A compact dual promoter adeno-associated viral vector for efficient delivery of two genes to dorsal root ganglion neurons.

Adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors based on serotype 5 are an efficient means to target dorsal root ganglia (DRG) to study gene function in the primary sensory neurons of the peripheral nervous system. In this study, we have developed a compact AAV dual promoter vector composed of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) and chicken beta-actin (CAG) promoters in a back-to-back configuration with a shared enhancer, and show efficient expression of two proteins simultaneously in DRG neurons. We demonstrate how this is useful for experiments on axonal regeneration, by co-expressing a gene of interest and an axonal marker. Using a farnesylated form of eGFP, which is actively transported along axons, we show superior long-distance labelling of axons of DRG neurons compared with normal eGFP. Additionally, we have efficiently transduced lumbar DRG neurons by injecting the AAV dual promoter vector into the dorsal intrathecal space, which is a less invasive delivery method. In summary, we have developed an AAV dual promoter vector designed for simultaneous expression of a gene of interest and a fluorescent protein to label long-distance axonal projections, which allows specific quantification of axons from transduced neurons after injury.

Retrograde viral transduction of cortical pyramidal neurons from the spinal cord.

PURPOSE: The primary motor pathway, the corticospinal tract, is a major target for spinal cord regeneration studies. One way of improving the regeneration of corticospinal axons is to introduce regeneration-associated genes into cortical motor neurons using viral vector delivery. METHODS: We used an engineered Herpes Simplex virus (HSV1) with the EF1alpha promoter encoding either LacZ or GFP to transduce cortical neurons through retrograde transport following the injection of vector into adult rat striatum or spinal cord. After three-days to one-month post-injection, sections of brain and spinal cord were viewed with fluorescence microscopy or processed for LacZ histochemistry. RESULTS: Many layer V motor cortical neurons were transduced following striatal injections. These were not corticospinal neurons as they were not fluorogold-labelled following tracer injection into spinal cord. Corticospinal neurons in both hemispheres were, however, transduced following direct vector injections into the dorsal column of spinal cord, yielding 250-400 transduced corticospinal neurons per animal. No non-pyramidal neurons or thalamic neurons were transduced by spinal injections. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, this HSV1.EF1alpha vector is highly effective for the transduction of corticospinal neurons without direct injection into the brain and could be used to introduce regeneration-relevant genes into these neurons with the aim of regenerating the corticospinal tract.

Effects of lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation on expression of growth-associated genes by corticospinal neurons.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation around cell bodies of primary sensory neurons and retinal ganglion cells enhances expression of neuronal growth-associated genes and stimulates axonal regeneration. We have asked if inflammation would have similar effects on corticospinal neurons, which normally show little response to spinal cord injury. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was applied onto the pial surface of the motor cortex of adult rats with or without concomitant injury of the corticospinal tract at C4. Inflammation around corticospinal tract cell bodies in the motor cortex was assessed by immunohistochemistry for OX42 (a microglia and macrophage marker). Expression of growth-associated genes c-jun, ATF3, SCG10 and GAP-43 was investigated by immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridisation. RESULTS: Application of LPS induced a gradient of inflammation through the full depth of the motor cortex and promoted c-Jun and SCG10 expression for up to 2 weeks, and GAP-43 upregulation for 3 days by many corticospinal neurons, but had very limited effects on neuronal ATF3 expression. However, many glial cells in the subcortical white matter upregulated ATF3. LPS did not promote sprouting of anterogradely labelled corticospinal axons, which did not grow into or beyond a cervical lesion site. CONCLUSION: Inflammation produced by topical application of LPS promoted increased expression of some growth-associated genes in the cell bodies of corticospinal neurons, but was insufficient to promote regeneration of the corticospinal tract.

Corticospinal neurons up-regulate a range of growth-associated genes following intracortical, but not spinal, axotomy.

The failure of some CNS neurons to up-regulate growth-associated genes following axotomy may contribute to their failure to regenerate axons. We have studied gene expression in rat corticospinal neurons following either proximal (intracortical) or distal (spinal) axotomy. Corticospinal neurons were retrogradely labelled with cholera toxin subunit B prior to intracortical lesions or concomitantly with spinal lesions. Alternate sections of forebrain were immunoreacted for cholera toxin subunit B or processed for mRNA in situ hybridization for ATF3, c-jun, GAP-43, CAP-23, SCG10, L1, CHL1 or krox-24, each of which has been associated with axotomy or axon regeneration in other neurons. Seven days after intracortical axotomy, ATF3, c-jun, GAP-43, SCG10, L1 and CHL1, but not CAP-23 or krox-24, were up-regulated by layer V pyramidal neurons, including identified corticospinal neurons. The maximum distance between the lesion and the neuronal cell bodies that up-regulated genes varied between 300 and 500 microm. However, distal axotomy failed to elicit changes in gene expression in corticospinal neurons. No change in expression of any molecule was seen in the neocortex 1 or 7 days after corticospinal axotomy in the cervical spinal cord. The expression of GAP-43, CAP-23, L1, CHL1 and SCG10 was confirmed to be unaltered after this type of injury in identified retrogradely labelled corticospinal neurons. Thus, while corticospinal neuronal cell bodies fail to respond to spinal axotomy, these cells behave like regeneration-competent neurons, up-regulating a wide range of growth-associated molecules if axotomized within the cerebral cortex.

FKBP12 mRNA expression is upregulated by intrinsic CNS neurons regenerating axons into peripheral nerve grafts in the brain.

We have examined the expression of the immunophilin FKBP12 in adult rat intrinsic CNS neurons stimulated to regenerate axons by the implantation of segments of autologous tibial nerve into the thalamus or cerebellum. After survival times of 3 days to 6 weeks, the brains were fresh-frozen. In some animals the regenerating neurons were retrogradely labelled with cholera toxin subunit B 1 day before they were killed. Sections through the thalamus or cerebellum were used for in situ hybridization with digoxygenin-labelled riboprobes for FKBP12 or immunohistochemistry to detect cholera toxin subunit B-labelled neurons. FKBP12 was constitutively expressed by many neurons, and was very strongly expressed in the hippocampus and by Purkinje cells. Regenerating neurons were found in the thalamic reticular nucleus and deep cerebellar nuclei of animals that received living grafts. Neurons in these nuclei upregulated FKBP12 mRNA; such neurons were most numerous at 3 days post grafting but were most strongly labelled at 2 weeks post grafting. Regenerating neurons identified by retrograde labelling were found to have upregulated FKBP12 mRNA. No upregulation was seen in neurons in animals that received freeze-killed grafts, which do not support axonal regeneration. We conclude that FKBP12 is a regeneration-associated gene in intrinsic CNS neurons.

Nogo receptor mRNA expression in intact and regenerating CNS neurons.

The expression of mRNA for Nogo-66 receptor (NgR) in unoperated adult rats and mice, and rats with nerve grafts placed in the thalamus and cerebellum to stimulate axonal regeneration, was investigated by in situ hybridization. NgR was strongly expressed in neurons of the neocortex, hippocampal formation, and amygdaloid nuclei and dorsal thalamus and moderately expressed in the red nucleus and vestibular nuclei. NgR mRNA was expressed in cerebellar deep nuclei and more strongly by granule cells than by Purkinje cells. Large regions of the forebrain, including the striatum, thalamic reticular nucleus, hypothalamus, and basal forebrain showed little or no NgR expression. NgR was weakly expressed in spinal neurons and some primary sensory neurons. Nerve implantation into the brain did not affect NgR expression. Some regeneration-competent neurons expressed NgR but others did not. Thus NgR expression was not correlated with the ability of neurons to regenerate axons into nerve grafts although Nogo-66 was strongly upregulated by some cells in the distal stumps of injured sciatic nerves. Nogo-66 transcripts were strongly expressed by many classes of CNS neurons and less strongly in white matter.