ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We systematically reviewed and performed a meta-analysis of the genitourinary congenital malformation rate after conception by intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared to in vitro fertilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies to compare perinatal outcomes between children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection vs in vitro fertilization. Studies showing genitourinary congenital malformation rates were included. We assessed the risk of bias, focusing on the quality of genitourinary congenital malformation reporting and analysis targeted at singletons. Meta-analysis was done using a random effects model for 3 outcomes, including overall genitourinary congenital malformation, hypospadias and cryptorchidism. Sensitivity analysis was also performed in only studies at low risk for bias. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1,482 articles. We performed a full text review of 111 of these studies, of which 22 met inclusion criteria for systematic review. Meta-analysis of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization in 12,270 and 24,240 cases, respectively, revealed that intracytoplasmic sperm injection was associated with a significantly higher rate of overall genitourinary congenital malformation compared to in vitro fertilization (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02-1.59, p = 0.04). However, when including only 4 studies at low risk for bias with a total of 7,727 and 14,308 intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization cases, respectively, the difference was not significant (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.00-1.64, p = 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of hypospadias (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.87-1.69) or cryptorchidism (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.97-2.00) between males conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection vs in vitro fertilization. On all analyses there was no significant statistical heterogeneity between studies (I(2) = 0). CONCLUSIONS: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection is associated with a slightly higher risk of genitourinary malformation in offspring than in vitro fertilization. However, when only higher quality studies were analyzed, the difference was not significant. The hypospadias and cryptorchidism rates in offspring are similar for the 2 conception methods.
Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro/adverse effects , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/adverse effects , Urogenital Abnormalities/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , Urogenital Abnormalities/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We present the outcomes and long-term follow-up of patients who underwent conversion to an ileal conduit urinary diversion using the retubularized patch from the initial augmentation ileocystoplasty. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent this surgery at our centre. The indications for surgery, workup, clinical outcomes and complication rates were assessed. Patient-reported symptom response based on global response assessment (GRA) was determined and used as a subjective measure of overall treatment effectiveness. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with either bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) (n = 11) or neurogenic bladder (n = 2) were followed for a mean of 80 months. The most common indication for surgical conversion was persistent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or bladder pain. Late complications were frequent, typically low-grade, and usually manageable with conservative therapy; the most common were urinary tract infections (n = 6) and parastomal hernias (n = 5). Two patients developed ureteric strictures. Nine of 13 patients required additional surgery to manage complications or persistent symptoms. Only 5 of 11 GRA respondents reported a successful therapeutic outcome and BPS/IC patients who underwent concurrent cystourethrectomy tended to be most satisfied (2/3). Nevertheless, several patients still achieved symptom control when no other treatment options were available to them. CONCLUSION: Conversion to an ileal conduit using the retubularized ileocystoplasty patch offers several technical and therapeutic advantages over creating a urinary diversion from a new bowel segment. It should therefore be considered a viable treatment option in patients who have exhausted more conservative management of their LUTS.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite the frequency at which urologists endoscopically estimate lesion size, their accuracy has not been established. Our objectives were to determine the accuracy of cystoscopic and ureteroscopic estimates of lesion size using in vitro models of the urinary tract and to assess potential impacting factors. METHODS: Eleven staff urologists and 9 urology learners performed cystoscopy on a series of pig bladders containing mock papillary and flat lesions. Each provided three sets of size estimates: two using only the cystoscope to assess intraobserver agreement and the third with the aid of a ureteral catheter as a visual reference. Similar estimates were made with a flexible ureteroscope on papillary lesions within an inorganic upper urinary tract model. Differences in mean estimates and the agreement between repeated estimates were assessed. RESULTS: The level of endoscopic training did not influence the mean error of estimation (MEE) for either cystoscopy or ureteroscopy regardless of lesion size and appearance. Staff and learners consistently underestimated lesion size with median errors of 34% and 43%, with excellent (median intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] of 0.97) and fair (median ICC of 0.56) reproducibility for cystoscopy and ureteroscopy, respectively. Use of the visual reference during cystoscopy did not improve the MEE. CONCLUSIONS: Urologists, regardless of their level of training, substantially underestimate lesion size by 34% to 43%. These findings are independent of lesion size and appearance, and the use of a visual reference during cystoscopy. Recognizing this tendency and adjusting estimates accordingly or improving instrumentation should improve clinical and operative decision-making.
