Management of Iatrogenic Pseudoaneurysms in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

OBJECTIVE: A plethora of papers have been written regarding postcatheterization femoral pseudoaneurysms. However, literature is lacking on pseudoaneurysmal management in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Thus, we examined if pseudoaneurysms with subsequent CABG can be managed with the same strategies as those not exposed to the intense anticoagulation accompanying CABGs. METHODS: During a 14-year study period, we retrospectively examined femoral iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms (IPSAs) diagnosed postheart catheterization in patients having a subsequent CABG. Patient information was obtained from electronic medical records and included pseudoaneurysm characteristics, treatment, and resolution. Outcomes of interest included the occurrence of IPSA treatment failures and complications. RESULTS: In the 66 patients (mean age, 66 ± 11 years, 46% male) meeting inclusion criteria, mean dose of heparin received during the CABG procedure was 34 000 ± 23 000 units. The IPSA size distribution was the following: 17% of IPSAs measured <1 cm, 55% between 1 and 3 cm, and 21% measured >3 cm. Pseudoaneurysms were managed with compression, duplex-guided thrombin injection, and surgical repair (1%, 27%, and 26% of cases, respectively). Thrombin injection and surgical repair were 100% effective at treating pseudoaneurysms, with 1 patient experiencing a surgical site infection postsurgical repair. Observation-only management was employed in 30 (45%) patients. Nine of 30 patients with no intervention beyond observation had duplex documented resolution/thrombosis during follow-up. One patient initially managed by observation required readmission and surgical repair of an enlarging pseudoaneurysm (6 cm growth) following CABG. CONCLUSION: Management of pseudoaneurysms in patients prior to CABG should be similar to those patients not undergoing intense anticoagulation. In appropriate cases, small aneurysms can be safely observed, while thrombin injections are effective and safe as well. Thus, routine open surgical repair is not routinely required in patients with femoral pseudoaneurysms at time of CABG.

Ten-Year Experience of Vascular Surgeon Management of Iatrogenic Pseudoaneurysms: Do Anticoagulant and/or Antiplatelet Medications Matter?

BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining the natural history of femoral pseudoaneurysms (PSAs) were performed before the current era of anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy. The purpose of our study was to elucidate in a vascular surgeon directed approach to PSAs, the association between medication use and the failure of conservative, observation-only management. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 308 femoral iatrogenic PSAs diagnosed via duplex imaging at our institution during a 10-year time period (2004-2013). Information on PSA characteristics, treatment, and antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant medication usage was obtained. We identified patients who failed observation-only conservation management, with failure defined as the need for delayed treatment because of PSAs triggered by either expansion (≥ 1 cm increase or size enlarging to ≥ 3 cm) and/or persistence (≥ 15 days). RESULTS: Immediate and/or acute treatments of PSAs included 1 ultrasound-guided compression, 14 surgical repairs, and 126 thrombin injections. Of the 167 PSAs initially managed by observation only, 70 (42%) were found by ultrasound imaging to thrombosis spontaneously. An additional 70 (42%) patients had the diagnosis of PSA <3 cm and were managed conservatively with only clinical follow-up. Twenty-seven PSAs (16%) originally managed conservatively required additional treatment because of expansion and/or persistence. Patients receiving dual-antiplatelet therapy had higher rates of failed conservative management (44%) than patients not on dual therapy (9%, P < 0.01). The number of antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant medications used during observation was larger in patients failing conservative management (2.0 ± 0.7) versus patients not requiring additional intervention (1.5 ± 0.7, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the PSAs initially managed with observation-only did not require additional intervention. However, anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet agents use associated with PSAs required further intervention after failing observation-only management. When observation is the chosen strategy for PSA management, especially in the setting of aggressive antithrombotic and dual-antiplatelet therapy, surveillance is required to ensure proper resolution.