A multidimensional spectrum approach to post-traumatic stress disorder: comparison between the Structured Clinical Interview for Trauma and Loss Spectrum (SCI-TALS) and the Self-Report instrument (TALS-SR).

Dimensional approaches to psychiatric disorders have shown an increased relevance in the ongoing debate for the forthcoming Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. In line with previously validated instruments for the assessment of different mood, anxiety, eating and psychotic spectra, we tested the validity and reliability of a newly developed Structured Clinical Interview for Trauma and Loss Spectrum (SCI-TALS). The instrument is based on a multidimensional approach to post-traumatic stress spectrum that includes a range of threatening or frightening experiences, as well as a variety of potentially significant losses, to which an individual can be exposed. Furthermore, it explores the spectrum of the peritraumatic reactions and post-traumatic symptoms that may ensue from either type of life events, targeting soft signs and subthreshold conditions, as well as temperamental and personality traits that may constitute risk factors for the development of the disorder. The aim of the present study is to describe the reliability of the self-report version of the SCI-TALS: the TALS-SR. Thirty patients with PTSD and thirty healthy control subjects were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Half of the patients and controls received the TALS-SR first and the SCI-TALS after 15 days; for the other half of the sample, the order of administration was reversed. Agreement between the self-report and the interview formats was substantial. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.934 to 0.994, always exceeding the threshold of 0.90. Our findings provide substantial support for the reliability of the TALS-SR questionnaire.

Residual symptom recovery from major affective episodes in bipolar disorders and rapid episode relapse/recurrence.

CONTEXT: Both bipolar disorder type I and type II are characterized by frequent affective episode relapse and/or recurrence. An increasingly important goal of therapy is reducing chronicity by preventing or delaying additional episodes. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the continued presence of subsyndromal residual symptoms during recovery from major affective episodes in bipolar disorder is associated with significantly faster episode recurrence than asymptomatic recovery and whether this is the strongest correlate of early episode recurrence among 13 variables examined. DESIGN: An ongoing prospective, naturalistic, and systematic 20-year follow-up investigation of mood disorders: the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Depression Study. SETTING: Five academic tertiary care centers. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twenty-three participants with bipolar disorder (type I or II) were followed up prospectively for a median of 17 years (mean, 14.1 [SD, 6.2] years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Participants defined as recovered by Research Diagnostic Criteria from their index major depressive episode and/or mania were divided into residual vs asymptomatic recovery groups and were compared according to the time to their next major affective episodes. RESULTS: Participants recovering with residual affective symptoms experienced subsequent major affective episodes more than 3 times faster than asymptomatic recoverers (hazard ratio, 3.36; 95% confidence interval, 2.25-4.98; P < .001). Recovery status was the strongest correlate of time to episode recurrence (P < .001), followed by a history of 3 or more affective episodes before intake (P = .007). No other variable examined was significantly associated with time to recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In bipolar disorder, residual symptoms after resolution of a major affective episode indicate that the individual is at significant risk for a rapid relapse and/or recurrence, suggesting that the illness is still active. Stable recovery in bipolar disorder is achieved only when asymptomatic status is achieved.

Validity and reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Trauma and Loss Spectrum (SCI-TALS).

BACKGROUND: DSM-IV identifies three stress response disorders (acute stress (ASD), post-traumatic stress (PTSD) and adjustment disorders (AD)) that derive from specific life events. An additional condition of complicated grief (CG), well described in the literature, is triggered by bereavement. METHODS: This paper reports on the reliability and validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for Trauma and Loss Spectrum (SCI-TALS) developed to assess the spectrum of stress response. The instrument is based on a spectrum model that emphasizes soft signs, low-grade symptoms, subthreshold syndromes, as well as temperamental and personality traits comprising clinical and subsyndromal manifestations. Study participants, enrolled at 6 Italian Departments of Psychiatry, included consecutive patients with PTSD (N = 48), CG (N = 44), and controls (N = 48). RESULTS: We showed good reliability and validity of the SCI-TALS. Domain scores were significantly higher in participants with PTSD or CG compared to controls. There were high correlations between specific SCI-TALS domains and corresponding scores on established measures of similar constructs. Participants endorsing grief and loss events reported similar scores on all instruments, except those with CG who scored significantly higher on the domain of grief reactions. CONCLUSION: These results support the existence of a specific grief-related condition and the proposal that different forms of stress response have similar manifestations.

Psychosocial disability and work role function compared across the long-term course of bipolar I, bipolar II and unipolar major depressive disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The research literature on psychosocial disability and work in mood disorders has either focused on relatively short-term course, or did not consider direct comparisons of these domains across all three of the affective subtypes of bipolar I (BP-I), bipolar II (BP-II), and unipolar major depressive disorders (UP-MDD). METHODS: Mean composite measures of psychosocial impairment and months at specific levels of overall and work impairment were compared for 158 BP-I, 133 BP-II, and 358 UP-MDD patients based on semi-structured interviews conducted during 15 years of follow-up in the NIMH Collaborative Depression Study (CDS). These are contrasted with a single month of psychosocial impairment ratings for a sample of 1787 subjects with no current psychiatric disorder. RESULTS: Patients with mood disorders experienced some degree of disability during the majority of long-term follow-up (54 to 59% of months), including 19 to 23% of months with moderate and 7 to 9% of months with severe overall impairment. Severe disability occurred a substantial percentage of time only in the specific area of work role function. BP-I patients were completely unable to carry out work role functions during 30% of assessed months, which was significantly more than for UP-MDD and BP-II patients (21% and 20%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These findings have public health, economic, and clinical importance, and underscore the need to reduce the chronicity and impairment associated with these three prevalent affective disorder subtypes. Interventional research is just beginning to address these challenges.

Family history of psychiatric disorders and alcohol and substance misuse in patients with bipolar I disorder, substance use disorder, or both.

Family history data were collected on first-degree relatives of 78 patients with bipolar I disorder (BD) and substance use disorder (SUD), 47 with BD only, and 35 with SUD only. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was significantly higher in first-degree relatives of patients with BD + SUD (64%) and BD (61%) compared with first-degree relatives of SUD patients (20%). The prevalence of alcohol misuse was significantly higher in first-degree relatives of patients with BD + SUD (23.1%) and SUD alone (28.6%) compared to first-degree relatives of patients with BD (4.3%). Our findings suggest that BD and SUD do not share familial risk factors.

Distinguishing bipolar major depression from unipolar major depression with the screening assessment of depression-polarity (SAD-P).

BACKGROUND: Patients with bipolar I or II major depression are often misdiagnosed with unipolar major depression. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a brief instrument to screen for bipolar disorder in patients actively ill with major depression. METHOD: The sample consisted of subjects who enrolled in the National Institute of Mental Health-Collaborative Program on the Psychobiology of Depression-Clinical Studies from 1978 to 1981 during an episode of major depression and included 91 subjects with bipolar I major depression, 52 with bipolar II major depression, and 338 with unipolar major depression diagnosed according to Research Diagnostic Criteria. Most of the subjects were inpatients at the time of enrollment, and subjects were prospectively followed for up to 20 years. In order to create, test, and cross-validate the screening instrument, a split-sample data analytic procedure was performed. This procedure yielded 3 groups of subjects: the bipolar I index sample, the bipolar I cross-validation sample, and the bipolar II cross-validation sample. Each group included subjects with bipolar major depression and subjects with unipolar major depression. Within the bipolar I index sample, subjects with bipolar I major depression at study intake were compared with subjects with unipolar major depression at study intake on a pool of 59 sociodemographic and clinical candidate variables. The 3 variables showing the greatest disparity between bipolar I subjects and unipolar subjects were selected for the screen, the Screening Assessment of Depression-Polarity (SAD-P). The operating characteristics of the SAD-P were then examined within the bipolar I index sample, bipolar I cross-validation sample, and bipolar II cross-validation sample. RESULTS: The items selected for the screening instrument were (1) presence of delusions during the current episode of major depression, (2) number of prior episodes of major depression, and (3) family history of major depression or mania. The screen identified bipolar major depression with a sensitivity of 0.82 in the bipolar I index sample, 0.72 in the bipolar I cross-validation sample, and 0.58 in the bipolar II cross-validation sample. With regard to misclassifying subjects with unipolar major depression, the screen provided a positive predictive value of 0.36 in the bipolar I index sample, 0.29 in the bipolar I cross-validation sample, and 0.27 in the bipolar II cross-validation sample. CONCLUSION: We suggest using the 3-item SAD-P as a preliminary screen for bipolar disorder in patients who present with an active episode of major depression.

Social anxiety disorder comorbidity in patients with bipolar disorder: a clinical replication.

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated frequency, clinical correlates and onset temporal relationship of social anxiety disorder (SAD) in adult patients with a diagnosis of bipolar I disorder. METHODS: Subjects were 189 patients whose diagnoses were assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R-Patient Version. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (12.7%) met DSM-III-R criteria for lifetime SAD; of these, 19 (10.1% of entire sample) had SAD within the last month. Significantly more bipolar patients with comorbid SAD also had substance use disorders compared to those without. On the HSCL-90, levels of interpersonal sensitivity, obsessiveness, phobic anxiety and paranoid ideation were significantly higher in bipolar patients with SAD than in those without. Bipolar patients with comorbid SAD recalled separation anxiety problems (school refusal) more frequently during childhood than those without. Lifetime SAD comorbidity was associated with an earlier age at onset of syndromal bipolar disorder. Pre-existing OCD tended to delay the onset of bipolarity. CONCLUSIONS: Social anxiety disorder comorbidity is not rare among patients with bipolar disorder and is likely to affect age of onset and phenomenology of bipolar disorder. These findings may influence treatment planning and the possibility of discovering a pathophysiological relationship between SAD and bipolarity.

The distinct temperament profiles of bipolar I, bipolar II and unipolar patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite a plethora of studies, controversies abound on whether the long-term traits of unipolar and bipolar patients could be differentiated by temperament and whether these traits, in turn, could be distinguished from subthreshold affective symptomatology. METHODS: 98 bipolar I (BP-I), 64 bipolar II (BP-II), and 251 unipolar major depressive disorder (UP-MDD) patients all when recovered from discrete affective episodes) and 617 relatives, spouses or acquaintances without lifetime RDC diagnoses (the comparison group, CG) were administered a battery of 17 self-rated personality scales chosen for theoretical relevance to mood disorders. Subsamples of each of the four groups also received the General Behavior Inventory (GBI). RESULTS: Of the 436 personality items, 103 that significantly distinguished the three patient groups were subjected to principal components analysis, yielding four factors which reflect the temperamental dimensions of "Mood Lability", "Energy-Assertiveness," "Sensitivity-Brooding," and "Social Anxiety." Most BP-I described themselves as near normal in emotional stability and extroversion; BP-II emerged as labile in mood, energetic and assertive, yet sensitive and brooding; MDD were socially timid, sensitive and brooding. Gender and age did not have marked influence on these overall profiles. Within the MDD group, those with baseline dysthymia were the most pathological (i.e., high in neuroticism, insecurity and introversion). Selected GBI items measuring hypomania and biphasic mood changes were endorsed significantly more often by BP-II. Finally, it is relevant to highlight a methodologic finding about the precision these derived temperament factors brought to the UP-BP differentiation. Unlike BP-I who were low on neuroticism, both BP-II and UP scored high on this measure: yet, in the case of BP-II high neuroticism was largely due to mood lability, in UP it reflected subdepressive traits. LIMITATION: We used self-rated personality measures, a possible limitation generic to the paper-and-pencil personality literature. It is therefore likely that BP-I may have over-rated their "sanguinity"; or should one consider such self-report as a reliable reflection of one's temperament? One can raise similar unanswerable questions about "depressiveness" and "mood lability." CONCLUSION: As contrasted to CG and published norms, the postmorbid self-described "usual" personality is 1) sanguine among many, but not all, BP-I; 2) labile or cyclothymic among BP-II; and 3) subanxious and subdepressive among UP. It is further noteworthy that with the exception of BP-II, the temperament scores of BP-I and MDD were within one SD from published norms. Rather than being pathological, these attributes are best conceived as subclinical temperamental variants of the normal, thereby supporting the notion of continuity between interepisodic and episodic phases of affective disorders. These findings overall are in line with Kraepelin's views and contrary to the DSM-IV formulation of axis-II constructs as being pathological and sharply demarcated from affective episodes.

Clinical significance of lifetime mood and panic-agoraphobic spectrum symptoms on quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggested that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with depressive and anxiety symptomatology. The well-being and functioning of patients with RA may be significantly influenced by subthreshold psychiatric comorbidity. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with RA, compared with the Italian norms and patients with diabetes, was assessed by the influence of lifetime mood and panic-agoraphobic spectrum symptoms and demographic and clinical variables. METHODS: Ninety-two patients were consecutively recruited at the Department of Rheumatology at the University Hospital of Pisa, Italy. All patients met diagnostic criteria of RA according to the American College of Rheumatology. Health-related quality of life was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (MOS SF-36). Mood and panic-agoraphobic spectra were assessed by two different structured self-report instruments: the Mood Spectrum (MOODS-SR) and the Panic-Agoraphobic Spectrum (PAS-SR), respectively. RESULTS: Patients with RA were compared, as regards the MOS SF-36 scale scores, with the Italian normative population and patients with diabetes. Compared with the Italian population, patients with RA showed significantly lower MOS SF-36 scale scores, except for role emotional. Moreover, patients with RA scored significantly lower on the role physical, bodily pain, and social functioning scales compared with patients with diabetes and higher on role emotional and mental health. A significant worsening of all MOS SF-36 scale scores was related to higher scores of the depressive domains of MOODS-SR, except for social functioning and bodily pain. A statistically significant negative association was also found between PAS-SR total score and the MOS SF-36 scales physical functioning, vitality, role emotional, and mental health. There were no statistically significant correlations between MOS SF-36 scales and the manic MOODS spectrum. In the multivariate models, the negative correlations between depressive MOODS, role emotional, and mental health were confirmed and the severity of arthritis showed a significant impact on all MOS SF-36 areas with the exception for social functioning; moreover, manic MOODS was associated with better general health. CONCLUSIONS: The present report shows that lifetime depressive spectrum symptoms negatively affects HRQoL of patients with RA and subthreshold mania improves the perception of general health. Diagnosis and appropriate clinical management of depression, including subthreshold symptoms, might enhance HRQoL in these patients.

Psychosocial disability in the course of bipolar I and II disorders: a prospective, comparative, longitudinal study.

CONTEXT: Evidence of psychosocial disability in bipolar disorder is based primarily on bipolar I disorder (BP-I) and does not relate disability to affective symptom severity and polarity or to bipolar II disorder (BP-II). OBJECTIVE: To provide detailed data on psychosocial disability in relation to symptom status during the long-term course of BP-I and BP-II. DESIGN: A naturalistic study with 20 years of prospective, systematic follow-up. SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient treatment facilities at 5 US academic centers. Patients One hundred fifty-eight patients with BP-I and 133 patients with BP-II who were followed up for a mean (SD) of 15 (4.8) years in the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Depression Study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship, by random regression, between Range of Impaired Functioning Tool psychosocial impairment scores and affective symptom status in 1-month periods during the long-term course of illness from 6-month and yearly Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation interviews. RESULTS: Psychosocial impairment increases significantly with each increment in depressive symptom severity for BP-I and BP-II and with most increments in manic symptom severity for BP-I. Subsyndromal hypomanic symptoms are not disabling in BP-II, and they may even enhance functioning. Depressive symptoms are at least as disabling as manic or hypomanic symptoms at corresponding severity levels and, in some cases, significantly more so. At each level of depressive symptom severity, BP-I and BP-II are equally impairing. When asymptomatic, patients with bipolar disorder have good psychosocial functioning, although it is not as good as that of well controls. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial disability fluctuates in parallel with changes in affective symptom severity in BP-I and BP-II. Important findings for clinical management are the following: (1) depressive episodes and symptoms, which dominate the course of BP-I and BP-II, are equal to or more disabling than corresponding levels of manic or hypomanic symptoms; (2) subsyndromal depressive symptoms, but not subsyndromal manic or hypomanic symptoms, are associated with significant impairment; and (3) subsyndromal hypomanic symptoms appear to enhance functioning in BP-II.

Cross-cultural validity of the structured clinical interview for panic-agoraphobic spectrum.

BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a series of assessment measures of psychiatric spectrum conditions associated with major DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders that might capture the true phenotypes underlying these disorders. The specific objective of this report was to describe the methods we employed to create instruments that could cross linguistic and national boundaries and to evaluate the comparability of results obtained when one of these instruments, the Structured Clinical Interview for Panic-Agoraphobic Spectrum (SCI-PAS), was administered in the United States and in Italy. METHOD: After developing, in parallel, the English and the Italian versions of the SCI-PAS, identical protocols were conducted in patients and control samples at the University of Pittsburgh and the University of Pisa to examine the reliability and validity of the interview. RESULTS: Total and domain scores on the SCI-PAS were strikingly similar in the US and Italian patient groups and in controls. In addition, similarly high levels of inter-rater and test-retest reliability were found at the two sites. Finally, virtually identical patterns of relationships were found between the domains of the SCI-PAS and established measures of the same constructs. CONCLUSIONS: The SCI-PAS displays similar reliability and validity properties in the two versions. This suggests that the instrument taps a phenotype that is consistent in American and Italian patient and control populations.

Development and preliminary testing of the General 5-Spectrum Measure (GSM-V).

The Collaborative Spectrum Project has developed structured interviews and self-report instruments to assess the spectrum of symptomatology related to panic-agoraphobia, mood, social phobia, and obsessive-compulsive and eating disorders. In order to obtain a rapid pre-test on all five of these spectrum conditions, the authors sought to develop a brief instrument that would tap these conditions. This paper reports on 1) the procedures to derive this composite instrument, the General 5-Spectrum Measure (GSM-V), by selecting items from five existing spectrum instruments, and 2) preliminary testing of the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the GSM-V. The GSM-V consists of 54 items grouped into scales that explore the five spectra described above. It was derived from existing data on five Structured Clinical Interviews that were designed to assess spectrum features by using multiple regression models. The GSM-V was administered as a stand-alone instrument along with the self-report versions of the spectrum interviews to a sample of 56 psychiatric patients in order to determine the internal consistency of its scales and the correlation with the parent spectrum measures. Moreover, to determine whether subjects would respond consistently to the same items on two different occasions (test-retest reliability), the GSM-V was re-administered within 1 month from the baseline. From each of the five spectrum interviews, items were selected that accounted for a significant proportion of variance of the total score of the parent instrument. The five sets of items so selected constitute separate scales. The scales of the GSM-V had a good to excellent internal consistency, excellent test-retest reliability, and proved to reproduce adequately the long-form measures. The GSM-V appears to provide a reliable alternative to the five longer spectrum interviews. It is envisaged that the instrument will be most useful as a pre-test to identify subjects with spectrum features that should be explored in greater detail. Additionally, it could provide a better characterization of patients with a syndromal level Axis-I disorder, who might require specific treatment strategies targeted to co-occurring subsyndromal conditions.

A 20-year longitudinal observational study of somatic antidepressant treatment effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: This observational study examined the effectiveness of somatic antidepressant treatments as administered in the community. METHOD: The study group consisted of 285 subjects with an intake diagnosis of major depressive disorder who had entered the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Depression Study as early as 1978, had at least one additional affective episode, and had been followed for up to 20 years, as recently as 1999. The characteristics that distinguished subjects receiving various levels of somatic antidepressant treatment were accounted for in what was called a propensity for treatment intensity model. The effectiveness of somatic antidepressant treatment during major affective episodes was then examined. RESULTS: Those who received higher levels of antidepressant treatment tended to have more prior episodes, more severe depressive symptoms, and more intensive somatic therapy during prior episodes and prior well intervals than those who received lower levels. Treatment effectiveness analyses that were stratified by propensity for treatment intensity demonstrated that those who received higher levels of antidepressant treatment were significantly more likely to recover from affective episodes. In contrast, those treated with lower levels were no more likely to recover than those who did not receive somatic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the indications of more severe depressive illness, those who received higher levels of somatic antidepressant treatment were more likely to recover from recurrent affective episodes. Results from this observational study extend the generalizability of reports from randomized clinical trials of antidepressants to a wider, more representative group of individuals who suffer from major depression.

A prospective investigation of the natural history of the long-term weekly symptomatic status of bipolar II disorder.

BACKGROUND: This is the first prospective longitudinal study, to our knowledge, of the natural history of the weekly symptomatic status of bipolar II disorder (BP-II). METHODS: Weekly affective symptom status ratings for 86 patients with BP-II were based on interviews conducted at 6- or 12-month intervals during a mean of 13.4 years of prospective follow-up. Percentage of weeks at each symptom severity level and the number of shifts in symptom status and polarity were examined. Predictors of chronicity for BP-II were evaluated using new chronicity measures. Chronicity was also analyzed in relation to the percentage of follow-up weeks with different types of somatic treatment. RESULTS: Patients with BP-II were symptomatic 53.9% of all follow-up weeks: depressive symptoms (50.3% of weeks) dominated the course over hypomanic (1.3% of weeks) and cycling/mixed (2.3% of weeks) symptoms. Subsyndromal, minor depressive, and hypomanic symptoms combined were 3 times more common than major depressive symptoms. Longer intake episodes, a family history of affective disorders, and poor previous social functioning predicted greater chronicity. Prescribed somatic treatment did not correlate significantly with symptom chronicity. Patients with BP-II of brief (2-6 days) vs longer (> or =7 days) hypomanias were not significantly different on any measure. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal symptomatic course of BP-II is chronic and is dominated by depressive rather than hypomanic or cycling/mixed symptoms. Symptom severity fluctuates frequently within the same patient over time, involving primarily symptoms of minor and subsyndromal severity. Longitudinally, BP-II is expressed as a dimensional illness involving the full severity range of depressive and hypomanic symptoms. Hypomania of long or short duration in BP-II seems to be part of the same disease process.

Conceptual underpinnings and empirical support for the mood spectrum.

This article presents an overview of the conceptual basis and empirical support for a unitary view of mood disturbance. The authors consider this general conceptualization of psychiatric disturbance as consisting of an array of related symptoms and behavioral features that define the "spectrum" of each disorder. They discuss how this conceptual framework aids in overcoming what they believe to be the false dichotomy between unipolar and bipolar mood disorders and in evaluating subthreshold and unusual presentations. They also describe the structured clinical interview and self-report instrument that they have developed to facilitate systematic assessment of the proposed mood spectrum. Finally, they summarize the clinical utility of such an approach to the description and assessment of patients with mood disorders.

Spectrum and nosology: implications for DSM-V.

The authors attempt to show similarities and differences between a spectrum and the DSM-IV perspective in how psychopathology is best represented to clinicians and clinical researchers. Subthreshold symptoms are given little or no attention in DSM; noncriterion symptoms are given none at all. Not otherwise specified disorders may be a widely used category in DSM-IV, but in a spectrum diagnosis there is no similar designation, because use of the whole spectrum of symptoms is possible. Although a DSM-IV categorical disorder may not be the best representation of psychopathology, it is clearly defined and is efficient for the purposes of communication and labeling. Both systems of nosology are essentially atheoretical; comorbidity exists in both, although to a lesser degree in some spectrum models. Data are summarized that clearly demonstrate the need for designers of DSM-V to create a nosology that is, at least in part, dimensional.

Can temperament identify affectively ill patients who engage in lethal or near-lethal suicidal behavior? A 14-year prospective study.

Among affectively ill patients followed naturalistically for up to 14 years, 36 committed suicide, 120 attempted suicide, and 373 had no recorded suicide attempt. Comparing these three groups on clinical and intake personality revealed that suicide completed within 12 months was predicted by clinical but not personality variables, and suicide beyond 12 months was predicted by newly derived temperament factors, not clinical variables. Attempters and completers shared core characteristics: previous attempts, impulsivity, substance abuse, and psychic turmoil within a cycling/mixed bipolar disorder. Such temperament attributes as impulsivity and assertiveness were the best prospective predictors of completed suicides beyond 12 months with a sensitivity level of 74% and specificity level of 82%.

The prospectively observed course of illness among depressed patients who commit suicide.

OBJECTIVE: These analyses were conducted to describe the course of illness among patients with major affective disorders who commit suicide. METHOD: Twenty-nine patients who entered a long-term, high-intensity follow-up study of major affective disorders and who later committed suicide within 1 year of their last follow-up interview were individually matched to other patients by age, sex, the presence or absence of lifetime drug or alcohol abuse, time to last interview and polarity. Those who suicided were compared with their controls by depressive and substance abuse morbidity during follow-up, treatment resistance, treatment compliance, suicidal behavior and psychosocial adjustment. RESULTS: Among the various measures used to characterize the course of illness during a mean follow-up of 4.3 years, only those pertaining to suicidal behavior robustly separated the suicide group from their controls. Suicidal behavior in the remote past seemed as predictively important as suicidal behavior during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Of the various features monitored over time in patients with major affective disorder, suicidal behavior itself was the clearest correlate of risk for completed suicide.