ABSTRACT
In this Clinical practice guide we examine the diagnostic and therapeutic management of adult patients with constipation and abdominal discomfort, at the confluence of the spectrum of irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation. Both fall within the framework of functional intestinal disorders and have major personal, health and social impact, altering the quality of life of the patients affected. The former is a subtype of irritable bowel syndrome in which constipation and altered bowel habit predominate, often along with recurring abdominal pain, bloating and abdominal distension. Constipation is characterised by infrequent or hard-to-pass bowel movements, often accompanied by straining during defecation or the sensation of incomplete evacuation. There is no underlying organic cause in the majority of cases; it being considered a functional bowel disorder. There are many clinical and pathophysiological similarities between the two conditions, the constipation responds in a similar way to commonly used drugs, the fundamental difference being the presence or absence of pain, but not in an "all or nothing" way. The severity of these disorders depends not only on the intensity of the intestinal symptoms but also on other biopsychosocial factors: association of gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms, degree of involvement, forms of perception and behaviour. Functional bowel disorders are diagnosed using the Rome criteria. This Clinical practice guide adapts to the Rome IV criteria published at the end of May 2016. The first part (96, 97, 98) examined the conceptual and pathophysiological aspects, alarm criteria, diagnostic test and referral criteria between Primary Care and Gastroenterology. This second part reviews all the available treatment alternatives (exercise, fluid ingestion, diet with soluble fibre-rich foods, fibre supplements, other dietary components, osmotic or stimulating laxatives, probiotics, antibiotics, spasmolytics, peppermint essence, prucalopride, linaclotide, lubiprostone, biofeedback, antdepressants, psychological treatment, acupuncture, enemas, sacral root neurostimulation and surgery), and practical recommendations are made for each.
Subject(s)
Constipation/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Algorithms , Constipation/complications , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complicationsABSTRACT
In this Clinical practice guide we examine the diagnostic and therapeutic management of adult patients with constipation and abdominal discomfort, at the confluence of the spectrum of irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation. Both fall within the framework of functional intestinal disorders and have major personal, health and social impact, altering the quality of life of the patients affected. The former is a subtype of irritable bowel syndrome in which constipation and altered bowel habit predominate, often along with recurring abdominal pain, bloating and abdominal distension. Constipation is characterised by infrequent or hard-to-pass bowel movements, often accompanied by straining during defecation or the sensation of incomplete evacuation. There is no underlying organic cause in the majority of cases; it being considered a functional bowel disorder. There are many clinical and pathophysiological similarities between the two conditions, the constipation responds in a similar way to commonly used drugs, the fundamental difference being the presence or absence of pain, but not in an "all or nothing" way. The severity of these disorders depends not only on the intensity of the intestinal symptoms but also on other biopsychosocial factors: association of gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms, degree of involvement, forms of perception and behaviour. Functional bowel disorders are diagnosed using the Rome criteria. This Clinical practice guide adapts to the Rome IV criteria published at the end of May 2016. The first part (96, 97, 98) examined the conceptual and pathophysiological aspects, alarm criteria, diagnostic test and referral criteria between Primary Care and Gastroenterology. This second part reviews all the available treatment alternatives (exercise, fluid ingestion, diet with soluble fibre-rich foods, fibre supplements, other dietary components, osmotic or stimulating laxatives, probiotics, antibiotics, spasmolytics, peppermint essence, prucalopride, linaclotide, lubiprostone, biofeedback, antdepressants, psychological treatment, acupuncture, enemas, sacral root neurostimulation and surgery), and practical recommendations are made for each.
Subject(s)
Constipation/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adult , Constipation/etiology , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
In this Clinical practice guide, an analysis is made of the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with constipation and abdominal discomfort, under the spectrum of irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation. These have an important personal, health and social impact, affecting the quality of life of these patients. In irritable bowel syndrome with a predominance of constipation, this is the predominant change in bowel movements, with recurrent abdominal pain, bloating and frequent abdominal distension. Constipation is characterised by infrequent or difficulty in bowel movements, associated with excessive straining during bowel movement or sensation of incomplete evacuation. There is often no underling cause, with an intestinal functional disorder being considered. They have many clinical and pathophysiological similarities, with a similar response of the constipation to common drugs. The fundamental difference is the presence or absence of pain, but not in a way evaluable way; "all or nothing". The severity depends on the intensity of bowel symptoms and other factors, a combination of gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms, level of involvement, forms of perception, and behaviour. The Rome criteria diagnose functional bowel disorders. This guide is adapted to the Rome criteria IV (May 2016) and in this first part an analysis is made of the alarm criteria, diagnostic tests, and the criteria for referral between Primary Care and Digestive Disease specialists. In the second part, a review will be made of the therapeutic alternatives available (exercise, diet, drug therapies, neurostimulation of sacral roots, or surgery), making practical recommendations for each one of them.
Subject(s)
Constipation/diagnosis , Constipation/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Algorithms , Constipation/complications , Continuity of Patient Care , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complicationsABSTRACT
In this Clinical practice guide, an analysis is made of the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with constipation and abdominal discomfort, under the spectrum of irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation. These have an important personal, health and social impact, affecting the quality of life of these patients. In irritable bowel syndrome with a predominance of constipation, this is the predominant change in bowel movements, with recurrent abdominal pain, bloating and frequent abdominal distension. Constipation is characterised by infrequent or difficulty in bowel movements, associated with excessive straining during bowel movement or sensation of incomplete evacuation. There is often no underling cause, with an intestinal functional disorder being considered. They have many clinical and pathophysiological similarities, with a similar response of the constipation to common drugs. The fundamental difference is the presence or absence of pain, but not in a way evaluable way; "all or nothing". The severity depends on the intensity of bowel symptoms and other factors, a combination of gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms, level of involvement, forms of perception, and behaviour. The Rome criteria diagnose functional bowel disorders. This guide is adapted to the Rome criteria IV (May 2016) and in this first part an analysis is made of the alarm criteria, diagnostic tests, and the criteria for referral between Primary Care and Digestive Disease specialists. In the second part, a review will be made of the therapeutic alternatives available (exercise, diet, drug therapies, neurostimulation of sacral roots, or surgery), making practical recommendations for each one of them.
Subject(s)
Constipation/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Quality of Life , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adult , Constipation/diagnosis , Constipation/etiology , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/physiopathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care/methods , Referral and Consultation , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In a context of increasing demand and pressure on the public health expenditure, appropriateness of colonoscopy indications is a topic of discussion. The objective of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness of colonoscopy requests performed in a primary care (PC) setting in Catalonia. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Out-patients >14 years of age, referred by their reference physicians from PC or hospital care settings to the endoscopy units in their reference hospitals, to undergo a colonoscopy. Evaluation of the appropriateness of 1440 colonoscopy requests issued from January to July 2011, according to the EPAGE-II guidelines (European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy). RESULTS: The most frequent indications of diagnostic suspicion requests were: rectal bleeding (37.46 %), abdominal pain (26.54 %), and anaemia study (16.78 %). The most frequent indications of disease follow-up were adenomas (58.1 %), and CRC (31.16 %). Colonoscopy was appropriate in 73.68 % of the cases, uncertain in 16.57 %, and inappropriate in 9.74 %. In multivariate analysis, performed colonoscopies reached an OR of 9.9 (CI 95 % 1.16-84.08) for qualifying as appropriate for colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis, 1.49 (CI 95 % 1.1-2.02) when requested by a general practitioner, and 1.09 (CI 95 % 1.07-1.1) when performed on women. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriateness of colonoscopy requests in our setting shows a suitable situation in accordance with recognized standards. General practitioners contribute positively to this appropriateness level. It is necessary to provide physicians with simple and updated guidelines, which stress recommendations for avoiding colonoscopy requests in the most prevalent conditions in PC.
Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Unnecessary Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , SpainSubject(s)
Dyspepsia/diagnosis , Dyspepsia/therapy , Algorithms , Dyspepsia/epidemiology , Dyspepsia/etiology , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori , Humans , Peptic Ulcer/complications , Peptic Ulcer/drug therapy , Peptic Ulcer/virology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate the attitude of primary health care physicians versus the diagnosis and treatment of infection by Helicobacter pylori in patients with dyspepsia and gastroduodenal ulcer. DESIGN: An observational, transversal study was performed by a self administered questionnaire from June to October, 1997. PARTICIPANTS: Primary health care physicians from 38 reformed Medical Centers in the metropolitan area of Barcelona were included in the study. RESULTS: Of the 359 doctors to whom the questionnaire was sent, 283 responded (78.8%). In a patient with dyspepsia 95.4% would first request endoscopy. If they knew of the presence of infection by Helicobacter pylori 96.1% would administer eradication treatment in patients with gastric and duodenal ulcer and 15% would also do so if the endoscopy were normal. If the presence of infection by Helicobacter pylori were unknown in a patient with gastroduodenal ulcer, 65.3% would treat with anti-H2 or proton pump inhibitors associated with a diagnostic test of infection by Helicobacter pylori. If the physician decided to carry out eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, 98.6% would use one of the regimes recommended by different scientific societies. If confirmation of eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection were requested, 89% would do so one and three months after completion of treatment. In patients with gastric ulcer, 69.3% would request endoscopy on completion of treatment. The percentage of physicians specialized in Family and Community Medicine who would carry out eradication treatment in patients with duodenal ulcer and Helicobacter pylori infection and who would request endoscopies in patients with dyspepsia was found to be statistically significant in comparison with physicians without this specialty. CONCLUSIONS: The attitude of primary care physicians in the metropolitan area of Barcelona with regard to the diagnosis and treatment of infection by Helicobacter pylori in gastroduodenal diseases largely reflects the recommendations recently made by several scientific societies. In general there are no significant differences with respect to this attitude in regard to the age and sex of the physician, although their training was found to influence in some of the responses analyzed.
