Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Neurosci ; 89: 319-328, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34119287

ABSTRACT

Intradural petrous bone drilling has become a widespread practice, providing extended exposure in the removal of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) or petroclival tumors. Adjacent neurovascular structures are at risk, however, when drilling is performed in this deep and narrow area. Hence, this study evaluates the use of Piezosurgery (PS) as a non-rotating tool for selective bone cutting in CPA surgery. A Piezosurgery® device was used in 36 patients who underwent microsurgery for extra-axial CPA or petroclival tumors in our Neurosurgical Department between 2013 and 2019. The clinical and radiological data were retrospectively analyzed. The use of PS was evaluated with respect to the intraoperative applicability and limitations as well as efficacy and safety of the procedure. Piezosurgical petrous bone cutting was successfully performed in the removal of meningiomas or extra-axial metastases arising from the dura of the petroclival region (21 patients) or petrous bone (15 patients). PS proved to be very helpful in the deep and narrow CPA region, considerably reducing the surgeon's distress toward bone removal in close proximity to cranial nerves and vessels in comparison to common rotating drills. The use of PS was safe without injuries to neurovascular structures. Gross total resection was achieved in 67% of petroclival and 100% of petrous bone tumors. Piezosurgery proved to be an effective and safe method for selective petrous bone cutting in CPA surgery avoiding rotating power and associated risks. This technique can particularly be recommended for bone cutting in close vicinity to critical neurovascular structures.


Subject(s)
Cerebellopontine Angle/surgery , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery , Meningioma/surgery , Petrous Bone/surgery , Piezosurgery/methods , Skull Base Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Dura Mater/surgery , Humans , Male , Microsurgery/adverse effects , Microsurgery/instrumentation , Microsurgery/methods , Middle Aged , Piezosurgery/adverse effects , Piezosurgery/instrumentation , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Neurooncol ; 126(3): 567-75, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26614518

ABSTRACT

Bevacizumab (BEV) is widely used for treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). 1-(2-Chlorethyl)-cyclohexyl-nitrosourea (CCNU, lomustine) monotherapy is an approved chemotherapeutical option for recurrent GBM. Recent evidence demonstrated a survival benefit of combined treatment with BEV and CCNU in patients with a first recurrence of GBM. We examined the outcome of recurrent GBM patients with BEV monotherapy versus BEV/CCNU therapy when used as last-line therapy. 35 patients with recurrent GBM treated between 2010 and 2014 were included in this retrospective study. Progression-free and overall survival was determined with reference to the beginning of BEV or BEV/CCNU therapy and initial diagnosis. 17 patients received BEV monotherapy, 18 patients received combined BEV and CCNU therapy. The impact of parameters such as IDH mutation, MGMT promoter methylation, tumor localization, histology and the number of surgeries were included in a multivariate ANOVA analysis. Furthermore, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), neurological function and toxicity were assessed. BEV/CCNU treatment led to an extension of PFS (6.11 months; 95% CL 3.41-12.98 months; log-rank p = 0.00241) and OS (6.59 months; 95% CL 5.51-16.3 months; log-rank p = 0.0238) of 2 months compared to BEV monotherapy. This survival advantage was independent of histology, IDH mutation status or the number of previous surgeries. Neurological function, KPS and toxicity were not significantly different between both treatment groups. Last-line therapy with BEV/CCNU results in a longer PFS and OS compared to BEV monotherapy and is well-tolerated. These findings confirm the role of these agents in the treatment of recurrent GBM and are in line with other studies.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Adult , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glioblastoma/pathology , Humans , Lomustine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...