Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1150777, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36998466

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. About 6% of those diagnosed will develop metastatic disease. Unfortunately, metastatic prostate cancer is fatal. Prostate cancer can be castration sensitive or castration resistant. Many treatments have been shown to improve progression free survival and overall survival in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In recent years, studies have been exploring targeting mutations in the DNA Damage Repair (DDR) response that may amplify oncogenes. In this paper, we aim to discuss DDR, new approved targeted therapies, and the most recent clinical trials in the setting of metastatic CRPC.

2.
Eur J Cancer ; 172: 191-198, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35780525

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Statins are widely used in an ageing population, including subjects with solid malignancies. However, no conclusive evidence is currently available on their potential influence on patients' outcome. We aimed to assess whether statin exposure affects the survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nivolumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients with documented mRCC treated with second- or third-line nivolumab were reviewed at ten institutions from Italy, Spain and the USA. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall clinical benefit. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of variables of interest with survival. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab between January 2016 and September 2021 were eligible for inclusion in this study; 59 (27%) were statin users. The median OS (34.4 versus 18.6 months, p = 0.017) and PFS (11.7 versus 4.6 months, p = 0.013) resulted apparently longer in statin users. Stratified by age, longer median OS and PFS were associated with statin exposure in both patients aged ≥70 y (median OS: 21.4 versus 10.1 months, p = 0.047; median PFS: 16.4 versus 4.6 months, p = 0.022) and <70 y (median OS: 34.4 versus 21.4 months, p = 0.043; median PFS: 10.3 versus 4.6 months, p = 0.042). Overall clinical benefit resulted higher in statin users than non-users (71% versus 54%, p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a prognostic impact of statin use in patients receiving nivolumab for mRCC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Kidney Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Child, Preschool , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Progression-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Target Oncol ; 17(1): 61-68, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34894318

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent the standard of care as first- or second-line treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most prescribed drugs worldwide and are known to affect gut microbiota, which is gaining interest in its association with outcomes for patients on ICIs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PPIs on outcomes in RCC patients receiving immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients with metastatic RCC who received the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab for first-line treatment (Cohort 1) or single-agent nivolumab for second-line or third-line treatment (Cohort 2) from five international centers with expertise in the treatment of RCC. Data about clinicopathological characteristics, PPI use, and outcome on ICIs were collected. Endpoints of the study were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Two hundred and eighteen patients (71% male, median age 61 years) were included in the analysis, 62 in Cohort 1 (including 25 patients receiving PPIs) and 156 in Cohort 2 (including 88 patients receiving PPIs), and were followed up for a median of 42 months. In Cohort 1, no difference was observed in ORR (48% vs 57%; p = 0.203), PFS (12.2 vs 8.5 months; p = 0.928), or OS (not reached [NR] vs 27.3 months; p = 0.84). In Cohort 2, no difference was observed in ORR (32% vs 28%; p = 0.538), PFS (6.7 vs 9.0 months; p = 0.799), or OS (16.0 vs 26.0 months; p = 0.324). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RCC, concomitant PPI use did not seem to affect survival outcomes on ICIs, either as combination therapy or monotherapy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Ipilimumab/pharmacology , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
4.
Case Rep Oncol Med ; 2021: 9953230, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34868692

ABSTRACT

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a neoplasm of the B cell or T cell. Diagnosis is made by peripheral blood smear and bone marrow biopsy. Those with relapse/measurable residual disease (MRD) present with fever, weakness, fatigue, and easy bruising due to bone marrow infiltration (Kantarjian et al., 2017). A 59-year-old male with history of relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia and allogeneic stem cell transplant presented to the Emergency Department (ED) multiple times with shortness of breath. 2D Echo revealed recurrent pericardial effusion. His MRD was discovered in the pericardium. He underwent the creation of a pericardial window with cytology and culture which confirmed B cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, consistent with relapsed disease. We present a case of a patient with B-ALL and MRD who presented with symptoms of shortness of breath. His MRD was discovered not in the bone marrow, but in the pericardium.

5.
J Immunother Cancer ; 9(7)2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34226279

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids (CS) are the mainstay of immune-related adverse effect (irAE) management, as well as for other indications in cancer treatment. Previous studies evaluating whether CS affect immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) efficacy compared patients receiving CS versus no CS. However, there is a paucity of clinical data evaluating the timing of concomitant CS and CPI efficacy. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients who received CS during CPI treatment at a single institution. Patients were in two cohorts based on timing of initiation of CS (≥2 months vs <2 months after initiating CPI). Patient characteristics, irAEs, cancer type, treatment type, treatment response/progression per RECIST V.1.1, and survival data were collected. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression methods estimated HRs for the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) along with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We identified 247 patients with metastatic cancer who received CS concurrently with CPIs. The median time on CS was 1.8 months. After adjusting for treatment type, tumor type, brain metastases, and irAEs, those treated with CS ≥2 months after starting CPI had a statistically significant longer PFS (HR=0.30, p<0.001), and OS (HR 0.34, p<0.0001) than those who received CS <2 months after starting CPI. Objective response rate (ORR) for patients on CS ≥2 months was 39.8%, versus ORR for patients <2 months was 14.7% (p value =<0.001) CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that early use of CS during CPI treatment significantly hinders CPI efficacy. This data needs to be validated prospectively. Future studies should focus on the immune mechanisms by which CSs affect T-cell function early in the CPI treatment course.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/drug therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/methods , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Steroids/therapeutic use , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Male , Retrospective Studies , Steroids/pharmacology , Time Factors
6.
Perm J ; 252021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33970093

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignant neoplasm within the secretory glands of the head and neck. Clinical findings include a lump on the palate, tongue, or bottom of the mouth. Because symptoms can be mild, patients go for long periods of time without investigation. ACC is diagnosed using histology. Treatment is by surgical resection because there is no effective chemotherapy. Radiation can be effective adjuvant therapy, and proton therapy and stereotactic irradiation can be used for those who are ineligible for surgery. Immunotherapy has clinical activity for those with metastatic head and neck cancers who progress on proton therapy. This case reviews the use of immunotherapy in a patient with ACC. CASE PRESENTATION: A man in his 20s presented with a 6-month history of nasal congestion, epistaxis, and sinus tenderness. Noncontrast computed tomography of the sinuses revealed a mass of the lateral wall of the nasal cavity, lateral wall of the maxillary sinus, and pterygoid plates. Positron emission tomography confirmed metastatic disease in the right iliac crest and right cervical lymph node; biopsy of the nasopharynx confirmed ACC. The patient received proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy and completed 2 Phase 1 trails but continued to have progressive disease. The patient started nivolumab and died 12 weeks later. CONCLUSION: The patient recently received proton therapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and completed 2 Phase 1 trials but continued to have progressive disease.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Nivolumab , Platinum , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
7.
Cancer ; 127(2): 266-274, 2021 01 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33112411

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This is the largest and only multivariate study evaluating the difference in mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) between patients with cancer and patients without cancer in the United States. The objective was to assess COVID-19 mortality rates in patients with cancer versus patients without cancer and uncover possible statistically significant characteristics contributing to mortality. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed patients with cancer and patients without cancer who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from March 1 through April 30, 2020. This was a multicenter study in the state of Louisiana throughout the Ochsner Health System in both tertiary and nontertiary centers. Patients older than 18 years were eligible. Three hundred twelve patients with cancer were compared with 4833 patients without cancer. RESULTS: Mortality was found to be higher in the cancer group. Patients of advanced age with cancer had a significant increase in mortality (odds ratio [OR], 5.96; P < .001). Other significant risk factors for increased mortality were male sex (OR, 2.15), a history of chronic kidney disease (OR, 3.84), and obesity (OR, 1.30). In hospitalized patients with cancer, adverse vital signs on admission, decreased absolute lymphocyte counts, thrombocytopenia, elevated creatinine, lactic acidosis, and elevated procalcitonin all seemed to increase the risk of death. Among patients with cancer, active or progressive disease (P < .001) and recent therapy (OR, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-5.08) were shown to increase mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cancer have increased mortality in the setting of infection with SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with patients without cancer. Patients with cancer who are 65 years of age or older and those with certain comorbidities have the greatest risk of death. Recent cancer-directed therapy and disease status also seem to play roles in mortality. LAY SUMMARY: This is the largest study of patients with cancer versus patients without cancer to date and is the first multivariate analysis study comparing these 2 patient populations. This study confirms the hypothesis that patients with cancer are at increased risk for mortality and that there are multiple characteristics posing the potential to risk-stratify these patients in the setting of a future outbreak.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , Neoplasms/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Comorbidity , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Louisiana/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasms/therapy , Odds Ratio , Patient Outcome Assessment , Population Surveillance , Retrospective Studies
8.
TH Open ; 4(3): e175-e177, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32844144

ABSTRACT

Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread throughout the world and has infected close to 4 million people. It commonly presents with fever, cough, and fatigue. Due to the high inflammatory response, it is suggested that the coagulation cascade is enhanced causing thrombotic events for many patients. We describe a patient with clinical features of cerebrovascular accident, as well as documented blood clots in bilateral upper extremities. Labs revealed the presence of cold agglutinin hemolytic anemia. The association between cold agglutinin autoimmune hemolytic anemia and thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients has not been well investigated. The patient unfortunately passed away within 48 hours after admission. This case stresses the importance of considering a full workup to diagnose autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) in COVID-19 patients with thromboses and possible implications for management.

10.
Ochsner J ; 19(4): 410-412, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31903066

ABSTRACT

Background: Colorectal adenocarcinoma, the third most diagnosed cancer in males and the second most diagnosed in females, commonly presents with changes in bowel habits, rectal bleeding, weight loss, fatigue, and abdominal pain. We report the case of a patient with colorectal cancer who had an unusual initial presentation. Case Report: The patient reported dizziness, and physical examination revealed cervical lymphadenopathy. Fine needle aspiration of the lymph node supported a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, and colonoscopy found a mass in the hepatic flexure that was biopsied and identified as adenocarcinoma. The patient was treated with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and bevacizumab. Imaging and physical examination 4 months later confirmed resolution of the mass and lymphadenopathy. Conclusion: The patient is regularly followed by hematology/oncology and his primary care physician. He has shown no evidence of recurrence to date. This case supports the necessity of a complete workup and imaging when any solid lymphadenopathy is present.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...