Update on immune-based therapy strategies targeting cancer stem cells.

Accumulating data reveals that tumors possess a specialized subset of cancer cells named cancer stem cells (CSCs), responsible for metastasis and recurrence of malignancies, with various properties such as self-renewal, heterogenicity, and capacity for drug resistance. Some signaling pathways or processes like Notch, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), Hedgehog (Hh), and Wnt, as well as CSCs' surface markers such as CD44, CD123, CD133, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) have pivotal roles in acquiring CSCs properties. Therefore, targeting CSC-related signaling pathways and surface markers might effectively eradicate tumors and pave the way for cancer survival. Since current treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy cannot eradicate all of the CSCs and tumor relapse may happen following temporary recovery, improving novel and more efficient therapeutic options to combine with current treatments is required. Immunotherapy strategies are the new therapeutic modalities with promising results in targeting CSCs. Here, we review the targeting of CSCs by immunotherapy strategies such as dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, chimeric antigen receptors (CAR)-engineered immune cells, natural killer-cell (NK-cell) therapy, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), checkpoint inhibitors, and the use of oncolytic viruses (OVs) in pre-clinical and clinical studies. This review will mainly focus on blood malignancies but also describe solid cancers.

Functionality of immune cells in COVID-19 infection: development of cell-based therapeutics.

Introduction: In late December 2019, a sudden severe respiratory illness of unknown origin was reported in China. In early January 2020, the cause of COVID-19 infection was announced a new coronavirus called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Examination of the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence revealed a close resemblance to the previously reported SARS-CoV and coronavirus Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV). However, initial testing of drugs used against SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV has been ineffective in controlling SARS-CoV-2. One of the key strategies to fight the virus is to look at how the immune system works against the virus, which has led to a better understanding of the disease and the development of new therapies and vaccine designs. Methods: This review discussed the innate and acquired immune system responses and how immune cells function against the virus to shed light on the human body's defense strategies. Results: Although immune responses have been revealed critical to eradicating infections caused by coronaviruses, dysregulated immune responses can lead to immune pathologies thoroughly investigated. Also, the benefit of mesenchymal stem cells, NK cells, Treg cells, specific T cells, and platelet lysates have been submitted as promising solutions to prevent the effects of infection in patients with COVID-19. Conclusion: It has been concluded that none of the above has undoubtedly been approved for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19, but clinical trials are underway better to understand the efficacy and safety of these cellular therapies.

Effects of Lipopolysaccharide from Porphyromonas gingivalis and Escherichia coli on Gene Expression Levels of Toll-like Receptors and Inflammatory Cytokines in Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

BACKGROUND: Periodontal diseases originate from a group of oral inflammatory infections initiated by oral pathogens. Among these pathogens, Gram-negative bacteria such as p. gingivalis play a major role in chronic periodontitis. P. gingivalis harbours lipopolysaccharide (LPS) which enables it to attach to TLR2. OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the effects of P. gingivalis and E. coli LPS on the gene expression of TLRs and inflammatory cytokines in human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs). METHODS: We evaluated the expression level of TLR2, TLR4, IL-6, IL-10, and 1L-18 in hDPSCs treated with 1µg/mL of P. gingivalis lipopolysaccharide and E. coli LPS at three different exposure times using Real-time RT-PCR. RESULT: The test group treated with P. gingivalis LPS showed a high level of TLR4 expression in 24 hours exposure period and the lowest expression in 48 hours of exposure time. In the case of IL-10, the lowest expression was in the 24 hours exposure period. Although in the E.coli LPS treated group, IL-10 showed the highest expression in 24 and lowest in 48 hours exposure period. Moreover, IL-18 in P. gingivalis LPS treated group showed a significant difference between 6, 24, and 48-time periods of exposure, but not in the E. coli LPS treated group. CONCLUSION: Both types of LPS stimulate inflammation through TLR4 expression. P. gingivalis LPS performs more potentially than E. coli in terms of stimulating inflammation at the first 24 hours of exposure. Nevertheless, our study confirmed that increasing P. gingivalis and/or the E.coli LPS exposure time, despite acting as an inflammatory stimulator, apparently showed anti-inflammatory properties.

Evaluating the effect of LPS from periodontal pathogenic bacteria on the expression of senescence-related genes in human dental pulp stem cells.

The human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) are one of the readily available sources of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and can be considered as a type of tool cells for cell-based therapies. However, the main limitation in the clinical use of these cells is DPSC senescence, which can be induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of oral pathogenic bacteria. Up to now, far little attention has been paid to exploring the molecular mechanisms of senescence in DPSCs. So, the current study aimed to investigate the underlying molecular mechanism of senescence in hDPSCs stimulated with Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) and Escherichia coli (E. coli)-derived LPSs, by evaluating both mRNA and protein expression of four important senescence-related genes, including TP53, CDKN1A, CDKN2A and SIRT1. To this purpose, hDPSCs were stimulated with different LPSs for 6, 24 and 48 h and then the gene expression was evaluated using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and western blotting. Following stimulation with P. gingivalis and E. coli-derived LPSs, the relative mRNA and protein expression of all genes were significantly up-regulated in a time-dependent manner, as compared with unstimulated hDPSCs. Moreover, the hDPSCs stimulated with P. gingivalis LPS for 6 and 24 h had the highest mRNA expression of CDKN1A and SIRT1, respectively (p < 0.0001), whereas the highest mRNA expression of CDKN2A and TP53 was seen in hDPSCs stimulated with E. coli LPS for 48 h (p < 0.0001). In summary, because DPSCs have been reported to have therapeutic potential for several cell-based therapies, targeting molecular mechanisms aiming at preventing DPSC senescence could be considered a valuable strategy.