Thoracodorsal to long thoracic nerve transfer in a patient with traumatic injury: A case report.

Background: Traumatic injury to the long thoracic nerve causes paralysis of the serratus muscle, clinically expressed as winged scapula and functional impairment of the shoulder girdle. Treatment varies according to the severity of the injury, with a focus on early intervention for best results; however, the therapeutic approach remains a challenge at present. Case Description: We present the case of a 32-year-old male patient, athlete, right-handed, presented with bilateral paresis predominantly in the right arm, associated with paresthesia and changes in the coloring of the upper limbs. After being diagnosed with Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and undergoing surgery, vascular symptoms persisted with a significant loss of strength in the right shoulder. Winged scapula was observed and structural lesions were excluded on magnetic resonance imaging. Electromyographic studies confirmed the presumption of traumatic nerve involvement of the long thoracic nerve. Notwithstanding 6 months of physical therapy, there was no improvement, so a nerve transfer from the thoracodorsal nerve to the right long thoracic nerve was chosen. At 12 months, complete resolution of the winged scapula and functional recovery were observed. The patient also experienced a decrease in preoperative pain from 5/10 to 2/10 on the visual analog scale. Conclusion: Nerve transfer from the thoracodorsal nerve to the long thoracic nerve is a safe and effective technique to treat winged scapula due to long thoracic nerve injury.

Brain plasticity and age after restoring elbow flexion with distal nerve transfers in neonatal brachial plexus palsy and nonneonatal traumatic brachial plexus injury using the plasticity grading scale.

OBJECTIVE: Ulnar and/or median nerve fascicle to musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) transfers are used to restore elbow flexion following severe neonatal and nonneonatal brachial plexus injuries (BPIs). Restoring volitional control requires plastic changes in the brain. To date, whether the potential for plasticity is influenced by a patient's age remains unknown. METHODS: Patients who had presented with a traumatic upper (C5-6 or C5-7) BPI were divided into two groups: neonatal brachial plexus palsies (NBPPs) and nonneonatal traumatic BPIs (NNBPIs). Both groups underwent ulnar or median nerve transfers to the MCN for elbow flexion restoration between January 2002 and July 2020. Only those who attained a British Medical Research Council strength rating of 4 were reviewed. The primary comparison between the two groups was the plasticity grading scale (PGS) score to determine the level of independence of elbow flexion (target) from forearm motor muscle movement (donors). The authors also assessed patient compliance with rehabilitation using a 4-point Rehabilitation Quality Scale. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify intergroup differences. RESULTS: In total, 66 patients were analyzed: 22 with NBPP (mean age at surgery 10 months) and 44 with NNBPI (age range at surgery 3-67 years, mean 30.2 years; mean time to surgery 7 months, p < 0.001). All NBPP patients obtained a PGS grade of 4 at the final follow-up versus just 47.7% of NNBPI patients (mean 3.27, p < 0.001). On ordinal regression analysis, after nature of the injury was excluded because of excessive collinearity with age, age was the only significant predictor of plasticity (ß = -0.063, p = 0.003). Median rehabilitation compliance scores were not statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of plastic changes that occur for patients to regain volitional control over elbow flexion after upper arm distal nerve transfers following BPI is influenced by patient age, with complete plastic rewiring more likely in younger patients and virtually ubiquitous in infants. Older patients should be informed that elbow flexion after an ulnar or median nerve fascicle transfer to the MCN might require simultaneous wrist flexion.

Nerve transfers for brachial plexus injuries: grading of volitional control.

OBJECTIVE: After brachial plexus injuries (BPIs), nerve transfers are used to restore lost muscle function. Brain plasticity underlies the process of regaining volitional control, which encompasses disconnection of the original donor nerve-related programs and reconnection to acceptor nerve programs. To the authors' knowledge, the levels of disconnection and reconnection have never been studied systematically. In this study, the authors developed a novel 4-point plasticity grading scale (PGS) and assessed the degree of volitional control achieved, identifying clinical correlations with this score. METHODS: Patients with BPI who underwent a phrenic, spinal accessory, median, and/or ulnar fascicle nerve transfer to restore biceps and deltoid function were asked to maximally contract their target muscle as follows: 1) by using only the donor nerve program, and 2) by activating the target muscle while consciously trying to avoid using the donor nerve, with assessment each time of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale grade for muscle strength. The authors' PGS was used to rate the level of volitional control achieved. PGS grade 1 represented the lowest independent volitional control, with MRC grade 4 obtained in response to the donor command and MRC grade 0 in response to the acceptor command (minimum brain plasticity), whereas PGS grade 4 was no noticeable contraction in response to the donor command and MRC grade 4 in response to the acceptor command (maximum brain plasticity). RESULTS: In total, 153 patients were studied. For biceps restoration, the phrenic nerve was used as a donor in 44 patients, the spinal accessory nerve in 40 patients, and the median and/or ulnar fascicles in 44 patients. A triceps branch was used to restore deltoid function in 25 patients. The level of volitional control achieved was PGS grade 1 in 1 patient (0.6%), grade 2 in 21 patients (13.7%), grade 3 in 103 patients (67.3%), and grade 4 in 28 patients (18.3%). The median PGS grade did not differ significantly between the four donor nerves. No correlations were observed between age, time from BPI to surgery, duration of follow-up, or compliance with rehabilitation and PGS grade. CONCLUSIONS: Just around 20% of the authors' patients developed a complete disconnection of the donor program along with complete independent control over the reinnervated muscle. Incomplete disconnection was present in the vast majority of the patients, and the level of disconnection and control was poor in approximately 15% of patients. Brain plasticity underlies patient ability to regain volitional control after a nerve transfer, but this capacity is limited.

Differences in strength fatigue when using different donors in traumatic brachial plexus injuries.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the results of elbow flexion strength fatigue, rather than the maximal power of strength, after brachial plexus re-innervation with phrenic and spinal accessory nerves. We designed a simple but specific test to study whether statistical differences were observed among those two donor nerves. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed patients with severe brachial plexus palsy for which either phrenic nerve (PN) or spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) transfer was performed. A dynamometer was used to determine the maximal contraction strength. One and two kilograms circular weights were utilized to measure isometrically the duration of submaximal and near-maximal contraction time. Statistical analysis was performed between the two groups. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included: 21 with a PN transfer while 7 with a SAN transfer for elbow flexion. The mean time from trauma to surgery was 7.1 months for spinal accessory nerve versus 5.2 for phrenic nerve, and the mean follow-up was 57.7 and 38.6 months, respectively. Statistical analysis showed a quicker fatigue for the PN, such that patients with the SAN transfer could hold weights of 1 kg and 2 kg for a mean of 91.0 and 61.6 s, respectively, while patients with transfer of the phrenic nerve could hold 1 kg and 2 kg weights for just a mean of 41.7 and 19.6 s, respectively. Both differences were statistically significant (at p = 0.006 and 0.011, respectively). Upon correlation analysis, endurances at 1 kg and 2 kg were strongly correlated, with r = 0.85 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that phrenic to musculocutaneous nerve transfer showed an increased muscular fatigue when compared with spinal accessory nerve to musculocutaneous transfer. Further studies designed to analyze this relation should be performed to increase our knowledge about strength endurance/fatigue and muscle re-innervation.

Cirugía de la parálisis facial. Conceptos actuales / Facial paralysis surgery. Current concepts

La parálisis facial es una afección relativamente común que en la mayor parte de los casos se recuperan espontáneamente. Sin embargo, cada año se presentan 127.000 nuevos casos de parálisis faciales irreversibles. Esta patología produce consecuencias devastadoras estéticas, funcionales y psicológicas en los pacientes que la padecen. Se han descrito diversas técnicas reconstructivas al respecto, no existiendo consenso en cuanto a su utilización. Si bien los resultados que dichas técnicas ofrecen no son perfectos, muchos de ellos otorgan un muy buen resultado estético y funcional, favoreciendo la reinserción psicológica, social y laboral del paciente. El objetivo de este artículo es describir las indicaciones en las que se emplea cada técnica, sus resultados y el momento ideal en que cada una de ellas debe ser aplicada

Facial palsy is a relatively common condition, from which most cases recover spontaneously. However, each year, there are 127,000 new cases of irreversible facial paralysis. This condition causes aesthetic, functional and psychologically devastating effects in the patients who suffer it. Various reconstructive techniques have been described, but there is no consensus regarding their indication. While these techniques provide results that are not perfect, many of them give a very good aesthetic and functional result, promoting the psychological, social and labour reintegration of these patients. The aim of this article is to describe the indications for which each technique is used, their results and the ideal time when each one should be applied

Bell's palsy and partial hypoglossal to facial nerve transfer: Case presentation and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic facial nerve palsy (Bell's palsy) is a very common condition that affects active population. Despite its generally benign course, a minority of patients can remain with permanent and severe sequelae, including facial palsy or dyskinesia. Hypoglossal to facial nerve anastomosis is rarely used to reinnervate the mimic muscle in these patients. In this paper, we present a case where a direct partial hypoglossal to facial nerve transfer was used to reinnervate the upper and lower face. We also discuss the indications of this procedure. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 53-year-old woman presenting a spontaneous complete (House and Brackmann grade 6) facial palsy on her left side showed no improvement after 13 months of conservative treatment. Electromyography (EMG) showed complete denervation of the mimic muscles. A direct partial hypoglossal to facial nerve anastomosis was performed, including dissection of the facial nerve at the fallopian canal. One year after the procedure, the patient showed House and Brackmann grade 3 function in her affected face. CONCLUSIONS: Partial hypoglossal-facial anastomosis with intratemporal drilling of the facial nerve is a viable technique in the rare cases in which severe Bell's palsy does not recover spontaneously. Only carefully selected patients can really benefit from this technique.

Exposure of the sciatic nerve in the gluteal region without sectioning the gluteus maximus: Analysis of a series of 18 cases.

BACKGROUND: Dissecting through the gluteus maximus muscle by splitting its fibers, instead of complete sectioning of the muscle, is faster, involves less damage to tissues, and diminishes recovery time. The objective of the current paper is to present a clinical series of sciatic nerve lesions where the nerve was sufficiently exposed via the transgluteal approach. METHODS: We retrospectively selected 18 traumatic sciatic nerve lesions within the buttock, operated upon from January 2005 to December 2009, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. In all patients, a transgluteal approach was employed to explore and reconstruct the nerve. RESULTS: Ten males and eight females, with a mean age of 39.7 years, were studied. The etiology of the nerve lesion was previous hip surgery (n = 7), stab wound (n = 4), gunshot wound (n = 3), injection (n = 3), and hip dislocation (n = 1). In 15 (83.3%) cases, a motor deficit was present; in 12 (66.6%) cases neuropathic pain and in 12 (66.6%) cases sensory alterations were present. In all cases, the transgluteal approach was adequate to expose the injury and treat it by neurolysis alone (10 cases), neurolysis and neurorrhaphy (4 cases), and reconstruction with grafts (4 cases; three of these paired with neurolysis). The mean pre- and postoperative grades for the tibial nerve (LSUHSC scale) were 1.6 and 3.6, respectively; meanwhile, for the peroneal division, preoperative grade was 1.2 and postoperative grade was 2.4. CONCLUSIONS: The transgluteal approach adequately exposes sciatic nerve injuries of traumatic origin in the buttock and allows for adequate nerve reconstruction without sectioning the gluteus maximus muscle.

Surgical anatomy of the platysma motor branch as a donor for transfer in brachial plexus repair.

OBJECT: Nerve transfers have become a major weapon in the battle against brachial plexus lesions. Recently, a case involving the successful use of the platysma motor branch to re-innervate the pectoralis major muscle was reported. The present anatomical study was conducted to clarify the surgical anatomy of the platysma motor nerve, in view of its potential use as a donor for transfer. METHODS: Microsurgical dissections of the facial nerve and its terminal branches were performed bilaterally in five formaldehyde-fixed cadavers, thereby yielding ten samples for study. The relationships between the platysma motor branch and adjacent structures were studied and measurements performed. Specimens were removed and histologically studied. RESULTS: The platysma branch of the facial nerve was found to arise from the cervicofacial trunk. In five instances, one main nerve innervated the platysma muscle, and there was a smaller accessory nerve; in four cases, there was just a single branch to the muscle; and in one case, there was a main branch and two accessory branches. The distance between the gonion and the platysma motor branch averaged 0.8 cm (range 0.4-1.1 cm). The platysma branch received thin anastomotic rami from the transverse superficial cervical plexus. The neural surface of the platysma motor branch, on average, was 76% the surface area of the medial pectoral nerve. CONCLUSION: The anatomy of the platysma motor branch is predictable. Contraction of the platysma muscle is under voluntary control, which is an important quality for a donor nerve selected for transfer. The clinical usefulness of platysma motor branch transfer still must be elucidated.