years is a recognized predictor for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) failure and complications. Data on the efficacy and safety of TLE using the bidirectional rotational mechanical sheaths in patients with very old leads are lacking. In this multicenter study, we reported the outcomes of transvenous rotational mechanical lead extraction in patients with leads implanted for ≥10 years. METHODS: A total of 441 leads (median: 159 months [135-197]; range: 120-487) in 189 consecutive patients were removed with the Evolution RL sheaths (Cook Medical, Bloomingtom, IN, USA) and mechanical ancillary tools supporting the procedures. RESULTS: The main indication for TLE was infection in 74% of cases. Complete procedural success rate, clinical success rate, per lead were 94.8% and 98.2%, respectively. Failure of lead extraction was seen in 1.8% of leads. The additional use of a snare via the femoral approach was required in 9% of patients. Lead dwell time was the only predictor of incomplete led removal (odds ratio: 1.009; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.003-1.014; p = .002). Four major complication (2%) were encountered. During a mean time follow-up of 31 ± 27 months, 21 patients (11%) died. No procedure-related mortality occurred. Predictors of mortality included severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.06; 95% CI: 2.99-21.73; p = .001), TLE for infection (HR: 8.0; 95% CI: 1.04-62.5; p = .045), diabetes (HR: 3.7; 95% CI: 1.48-9.5; p = .005), and previous systemic infection (HR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.17-8.24; p = .022). Incomplete lead removal or failure lead extraction did not impact on survival during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated that the use of bidirectional rotational TLE mechanical sheaths combined with different mechanical tools and femoral approach allows reasonable success and safety in patients with very old leads at experienced specialized centers.

Hisian Lead Electrical Decay After TAVR Intervention.

We report a case of patient with a single-chamber Hisian pacemaker who developed complete atrioventricular block and significant deterioration of the ventricular threshold and sensing after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Revision of the implantation was required, with ventricular lead extraction and replacement.

Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Undergoing Radiation Therapy: Insights from a Ten-Year Tertiary Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) receiving radiotherapy (RT) is increasing. The management of CIED-carriers undergoing RT is challenging and requires a collaborative multidisciplinary approach. AIM: The aim of the study is to report the real-world, ten-year experience of a tertiary multidisciplinary teaching hospital. METHODS: We conducted an observational, real-world, retrospective, single-center study, enrolling all CIED-carriers who underwent RT at the San Raffaele University Hospital, between June 2010 and December 2021. All devices were MRI-conditional. The devices were programmed to an asynchronous pacing mode for patients who had an intrinsic heart rate of less than 40 beats per minute. An inhibited pacing mode was used for all other patients. All tachyarrhythmia device functions were temporarily disabled. After each RT session, the CIED were reprogrammed to the original settings. Outcomes included adverse events and changes in the variables that indicate lead and device functions. RESULTS: Between June 2010 and December 2021, 107 patients were enrolled, among which 63 (58.9%) were pacemaker carriers and 44 (41.1%) were ICD carriers. Patients were subjected to a mean of 16.4 (±10.7) RT sessions. The most represented tumors in our cohort were prostate cancer (12; 11%), breast cancer (10; 9%) and lung cancer (28; 26%). No statistically significant changes in device parameters were recorded before and after radiotherapy. Generator failures, power-on resets, changes in pacing threshold or sensing requiring system revision or programming changes, battery depletions, pacing inhibitions and inappropriate therapies did not occur in our cohort of patients during a ten-year time span period. Atrial arrhythmias were recorded during RT session in 14 patients (13.1%) and ventricular arrhythmias were observed at device interrogation in 10 patients (9.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in device parameters and arrhythmia occurrence were infrequent, and none resulted in a clinically significant adverse event.

Significance of abnormal and late ventricular signals in ventricular tachycardia ablation of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal ventricular signals (AVS) are the cornerstone of substrate-based ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in sinus rhythm. Signal characterization of AVS in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies has never been performed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe ventricular signal abnormalities in 3 different pathologies and examine their association with the diastolic component of VT circuits. METHODS: A total of 45 patients (15 ischemic cardiomyopathy [ICM], 15 arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy [ACM], 15 dilated cardiomyopathy [DCM]) who had undergone VT ablation with >50% of the diastolic pathway of the VT circuit recorded were studied. AVS were classified into late potentials (LPs) and continuous fractionated ventricular signals (CFVS), and their characteristics and correlation with the diastolic pathway of VT circuits were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-five VT circuits were analyzed. Bipolar scars were greatest in ICM endocardially (53 cm2 ICM vs 36 cm2 ACM vs 25 cm2 DCM; P = .010) and in ACM epicardially (98 cm2 ACM vs 25 cm2 ICM vs 24 cm2 DCM; P = .005). Location of the VT diastolic interval coincided with AVS location in 54% of VTs in ICM, 89% in ACM, and 72% in DCM (P = .036). There was a trend toward a greater association of diastolic intervals coinciding with LPs than with CFVS (78% vs 57%; P = .052) (69% diastolic intervals in ICM coincided with LPs, 33% with CFVS; P = .063). All patients (100%) with CFVS in ACM had VT diastolic components arising from CFVS (33% ICM, 64% DCM; P = .049). Positive predictive value for LPs vs CFVS was 77.8% vs 56.7%, and sensitivity was 67.3% vs 32.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The nature of abnormal signals in different cardiomyopathies reflects underlying pathology. LPs rather than CFVS seem to be more linked to diastolic components of VT circuits, especially in ICM. LPs have greater sensitivity and specificity for VT; however, CFVS may be of more relevance in ACM.

Step by Step through the Years-High vs. Low Energy Lead Extraction Using Advanced Extraction Techniques.

Background: Limited data is available about the outcome of TLE in patients with vs. without high energy leads in the last decade. Methods: This is an analysis of consecutive patients undergoing TLE at a high-volume TLE centre from 2001 to 2021 using the stepwise approach. Baseline characteristics, procedural details and outcome of patients with high energy lead (ICD group) vs. without high energy lead (non-ICD group) were compared. Results: Out of 667 extractions, 991 leads were extracted in 405 procedures (60.7%) in the ICD group and 439 leads in 262 procedures (39.3%) in the non-ICD group. ICD patients were significantly younger (median 67 vs. 74 years) and were significantly less often female (18.1% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.005 for both). Advanced extraction tools were used significantly more often in the ICD group (73.2% vs. 37.5%, p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in the successful removal (98.8% vs. 99.2%) or complications (4.7% vs. 3.1%) between the groups (p > 0.2 for both). Discussion: Using the stepwise approach, overall procedural success was high and complication rate was low in a high-volume centre. In patients with a high energy lead, the TLE procedure was more complex, but outcome was similar to comparator patients.

Bi-atrial characterization of the electrical substrate in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the characterization of electrical substrate in both atria in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Eight consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation (five paroxysmal, three persistent) underwent electrical substrate characterization during sinus rhythm. Mapping of the left (LA) and right atrium (RA) was performed with the use of the HD Grid catheter (Abbott). Bipolar voltage maps were analyzed to search for low voltage areas (LVA), the following electrophysiological phenomena were assessed: (1) slow conduction corridors, and (2) lines of block. EGMs were characterized to search for fractionation. Electrical characteristics were compared between atria and between paroxysmal versus persistent AF patients. RESULTS: In the RA, LVAs were present in 60% of patients with paroxysmal AF and 100% of patients with persistent AF. In the LA, LVAs were present in 40% of patients with paroxysmal AF and 66% of patients with persistent AF. The areas of LVA in the RA and LA were 4.8±7.3 cm2 and 7.8±13.6 cm2 in patients with paroxysmal AF versus 11.7±3.0 cm2 and 2.1±1.8 cm2 in patients with persistent AF. In the RA, slow conduction corridors were present in 40.0% (paroxysmal AF) versus 66.7% (persistent AF) whereas in the LA, slow conduction corridors occurred in 20.0% versus 33.3% respectively (p = ns). EGM analysis showed more fractionation in persistent AF patients than paroxysmal (RA: persistent AF 10.8 vs. paroxysmal AF 4.7%, p = .036, LA: 10.3 vs. 4.1%, p = .108). CONCLUSION: Bi-atrial involvement is present in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. This is expressed by low voltage areas and slow conduction corridors whose extension progresses as the arrhythmia becomes persistent. This electrophysiological substrate demonstrates the important interplay with the pulmonary vein triggers to constitute the substrate for persistent arrhythmia.

Working on the dirty side-the ipsilateral subclavian access for temporary pacing after lead extraction.

Background: Temporary pacing is necessary in pacemaker-dependent patients after transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for cardiac implantable electronic device infection. In case of unavailability of other accesses, we propose to use the ipsilateral subclavian access (ISA) combined with a standard permanent active fixation lead for the temporary pacemaker and present preliminary data. Methods: We consecutively enrolled patients undergoing TLE who received a temporary pacemaker using the ISA between August 2016 and April 2020 at our centre. Results: During the observation period, 36 patients undergoing TLE for pocket infection (72.2%), endocarditis (25.0%) or other causes received a temporary pacemaker over the ISA. Their mean age was 77.0 ± 10.7 years, and 13.9% were female. Complete TLE was achieved in 94.4%. There were no major periprocedural complications. Intra-hospital mortality was 11.1%. Pocket revision was performed in 19.4%. During long-term follow-up (23 ± 13 months), 8.3% had a relapse of local pocket infection and 2.8% needed rehospitalization for reintervention. Conclusions: Temporary pacing using a standard permanent active fixation lead using the ISA is a convenient alternative to conventional venous accesses. However, risks of implanting a lead into a previously infected area have to be taken into account.

Patient related outcomes of mechanical lead extraction techniques (PROMET) study: A comparison of two professions.

BACKGROUND: With an increasing number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), there has been a paralleled increase in demand for transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Cardiac surgeons (CS) and cardiologists perform TLE; however, data comparing the two groups of operators is scarce. OBJECTIVE: We compared the outcomes of TLE performed by cardiologists and CS from six European lead extraction units. METHOD: Data was collected retrospectively of 2205 patients who had 3849 leads extracted (PROMET) between 2005 and 2018. Patient demographics and procedural outcomes were compared between the CS and cardiologist groups, using propensity score matching. A multivariate regression analysis was also performed for variables associated with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: CS performed the majority of extractions (59.8%), of leads with longer dwell times (90 [57-129 interquartile range (IQR)] vs. 62 [31-102 IQR] months, CS vs. cardiologists, p < .001) and with pre-dominantly non-infectious indications (57.4% vs. 50.2%, CS vs. cardiologists, p < .001). CS achieved a higher complete success per lead than the cardiologists (98.1% vs. 95.7%, respectively, p < .01), with a higher number of minor complications (5.51% vs. 2.1%, p < .01) and similar number of major complications (0.47% vs. 1.3%, p = .12). Thirty-day mortality was similarly low in the CS and cardiologist groups (1.76% vs. 0.94%, p = .21). Unmatched data multivariate analysis revealed infection indication (OR 6.12 [1.9-20.3], p < .01), procedure duration (OR 1.01 [1.01-1.02], p < .01) and CS operator (OR 2.67, [1.12-6.37], p = .027) were associated with 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: TLE by CS was performed with similar safety and higher efficacy compared to cardiologists in high and medium-volume lead extraction centers.

Outcome of left atrial appendage closure using cerebral protection system for thrombosis: no patient left behind.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombosis increases the risk of stroke and its management has to be assessed. The aim of the present study is to evaluate short and long-term safety and efficacy of a standardized approach of percutaneous LAA closure (LAAC) routinely using a cerebral protection device (CPD) in patients with LAA thrombosis or sludge (LAAT). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 14 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation complicated by LAAT presenting in a high-volume tertiary center. In seven patients (50%) LAAT was found after anticoagulant withdrawal for severe bleedings and in the remaining half LAAT was found despite appropriate anticoagulant therapy. All patients were treated with a standardized interventional approach of LAAC routinely using a CPD and guided by transoesophageal echocardiography. RESULTS: Mean age was 68 ± 14 years and nine patients (64%) were male. Mean CHA2 DS2 -VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 3.3 ± 1.6 and 2.3 ± 1.1, respectively. Six patients (42.8%) presented organized thrombi while eight LAA sludge (57.1%). In 13 patients (92.8%) CPD was positioned through a right radial arterial access. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. In one patient we assisted to embolization of the thrombus during deployment of the device in the absence of neurological consequences. During a mean follow up of 426 ± 307 days, one patient died for non-cardiac cause while no embolic event or major bleeding were reported. CONCLUSION: In an unselected cohort, LAAC with the systematic use of CPD was a feasible, safe and effective therapeutic option for LAAT both acutely and after long-term follow-up.

Continuous Electrical Monitoring in Patients with Arrhythmic Myocarditis: Insights from a Referral Center.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and burden of arrhythmias in myocarditis are under-reported. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of continuous arrhythmia monitoring (CAM) in patients with arrhythmic myocarditis. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive adult patients (n = 104; 71% males, age 47 ± 11 year, mean LVEF 50 ± 13%) with biopsy-proven active myocarditis and de novo ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). All patients underwent prospective monitoring by both sequential 24-h Holter ECGs and CAM, including either ICD (n = 62; 60%) or loop recorder (n = 42; 40%). RESULTS: By 3.7 ± 1.6 year follow up, 45 patients (43%) had VT, 67 (64%) NSVT and 102 (98%) premature ventricular complexes (PVC). As compared to the Holter ECG (average 9.5 exams per patient), CAM identified more patients with VA (VT: 45 vs. 4; NSVT: 64 vs. 45; both p < 0.001), more VA episodes (VT: 100 vs. 4%; NSVT: 91 vs. 12%) and earlier NSVT timing (median 6 vs. 24 months, p < 0.001). The extensive ICD implantation strategy was proven beneficial in 80% of the population. Histological signs of chronically active myocarditis (n = 73, 70%) and anteroseptal late gadolinium enhancement (n = 26, 25%) were significantly associated with the occurrence of VTs during follow up, even in the primary prevention subgroup. CONCLUSION: In patients with arrhythmic myocarditis, CAM allowed accurate arrhythmia detection and showed a considerable clinical impact.

Long-term outcome of left atrial appendage occlusion with multiple devices.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate long-term efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion with multiple devices. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with a follow-up of at least 4 years, were included in this single center, retrospective registry. No specific exclusion criteria were applied. LAA occlusion was performed with the Watchman, Watchman FLX, Amplatzer Cardiac plug or Amplatzer Amulet occluder devices. RESULTS: A total of 224 consecutive patients underwent LAAO occlusion. Mean age was 72.5 ± 9.0 years. A history of stroke was present in 29%, TIA in 8.5% and a previous episode of bleeding in 64.7% of patients. In 63% there was a contraindication to oral anticoagulants. The average CHADS-VASc was 4.0 ± 1.6 and the average HAS-BLED was 3.4 ± 1.3. There was a reduction of strokes of 72.9%, thromboembolic events of 59.7% and major bleeding events of 70.9% compared to historic data. During follow-up, 48.3% of the ischemic and major bleeding events occurred within the first year. The annual mortality rate of 7.5 deaths/ 100 patients years. There were no significant differences in terms of outcome between the devices used and there were no late events associated with any device. The main antithrombotic regimen in the long term was with single antiplatelet therapy and the second one was no therapy. CONCLUSION: LAAO is a safe and effective procedure, that reduces ischemic and bleeding events in the long-term, regardless of the type of device used, in AF patients at high risk of ischemic stroke and major bleeding, without the need of anticoagulation.

Check the Need-Prevalence and Outcome after Transvenous Cardiac Implantable Electric Device Extraction without Reimplantation.

BACKGROUND: after transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of cardiac implantable electric devices (CIEDs), some patients may not benefit from device reimplantation. This study sought to analyse predictors and long-term outcome of patients after TLE with vs. without reimplantation in a high-volume centre. METHODS: all patients undergoing TLE at our centre between January 2010 and November 2015 were included into this analysis. RESULTS: a total of 223 patients (median age 70 years, 22.0% female) were included into the study. Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) was the most common device (40.4%) followed by pacemaker (PM) (31.4%), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (26.9%), and cardiac resynchronization therapy-PM (CRT-P) (1.4%). TLE was performed due to infection (55.6%), malfunction (35.9%), system upgrade (6.7%) or other causes (1.8%). In 14.8%, no reimplantation was performed after TLE. At a median follow-up of 41 months, no preventable arrhythmia-related events were documented in the no-reimplantation group, but 11.8% received a new CIED after 17-84 months. While there was no difference in short-term survival, five-year survival was significantly lower in the no-reimplantation group (78.3% vs. 94.7%, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: in patients undergoing TLE, a re-evaluation of the indication for reimplantation is safe and effective. Reimplantation was not related to preventable arrhythmia events, but all-cause survival was lower.