Modified Head and Neck Swallow Scale: Using EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 to Predict Overall Survival.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Dysphagia is a treatment-related complication of head and neck cancer (HNCA). We demonstrate the predictive value of a modified head and neck swallow scale (m-HNSW) adapted from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck 35 (EORTC-QLQ-H&N35). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center cohort study utilizing a prospectively collected database of HNCA patients in a high-volume tertiary referral center. 736 HNCA patients more than 2 years from completion of treatment were identified. EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 data collected from at least one of three defined episodes of care were used. The m-HNSW uses three questions to form a 9-point dysphagia scale. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the effect of the m-HNSW while controlling for demographics, tumor staging, site, and treatment. RESULTS: Using data from 3, 6, 12 months from treatment, we analyzed a subset that included 328 patients. Three months after the completion of therapy, the m-HNSW score had a significant association with 1 (HR = 1.24, P = .0005) and 5 year survival (HR = 1.19, P = .0002) after accounting for body mass index. Six (HR = 1.14, P = .014) and 12 month (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.33, P < .0001) scores post completion of therapy predict 5-year survival. An increase of the m-HNSW score by 1 point was associated with an increase in death by 24%, and 19% at 1 and 5 years following therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The m-HNSW is a simple assessment of dysphagia using previously validated EORTC-QLC-H&N35 data that when taken at 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of therapy is predictive of overall survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:2478-2482, 2021.

Feeding During Resuscitation After Burn Injury.

Burn injury results in a sustained hypermetabolic state with resulting increased caloric and protein requirements to support the stress and immune responses; augmented protein, fat, and carbohydrate catabolism; oxidative stress; and exudative losses. Along with surgical debridement, nutrition and resuscitation are the foundations of patient management after severe burn injury. Recent literature has demonstrated a clear benefit to early enteral nutrition initiation during the resuscitation period. This review aims to examine recent literature discussing both physiologic impact of burn injury and approaches to feeding during resuscitation after burn injury; including methods of determining nutrition requirements, routes, timing, and monitoring response and the associated benefits and consequences thereof.

Open Versus Endoscopic Surgery of Zenker's Diverticula: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Most Zenker's diverticula (ZD) cohort studies are single-institution retrospective observational studies of recurrence rates. There is a gap in the literature regarding patient-reported outcomes after ZD surgery. This study was conducted to compare if open transcervical diverticulectomy (OD) is better than endoscopic laser diverticulectomy (ELD) or endoscopic stapler-assisted diverticulectomy (ESD). The study design is of systematic review and meta-analysis. The following databases were searched: SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and Word of Science through December 2017. The quality of the studies was evaluated using 22-item STROBE checklist with 3 independent physician reviewers. The Inter-rater reliability was calculated both as a percent and utilizing Cohen's Kappa. For the meta-analysis, Cohen's d for an effect size was calculated for all studies comparing dysphagia results before and after surgery. A total of 865 patients were treated across 11 selected publications, of which 106 patients were treated OD, 310 ELD, and 449 with an ESD approach. Patient-reported dysphagia outcomes were reported as Cohen's d (confidence interval): OD, ELD, and ESD were 1.31 (0.88, 1.74), 1.91 (1.62, 2.20), and 2.45 (2.04, 2.86), respectively. The pooled effect of all studies for dysphagia was 2.22 (1.85, 2.59) and regurgitation 2.20 (1.80, 2.59). We did not prove that OD has superior outcomes compared to ESD and ELD. Any method of surgical intervention yields a large effect (i.e., improvement in dysphagia and regurgitation) comparing patient-reported symptoms before and after surgery. Future research, currently underway, includes a prospective, multi-institutional study comparing standardized outcomes between treatments of ZD including symptom resolution, complications, and recurrences using validated measures to define long-term outcomes.Level of Evidence 3.

Infection Is Not a Risk Factor for Perioperative and Postoperative Blood Loss and Transfusion in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Septic hip revisions are associated with greater complications and higher costs than aseptic revisions. It is unclear whether blood loss and transfusion requirements are different in septic and aseptic revisions. We hypothesized that the blood loss and transfusion are dependent on the complexity of the revision surgery and patient's general health rather than the presence of infection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 626 revision total hip arthroplasties in 547 patients between 2009 and 2013. All the procedures were classified as septic (n = 120) or aseptic (n = 506) based on the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for periprosthetic joint infection. Independent risk factors for transfusion and blood loss were analyzed using a multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The transfusion rate was higher in septic revisions (septic = 108/120 [90%], aseptic = 370/506 [73%]; P < .001), so was the average amount of blood loss (septic = 2533 ± 161 mL, aseptic = 1974 ± 68 mL; P < .001). After adjusting for potential confounders, infection was not an independent risk factor for transfusion (P = .176) or blood loss (P = .437). Increasing age (P = .004), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P = .047), lower preoperative hemoglobin (P < .001), cell saver use (P < .001), and complex revision surgery (P < .001) were independently associated with greater risk of transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Although blood loss and transfusion rates were higher in septic revisions, the presence of infection alone did not increase the risk of transfusion or blood loss. Blood management strategies in revision total hip arthroplasties should be guided by the type of surgery planned and patient's preoperative health rather than the presence of infection.