Evidence for commonly used teaching, learning and assessment methods in contact lens clinical skills education.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence based practice is now an important part of healthcare education. The aim of this narrative literature review was to determine what evidence exists on the efficacy of commonly used teaching and learning and assessment methods in the realm of contact lens skills education (CLE) in order to provide insights into best practice. A summary of the global regulation and provision of postgraduate learning and continuing professional development in CLE is included. METHOD: An expert panel of educators was recruited and completed a literature review of current evidence of teaching and learning and assessment methods in healthcare training, with an emphasis on health care, general optometry and CLE. RESULTS: No direct evidence of benefit of teaching and learning and assessment methods in CLE were found. There was evidence for the benefit of some teaching and learning and assessment methods in other disciplines that could be transferable to CLE and could help students meet the intended learning outcomes. There was evidence that the following teaching and learning methods helped health-care and general optometry students meet the intended learning outcomes; clinical teaching and learning, flipped classrooms, clinical skills videos and clerkships. For assessment these methods were; essays, case presentations, objective structured clinical examinations, self-assessment and formative assessment. There was no evidence that the following teaching and learning methods helped health-care and general optometry students meet the intended learning outcomes; journal clubs and case discussions. Nor was any evidence found for the following assessment methods; multiple-choice questions, oral examinations, objective structured practical examinations, holistic assessment, and summative assessment. CONCLUSION: Investigation into the efficacy of common teaching and learning and assessment methods in CLE are required and would be beneficial for the entire community of contact lens educators, and other disciplines that wish to adapt this approach of evidence-based teaching.

Differences in Practitioner Experience, Practice Type, and Profession in Attitudes Toward Growing Contact Lens Practice.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate eye care practitioners' attitudes and perceptions toward potential interventions that can enhance contact lens (CL) practice across the world, and how this is influenced by their practice setting. METHODS: A self-administered, anonymized survey was constructed in English and then forward and backward translated into six more languages. The survey was distributed online via social media platforms and mailing lists involving reputed international professional bodies. RESULTS: In total, 2,222 responses from 27 countries with sufficient responses were analyzed (53% females, median age- 37 years). Most of the respondents were optometrists (81.9%) and 47.6% were from stand-alone/independent practices. Median working experience in CL prescribing was 11.0 years (IQR: 18.0, 4-22 years). Over two-third of them declared themselves to be very hopeful (22.9%) or hopeful (45.1%) about the future of their CL practice. Among the potential interventions proposed, continuous update of knowledge and skills and competently managing CL-related complications were rated the most important (median score: 9/10 for each). Practitioners working in national/regional retail chains expressed higher proactivity in recommending CLs (9/10) than those in local chains, hospitals, and universities (for all 8/10, P <0.05). National differences were also identified in eye care practitioner attitudes and perceptions ( P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study provided important information to delineate a variety of elements characterizing CL practice across the world. These insights can serve as a basis to design strategies at national and international levels.

Predicting corneal refractive power changes after orthokeratology.

This study aimed to characterise corneal refractive power (CRP) changes along the principal corneal meridians during orthokeratology (OK). Nineteen myopes (mean age 28 ± 7 years) were fitted with OK lenses in both eyes. Corneal topography was captured before and after 14 nights of OK lens wear. CRP was calculated for the central 8 mm cornea along the horizontal and vertical meridians. The central-paracentral (CPC) power ratio was calculated as the ratio between maximum central and paracentral CRP change from individual data. There was a significant reduction in CRP at all locations in the central 4 mm of the cornea (all p < 0.001) except at 2 mm on the superior cornea (p = 0.071). A significant increase in CRP was evident in the paracentral zone at 2.5, 3 and 3.5 mm on the nasal and superior cornea and at 3.5 and 4 mm on the temporal cornea (all p < 0.05). No significant change in CRP was measured in the inferior cornea except decreased CRP at 2.5 mm (p < 0.001). CPC power ratio in the nasal and temporal paracentral regions was 2.49 and 2.23, respectively, and 2.09 for both the inferior and superior paracentral corneal regions. Our results demonstrates that OK induced significant changes in CRP along the horizontal and vertical corneal meridians. If peripheral defocus changes are inferred from corneal topography, this study suggests that the amount of myopia experienced on the peripheral retina was greater than twice the amount of central corneal power reduction achieved after OK. However, this relationship may be dependent on lens design and vary with pupil size. CPC power ratios may provide an alternative method to estimate peripheral defocus experienced after OK.

CLEAR - Contact lens wettability, cleaning, disinfection and interactions with tears.

Contact lens materials have undergone significant changes over the past 20 years, particularly with respect to the introduction of silicone hydrogel materials. Whilst this development addressed hypoxic issues, other important areas relating to contact lens success, notably comfort, require further research. Contact lens wettability remains a crucially important part of biocompatibility. Contact lenses can be made more wettable by incorporation of surfactants into blister packs, internal wetting agents, surface treatments or care solutions. However, there remains no clear association between contact lens wettability and comfort, making it challenging to determine the potential for these approaches to be of significant clinical benefit. Most contact lenses are used on a daily wear, reusable basis, which requires them to be disinfected when not worn. The ideal disinfecting solution would also improve comfort during wear. However, balancing these requirements with other factors, including biocompatibility, remains a challenge. Soft lens materials invariably take up and subsequently release certain components of disinfecting solutions onto the ocular surface. This may affect tear film stability and the normal ocular microbiome, and further research is needed in this area to determine whether this has any affect on comfort. Finally, contact lens materials sorb components of the tear film, and these interactions are complex and may change the biochemistry of the tear film, which in turn may affect their comfort. In conclusion, the interaction between lens materials, tear film and disinfection solution plays an important role in the biocompatibility of lenses. However, the exact role and whether this can be altered to improve biocompatibility and comfort during wear remains debatable. This report summarises the best available evidence to examine this complex relationship and the opportunities for practitioners to enhance in-eye comfort of contemporary lenses, along with providing suggestions for areas of study that may provide further information on this topic.

Reducing treatment zone diameter in orthokeratology and its effect on peripheral ocular refraction.

PURPOSE: To determine whether orthokeratology (OK) induced treatment zone (TZ) diameter can be reduced by altering OK lens design, and if so the impact of modifying TZ diameter on relative peripheral refraction (RPR). METHODS: 16 subjects (mean age 23.4 ±â€¯1.5 years; 8 female) completed the study. Standard (Control) OK lens design (PJ, Capricornia, Australia) or a modified version (Test) where the back optic zone diameter was reduced, and back optic zone asphericity and intermediate lens curves were altered, were worn overnight only for 7-nights in a randomised double masked order, with a minimum 1-week wash out (no lens wear) between lens designs. Full correction of refractive error was targeted. Refraction; best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); RPR (Shin-Nippon NVision-k 5001) along the horizontal and vertical meridians; and corneal topography (Medmont E300) were measured before starting lens wear and in the morning after lens removal after the seventh night of lens wear for both lens designs. TZ diameter and decentration was calculated from corneal topography. RESULTS: After 7-nights of wear both lens designs created -2.00D refraction effect with no significant difference in refractive effect or change to BCVA between the designs. The Test design created a significantly smaller horizontal (4.78 ±â€¯0.37 vs 5.70 ±â€¯0.37 mm, p < 0.001) and vertical (5.09 ±â€¯0.51 vs 5.92 ±â€¯0.51 mm p < 0.001) TZ diameter. The TZ was decentered inferior temporal with no significant difference between designs. There was no significant difference between the lens designs in RPR along the horizontal and vertical meridians at any measurement period. CONCLUSIONS: OK induced TZ diameter can be reliably reduced by altering OK lens design without detrimentally effecting lens centration or refractive effect. Reducing TZ diameter did not alter RPR, though measurement artifacts could be responsible for masking an effect. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess whether smaller TZ OK lens designs increase efficacy for slowing progression of myopia.

Accuracy and Repeatability of an Anterior Segment Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomographer.

OBJECTIVES: To assess accuracy and repeatability of the CASIA swept-source optical coherence tomographer (SS-OCT) in measuring contact lens (CL) radii of curvature and thicknesses compared with verified CL parameters and to investigate intrasession and intersession repeatability of the CASIA SS-OCT in measuring epithelial and total corneal thicknesses. METHODS: Rigid CLs with varying radii of curvature (front, rf; back, rb) and thicknesses were imaged with the CASIA SS-OCT across two sessions. Contact lens parameters were measured from processed images using an automated MATLAB program and were compared with parameters verified using standard techniques. Central epithelial and total corneal thicknesses of 43 normal subjects were measured to assess intrasession and intersession repeatability of the CASIA SS-OCT. RESULTS: No significant differences (P>0.05) were found in rigid CL rf and central and peripheral thickness measurements compared with verified CL parameters. However, the rb values obtained from the CASIA SS-OCT were consistently 0.2 mm flatter than the verified rb values (P<0.001) along horizontal and vertical meridians. Bland-Altman analysis revealed excellent intrasession agreement with mean differences of 0.004 and 0.003 mm for rf and rb, 0.000 mm for CL thickness and 0.372 and 0.395 µm for epithelial and total corneal thicknesses, respectively. Similarly, mean intersession differences of 0.020 and 0.000 mm for rf and CL thickness and 0.100 and 0.984 µm for epithelial and total corneal thicknesses were found, respectively. Ninety-five percentage confidence intervals across one or two sessions indicated insignificant undermeasurement or overmeasurement for CL rf, and corneal thicknesses, but significant bias toward overmeasurement for CL rb was found across two sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The CASIA SS-OCT produces accurate measurements of CL parameters compared with verified values. Inbuilt distortion correction in this instrument necessitated no further correction of scanned images and provided high intrasession and intersession repeatability in measuring both CLs and corneal thicknesses. Further investigation of discrepancies in rb measurements is warranted.

Treatment Zone Decentration During Orthokeratology on Eyes with Corneal Toricity.

PURPOSE: To compare the magnitude of treatment zone decentration between eyes with minimally toric corneas (≤1.50 DC, LoTor group) and eyes with moderately toric corneas (1.50 to 3.50 DC, HiTor group) after a single overnight wear of spherical orthokeratology lenses. METHODS: In the LoTor group, 21 participants (9 M, 12 F, 20-40 years) were fitted using a conventional fitting approach based on the flat corneal meridian. In the HiTor group, 12 participants (5 M, 7 F, 19-45 years) were fitted using the conventional fitting method in one eye (HiTor group I) and the other eye was fitted with a lens with slightly deeper sagittal height (HiTor group II). In all groups, BE spherical orthokeratology trial contact lenses (Boston XO) were used and corneal topography data (Medmont E300) were obtained at baseline and after a single overnight wear. The magnitude of treatment zone decentration relative to vertex normal was determined from corneal topography refractive power difference maps. Treatment zone parameters including magnitude and direction of decentration were analyzed and related to baseline corneal parameters. RESULTS: After a single overnight wear, the mean magnitude of treatment zone decentration was 0.48 ± 0.20 mm in the LoTor group, 1.06 ± 0.57 mm in HiTor group I, and 0.95 ± 0.44 mm in HiTor group II. Treatment zone decentration in the LoTor group was significantly different from HiTor group I (p < 0.001), both fitted using a conventional fitting method. Treatment zone decentration was not significantly different between HiTor group I and II (p = 0.606). The magnitude of treatment zone decentration was positively correlated with the amount of baseline corneal toricity (LoTor and HiTor group I combined, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with higher amounts of corneal toricity give rise to increased amounts of treatment zone decentration in overnight orthokeratology.

Variation in normal corneal shape and the influence of eyelid morphometry.

PURPOSE: To investigate variation in normal corneal shape and the influence of eyelid morphometry on corneal shape in primary gaze. METHODS: Corneal topography (Medmont E300) and external eye photographs (Nikon D5000 SLR camera) were captured in primary gaze from 32 East Asians (13 male and 19 female subjects, 18 to 37 years) and 32 non-East Asians (10 male and 22 female subjects, 18 to 30 years). Participants with refractive error within ±6.00 DS and up to 1.50 DC corneal toricity were enrolled. A custom MATLAB program was used to determine hemi-meridional and sectorial corneal asphericity. A separate MATLAB program (i-Metrics) was used to determine the dimensions of anterior eyelid parameters. Sectorial corneal asphericity and eyelid morphometry dimensions were compared between ethnic groups. The interactions between sectorial asphericity and eyelid morphometry were also investigated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the sectorial corneal asphericity variation between ethnicities (p = 0.231). Eyelid features including horizontal palpebral fissure width; vertical palpebral fissure height; palpebral fissure slant; upper eyelid position, slope, and curvature; and lower eyelid slope and tilt were significantly different (all p < 0.05) between ethnicities. Analysis from the combined data revealed that horizontal palpebral fissure width correlated negatively with corneal spherical equivalent M (r = -0.369, p = 0.003). Upper eyelid curvature correlated negatively with corneal M (r = -0.377, p < 0.001), with differences between ethnicities. Lower eyelid slope was significantly associated with corneal power vector J45 (r = 0.262, p = 0.037). Only lower eyelid curvature showed interaction with inferotemporal (r = -0.351, p = 0.004) and inferonasal (r = -0.250, p = 0.047) mean corneal asphericity. CONCLUSIONS: Sectorial variation is present in normal corneal shape and this variation is not significantly different between East and non-East Asian eyes. Several eyelid features appear to influence corneal shape in primary gaze.

Central and paracentral corneal curvature changes during orthokeratology.

PURPOSE: To investigate regional changes in corneal curvature and power induced by overnight orthokeratology (OK) contact lens wear over a period of 2 weeks. METHODS: Corneal topography data (Medmont E300) from 21 myopes (12 M, 9F, 20 to 40 years), who had worn BE OK lenses manufactured in Boston XO material for 14 nights, were analyzed retrospectively. Enrollment criteria were myopia up to 4.50 D and corneal toricity up to 1.50 D. Custom MATLAB programs were used to determine sectorial tangential curvature and refractive power, and to investigate changes from baseline after 1 and 14 nights, and between 1 and 14 nights of lens wear in the central circular zone (CCZ) and surrounding paracentral annular zone (PCZ), with each zone subdivided into nasal, superior, temporal, and inferior sectors. RESULTS: After OK, significant asymmetry was found in tangential curvature across sectors. In the CCZ, by day 14 there was greater flattening in the temporal (-1.27 ± 0.62 D, p < 0.001) than nasal sector (0.05 ± 0.62 D, p = 0.893). In the PCZ, by day 14 there was greater steepening in the temporal (2.37 ± 1.09 D, p < 0.001) than nasal sector (0.30 ± 1.36 D, p = 0.326). In both zones, vertical sectors did not show any asymmetry. The variation in corneal curvature across sectors and the mirror asymmetry was also reflected in variations in the corneal refractive power. CONCLUSIONS: OK induces non-uniform corneal changes to the central and paracentral regions. This non-uniformity may influence peripheral refraction profiles reported with OK that have been suggested to be influential in myopia control.

Evaluation of corneal elevation and thickness indices in pellucid marginal degeneration and keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To determine and compare corneal elevation and thickness indices, thereby formulating a reliable index to distinguish eyes with pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD) from keratoconus eyes and normal (control) eyes. SETTING: LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India. DESIGN: Initial model-building retrospective study. METHODS: Anterior and posterior corneal elevations and thickness indices were obtained from the Orbscan IIz topographer. These values were analyzed and compared between PMD patients, keratoconus patients, and control subjects. RESULTS: Of the indices, the mean values of anterior elevation (AE), ratio of the AE to the anterior best-fit sphere, ratio of the average power values of nasal quadrant to the average power values of inferior quadrant, and difference between maximum keratometry (K) and minimum K were significantly different between the 3 groups (P<.05). The highest area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (AROC) curve in discriminating PMD from keratoconus was for asphericity (0.974; cutoff ≥-0.07; sensitivity 93.3%; specificity 90.6%) followed by the ratio of average power values of the nasal and temporal quadrants to the average power values of the inferior and superior quadrants (Avg NT((D))/IS((D))) (0.959; cutoff ≥1.005; sensitivity 96.7%; specificity 90.6%). The PMD index (AROC curve, 0.935), with a cutoff of 3.45 or higher had 90% sensitivity and 93.7% specificity to distinguish PMD from keratoconus and had 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity to distinguish PMD from control eyes, with a cutoff of 2.46 or higher (AROC curve, 1.000). CONCLUSIONS: The PMD index appeared to be highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing PMD. Asphericity and Avg NT((D))/IS((D)) were clinically relevant in discriminating PMD from other groups.