Situs viscerum inversus and abdominal aortic aneurysm: A systematic review of a rare association.

Situs viscerum inversus (SVI) is a very rare condition in that abdominal and thoracic organs are located reversed. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening pathology due to progressive aortic enlargement until the rupture. The association between SVI and AAA is very infrequent. The aim of this study is to identify the surgical procedures available to treat AAA in SVI. We performed a literature review of all studies about AAA in SVI patients, analyzing PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science (WOS), Google Scholar databases. The survey includes all publications until June 2023. The outcomes include demographic findings, type of surgical procedure, intraoperative and postoperative complications, follow-up. A total of 12 studies, including 12 patients, were considered eligible for the review. AAA mean size was 70.5 mm (range: 55-90 mm); the most common localization was in the infrarenal aortic portion. 6 studies reported data on elective surgery, and 6 on emergency procedures. In one case endovascular treatment was performed. No intraoperative complications are reported; 3 postoperative complications are registered. Medium follow-up period was 13.5 months (range: 3-60). According to the available literature, the treatment of AAA in SVI is feasible and does not show an incremented morbidity compared to patients with a normal visceral configuration. This treatment seems to be effective also in case of endovascular treatment. AAA treatment in SVI should be performed (especially in elective settings) in high volume centers where it is possible to bring on collaboration across different surgical specialists.

Adrenocortical carcinoma metastasis. A long story.

INTRODUCTION: Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC) is an uncommon adrenal tumor with a predilection for the female population. CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old woman was referred to our attention to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease. She underwent a left adrenalectomy for ACC 5 years before; the follow-up was negative for relapse. During the preoperative study an Ultrasound Scanner study demonstrated a liver lesion in S6 - S7, confirmed by a Magnetic Resonance. A PET identified also a lesion on L1 vertebra. The hepatic US-guided biopsy resulted positive for ACC metastasis. After a muldisciplinary evaluation, the patients underwent a local approach to treat both hepatic and vertebral lesions. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in order to prevent biliary and pancreatic complications. The minimally invasive technique was adopted in order to reduce surgical trauma in oncological patients, even the previous abdominal surgery and percutaneous hepatic treatment. The patient is alive, with no recurrence after 12 months from local treatments. CONCLUSION: This is a very unusual case of double ACC metastases, discovered after the end of standard follow-up and locally treated. The patient is recurrence-free 12 months after these procedures. Minimally invasive approach to treat symptomatic cholecystectomy was used in order to avoid pancreato-biliary complications. This study emphasized the necessity to realize tailored protocols for the follow-up of rare neoplasia, as ACC. KEY WORDS: Adrenocortical carcinoma, Cholecystectomy, Liver metastasis, Thermoablation.

Minilaparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Endless Debate.

Background: Our systematic review and meta-analysis examine the impact of minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Some authors previously compared these surgical approaches without reaching any clear conclusion, since then, further trials have been performed, but an update was needed. Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the CENTRAL were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials comparing MLC versus CLC up to August 2019. The outcome measures used for comparison were operative time (OT), overall morbidity, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion and reintervention rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative pain (POP), and cosmetic results. A meta-analysis of relevant studies was performed using RevMan 5.3. Results: Fifteen studies, including 863 patients, were considered eligible to collect data and entered the meta-analysis. A total of 415 patients in the MLC group versus 448 in the CLC group were compared. No statistical difference as for overall morbidity, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion and reintervention rate, LOS, and cosmetic results were retrieved among the groups. CLC results faster and MLC shows to be the least painful. Conclusions: According to the available high-level evidence, both surgical approaches resulted substantially equivalent to perform LC, with some advantages of CLC as for OT and of MLC concerning POP. As a consequence, we can conclude that either procedure is superior or inferior to the other one; actually, we are not able to suggest the adoption of any of the two on a routine basis.

Laparoscopic Mesogastrium Excision for Gastric Cancer: Only the Beginning.

Background: Surgery, with the aid of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, is the only curative chance for gastric cancer. Unfortunately, gastric cancer had an elevated recurrence rate, primarily locally. Mesogastrium excision (MGE) during D2 lymphadenectomy has the aim to remove all possible contaminated tissue around the stomach. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science (WOS) were systematically searched for MGE reports in gastric cancer up to March 2020. The outcome reported were the number of lymph nodes retrieved, operative time (OT), overall morbidity, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rate, and length of hospital stay. Results: A total of six studies, including 518 patients, were considered eligible for this analysis. All the studies reported laparoscopic cases. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved was 36.7 ± 10.1. Mean OT was 240.7 ± 10.1 minutes. One case of conversion is reported. Overall morbidity was 6%. Medium estimated blood loss was 50.2 ± 39.6 mL. Overall length of stay was 10.7 ± 0.7 days. Mean follow-up was 11 ± 1.4 months. Conclusions: Only few studies evaluated this item, and according to the available evidence, MGE is a feasible technique that could be performed, also laparoscopically, in all surgical resections for gastric cancer with curative intent. Further studies are essential to establish the clear indication of this invasive procedure.

Evidence on postoperative abdominal binding: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Midline laparotomy is an unavoidable approach to many surgical procedures. Many surgeons prescript the use of postoperative abdominal binder during the first mobilization after surgery. The use and the cost effective of this device is still debated by many surgeons. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and the CENTRAL were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing patients who wore abdominal binder ("binder") and patient who did not wear any abdominal binder ("non-binder") up to March 2020. The primary outcomes measured in the comparison were postoperative pain, pulmonary functions, the entity of physical activity, the comfort. A meta-analysis of relevant studies was performed using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: wearing an abdominal binder after midline laparotomy seems to reduce postoperative pain on first and third postoperative day, to improve the physical activity on third postoperative day, and not affect pulmonary functions. Generally, an elastic abdominal binder is well tolerated during postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: the use of elastic abdominal binder permits a comfortable early postoperative mobilization reducing pain, increases physical activity and seems to not affect pulmonary functions.

Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery for Splenic Artery Aneurysm: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Splenic artery aneurysms (SAAs) are the most frequent visceral aneurysms, with a life-threatening risk in case of rupture. Our systematic review investigated the features of minimally invasive surgical approaches in vascular surgery for SAAs: robotic surgery and laparoscopy. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science were systematically searched for robotic or laparoscopic surgery reports in SAA up to January 2020. The outcomes of the study were operative time, overall morbidity, intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion rate, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 40 studies (29 case reports, 8 case series, 1 randomized trial, 1 video, and 1 image), including 107 patients, were considered eligible for the review. Mean operative time was 164.2 ± 75.9 min (laparoscopy), 165 min (±75.6 min) and 150 min (±87.7 min) for robotic procedures. Four cases of conversion (4.8% of all laparoscopic procedures) were reported; no conversion in the robotic series was reported. Overall morbidity was 11.2%; the most common complications were postoperative spleen infarction and pancreatitis. Medium estimated blood loss was 105.2 mL (±239.5 mL) (robotic 186.6 (±202.4) mL, laparoscopic 63 (0-270) mL). Overall length of stay was 5.43 (±5.5) days (robotic 6.1 days and laparoscopic 5.5 days). Neither mortality nor reinterventions were observed in robotic and laparoscopic series. CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with the available literature, laparoscopy and robotic surgery represent, in selected cases, a valid choice to treat SAAs. Multidisciplinary teams, comprehensive of vascular and general surgeons skilled in robotic and laparoscopic procedures, could permit to offer a tailored treatment for each patient. The rarity of this disease does not allow to perform randomized controlled trials; thus the possibility to reach definitive conclusions is currently precluded.

A rare case of pancreatic splenosis and a literature review.

Splenosis is a clinical condition characterized by the presence of ectopic splenic tissue in the abdominal cavity occurring after abdominal trauma or surgical procedure involving the spleen. We present a case of an 80-year-old Caucasian male who underwent splenectomy at the age of 36, with a prior diagnosis of cancer of the left kidney associated with a pancreatic neoformation. This study compare our case with similar published and reviev the Literature. KEY WORDS: Accessory spleen, Differential diagnosis, Kidney cancer,Laparotomy, Nephrectomy, Pancreas, Pancreatic splenosis, Splenosis.

Adenocarcinoma in the Intrathoracic Transposed Colon.

Patients who had esophagectomy with colon interposition for benign disease have long survivals. Adenocarcinoma arising in the interposed colon is a possible event. We describe a 65-year-old woman in whom we performed 37 years ago an esophagectomy with left colon interposition for lye-induced strictures. At endoscopy an obstructing adenocarcinoma in the interposed colon was detected. She underwent complete endoscopic removal of the tumor. The woman is in good general condition, with a regular diet and without evidence of recurrent disease, 5 years later.

Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy a one year record.

PURPOSE: Our study is to demonstrate the feasibility and the safety of the Minilaparoscopic Cholecystectomy. MATERIAL OF STUDY: During one year period 12 patients underwent 5mm Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and 102 patientunderwent Mini-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. In this study the exclusion criteria for surgery have been analyzed as well as the technical difficulties, the operation time, the duration of hospital stay, the post-surgery pain, the complications and the aesthetic results RESULTS: The operation time was 3 minutes longer for Mini-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, the hospital stay was shorter in Mini-laparoscopic group. Patients that underwent 5mm Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy required a longer analgesic therapy. Complications occurred during the study were not related to the method. The aesthetic results were better in Minilaparoscopic Cholecystectomy due to lower scars length. Only in two cases we converted the planned Mini-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in 5mm Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. DISCUSSION: All the patients submitted to Mini-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and 5mm Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy had the same therapeutic result. The Mini-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy gave advantages on post-surgery pain and recovery time. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience the Mini-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is a safe method that guarantees the same clinical results of conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. It shows some technical difficulties, but yet this surgery is to be recommended to expert surgeons. KEY WORDS: Gallbladder Polyps, Gallstone Disease, Mini-laparoscopic Cholecistecomy.