Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Wound Care ; 26(sup4): S26-S30, 2017 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28379104

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Traditional burn dressings demonstrate unfavourable tendencies of shrinking when wet and failing to maintain their integrity when manipulated. To overcome these obstacles, gel-forming fibre dressings have emerged as an alternative. Our objective was to observe the clinical properties and healing ability in the setting of burn wounds in a paediatric centre of a chitosan-based dressing containing silver. METHODS: A sample of 12 partial-thickness burns in 10 children were identified for treatment with the chitosan-based silver dressing. The dressings were moistened before application, and monitored for any shrinkage on application. Patients were monitored for healing at outpatient follow-up visits and the dressings were allowed to separate as healing occurred. RESULTS: We treated 12 burns in 10 children with an average age of 5.2 years. The burns had an average proportion of total body surface area (TBSA) of 3.6 % and involved the trunk and all extremities. Wounds healed mostly or completely in an average of 8.3 days. Dressings retained their size when wet and integrity when removed. No burns were found to be infected at any point in the study. CONCLUSIONS: The chitosan-based dressing offered an optimal environment for moist wound management, and did not demonstrate the shrinkage or disintegration that diminishes the clinical usability of widely used hydrofibre dressings. The burns healed within an expected period of time, and did not undergo any infectious processes. Based on the results of this pilot study, the chitosan-based silver dressing is deserving of further study as an alternative to traditional burn dressings.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Bandages , Burns/therapy , Chitosan , Silver Compounds/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Pilot Projects , Re-Epithelialization , Wound Healing , Young Adult
2.
J Wound Care ; 24(7): S4-8, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26198721

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Despite extensive research into the treatment of partial-thickness burns, to date there has not been the emergence of a preeminent modality. This pilot study, the first such study to be performed in a burn unit in the US, was designed to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of the application of copolymer dressing (Suprathel; PolyMedics Innovations Corporation, Stuttgart, Germany) for both superficial and deeper partial-thickness burns. METHOD: The copolymer dressing was used as a primary wound dressing to treat superficial and deep partial-thickness burns (average 5% total body surface area) in paediatric patients. Burns were debrided within 24 hours, at bedside, in the burn unit or in the operating room. The copolymer dressing was then applied directly to the wound and covered with a non-adherent second layer and an absorptive outer dressing. After discharge, patients were seen every 5-7 days until healed. Parameters evaluated included average hospital length of stay, average number of intravenous doses of narcotics administered, pain score at first follow-up visit, average time to complete re epithelialisation, incidence of burn wound infection, and patient/parent satisfaction on a 4-point scale. We also evaluated our experience with the dressing. Data were evaluated retrospectively under an Investigational Review Board approved protocol. RESULTS: Of the 17 patients assessed the average hospital length of stay was 1.4 days during which the average number of intravenous narcotic doses administered before copolymer dressing application was 1.5 and after was 0.1 doses. At the first follow-up visit, average pain score was 1.2 on a 10-point scale and the average time to re epithelialisation was 9.5 days. There was no incidence of burn wound infection. Patient/parent satisfaction was average of 3.66 on a 4-point scale. The staff had found that the self-adherence and elasticity of the dressing made it easy to apply and stay adherent, especially in areas of difficult contour. There were no readmissions for further debridement or skin grafting. CONCLUSION: Our experience shows that patients may be discharged shortly after the application of the copolymer dressing, with manageable pain scores and ease of use as determined by the caretakers high satisfaction. This new, fully synthetic copolymer dressing is easy to apply, does not require any additional antimicrobial coverage and may be used to successfully manage deeper partial-thickness burns, donor sites or burns in areas of contour, where many other dressings might not be considered or be appropriate. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None declared.


Subject(s)
Burns/therapy , Occlusive Dressings , Polyesters/therapeutic use , Child , Debridement , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...