ABSTRACT
Reentrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. Verapamil and flecainide have both been successfully used as chronic oral therapy to prevent PSVT recurrences. This open-label, randomized, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of verapamil (median dose, 240 mg/day) versus flecainide (median dose, 200 mg/day) in patients with frequent and symptomatic attacks of PSVT (other than atrial fibrillation or flutter). A total of 121 patients receiving flecainide (n = 63) or verapamil (n = 58) were followed for 8.1 +/- 5.1 and 7.5 +/- 5.4 months, respectively. Response was judged clinically as effective or not by the treating physician. By life table analysis, 11% discontinued flecainide and 19% discontinued verapamil for inefficacy at 1 year (difference not significant). Both groups showed a marked reduction in the frequency of attacks of PSVT. Before therapy, 71% of flecainide patients and 73% of verapamil patients had > or = 2 attacks per month. During therapy, 86% of all flecainide patient-months and 73% of all verapamil patient-months occurred with 0 or 1 attack; 19 (30%) patients on flecainide completed the trial ( > 270 days) without symptomatic attacks versus 7 (13%) of the patients on verapamil (p = 0.026). Both drugs were well tolerated; 19% of the flecainide group discontinued primarily because of adverse effects, compared with 24% discontinuing verapamil for this reason (difference not significant). Both flecainide and verapamil are effective and well tolerated for the prevention of recurrences of PSVT. For patients in whom radiofrequency ablation procedures cannot be performed or are not indicated, either therapy is a reasonable choice for long-term prophylaxis.
Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Flecainide/therapeutic use , Tachycardia, Paroxysmal/drug therapy , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/drug therapy , Verapamil/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Electrocardiography , Female , Flecainide/administration & dosage , Flecainide/adverse effects , Humans , Life Tables , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Verapamil/administration & dosage , Verapamil/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Flecainide has been shown to be effective in short-term, controlled studies for prevention of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is unknown whether this beneficial response is maintained during long-term chronic therapy. Forty-nine patients were studied who enrolled in double-blind, placebo-controlled, short-term studies of safety and efficacy and subsequently received long-term, open-label therapy for > or = 6 months (mean duration of therapy, 17 months). To evaluate chronic efficacy, events during long-term therapy were documented by a transtelephonic monitor for either 4 or 8 weeks, comparable to the corresponding 4- or 8-week placebo-baseline periods in the same patients. Results during chronic therapy were compared with those at baseline and after the initial (short-term) treatment period. Compared with placebo-baseline results, the number of patients free of arrhythmic attacks increased significantly for both patients with SVT (from 24% to 82%, p = 0.013, n = 17) and patients with AF (from 12% to 68%, p < 0.001, n = 25). Mean time to first attack and mean number of days between attacks also showed significant and parallel increases during the chronic efficacy period. In patients with paired short- and long-term efficacy evaluations with the same dose of flecainide, end points were maintained at equivalent levels or showed further improvement (i.e., mean rate of AF attacks decreased further with chronic therapy, p = 0.036). No proarrhythmic events, death, or myocardial infarction occurred.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
