The benefit of active management in true knot of the umbilical cord: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To compare perinatal outcomes between active and routine management in true knot of the umbilical cord (TKUC). METHODS: A retrospective study of singletons born beyond 22 6/7 weeks with TKUC. Active management included weekly fetal heart rate monitoring(FHRM) ≥ 30 weeks and labor induction at 36-37 weeks. Outcomes in active and routine management were compared, including composite asphyxia-related adverse outcome, fetal death, labor induction, Cesarean section (CS) or Instrumental delivery due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR), Apgar5 score < 7, cord Ph < 7, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and more. RESULTS: The Active (n = 59) and Routine (n = 1091) Management groups demonstrated similar rates of composite asphyxia-related adverse outcome (16.9% vs 16.8%, p = 0.97). Active Management resulted in higher rates of labor induction < 37 weeks (22% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001), CS (37.3% vs 19.2%, p = 0.003) and NICU admissions (13.6% vs 3%, p < 0.001). Fetal death occurred exclusively in the Routine Management group (1.8% vs 0%, p = 0.6). CONCLUSION: Compared with routine management, weekly FHRM and labor induction between 36 and 37 weeks in TKUC do not appear to reduce neonatal asphyxia. In its current form, active management is associated with higher rates of CS, induced prematurity and NICU admissions. Labor induction before 37 weeks should be avoided.

Umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunt and intrauterine growth restriction: an inquiry from a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The investigation of the fetal umbilical-portal venous system is based on the premise that congenital anomalies of this system may be related to adverse perinatal outcomes. Several small retrospective studies have reported an association between umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts and intrauterine growth restriction. However, the prevalence of portosystemic shunts in the fetal growth restricted population is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were (1) to determine the prevalence of fetal umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction and (2) to compare the perinatal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction with and without umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study of pregnancies diagnosed with intrauterine growth restriction, as defined by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine intrauterine growth restriction guidelines. All participants underwent a detailed anomaly scan, supplemented with a targeted scan of the fetal portal system. Venous shunts were diagnosed using color Doppler mode. The perinatal outcomes of pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction with and without umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts were compared. RESULTS: A total of 150 cases with intrauterine growth restriction were recruited. The prevalence of umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts in our cohort was 9.3% (n=14). When compared with the control group (intrauterine growth restriction without umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts, n=136), the study group had a significantly lower mean gestational age at the time of intrauterine growth restriction diagnosis (29.7±5.6 vs 32.47±4.6 weeks of gestation; P=.036) and an earlier gestational age at delivery (33.50±6.0 vs 36.13±2.8; P=.005). The study group had a higher rate of fetal death (21.4% vs 0.7%; P<.001) and, accordingly, a lower rate of live births (71.4% vs 95.6%; P=.001). Additional associated fetal vascular anomalies were significantly more prevalent in the study group than in the control group (35.7% vs 4.4%; P≤.001). The rate of other associated anomalies was similar. The study group had a significantly lower rate of abnormal uterine artery Doppler indices (0% vs 40.4%; P=.011) and a higher rate of abnormal ductus venosus Doppler indices (64.3% vs 23%; P=.001). There were no cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the study group, whereas the control group had an incidence of 12.5% (P=.16). Other perinatal and neonatal outcomes were comparable. CONCLUSION: Umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunt is a relatively common finding among fetuses with growth restriction. When compared with pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction with a normal portal system, these pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction and an umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunt are associated with a different Doppler flow pattern, an increased risk for fetal death, earlier presentation of intrauterine growth restriction, a lower gestational age at delivery, additional congenital vascular anomalies, and a lower rate of pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders. Meticulous sonographic evaluation of the portal system should be considered in the prenatal workup of intrauterine growth restriction, as umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts may affect perinatal outcomes.

In-utero evaluation of the fetal umbilical-portal venous system among fetuses with persistent right umbilical vein: Two-and three-dimensional ultrasonographic study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomy of the portal system in fetuses with persistent right umbilical vein (PRUV). METHODS: Prospective observational study of fetuses diagnosed with PRUV. All patients underwent a comprehensive portal system anatomy scan supplemented by two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) color doppler modalities. RESULTS: 29 fetuses with PRUV were studied. We perceived an identical anatomical pattern in 28 fetuses. The right umbilical vein drains to the portal sinus (future right portal vein, RPV), which has a configuration of a left portal vein (LPV) in the normal left portal system, with three emerging branches: inferior (RPVi), medial (RPVm) and superior (RPVs). The RPV then courses to the left, towards the stomach to the point of the bifurcation of the main portal vein (MPV) to become the left portal vein. The LPV has an RPV configuration in a normal portal system with anterior (LPVa) and posterior (RPVp) branches. This anatomical layout mimics a mirror image of the normal anatomy of left portal system. CONCLUSION: PRUV has unique umbilical portal venous anatomy, which is a mirror image of the normal left portal system. It can be demonstrated prenatally and serve as an additional tool for prenatal diagnosis of PRUV.

The Hard Palate Sweep: a multiplanar 2-dimensional sonographic method for the prenatal detection of cleft palate.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal diagnosis of cleft palate is challenging. Numerous 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional methods have been proposed to assess the integrity of the fetal palate, yet detection rates remain relatively low. We propose the "Hard Palate Sweep," a novel 2-dimensional method that enables clear demonstration of the entire fetal palate throughout pregnancy, in a single sweep, avoiding acoustic shadows cast by surrounding bones. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and performance of the Hard Palate Sweep, performed throughout pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cross-sectional study performed between 2018 and 2022 in pregnant patients referred for a routine or targeted anomaly scan between 13 and 40 weeks of gestation. The presence or absence of a cleft palate was determined using the "Hard Palate Sweep." This was compared with the postnatal palate integrity assessment. Test feasibility and performance indices, including sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Offline clips were reviewed by 2 investigators for the assessment of inter- and intraoperator agreement, using Cohen's kappa formula. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee. All participating patients were informed and provided consent. RESULTS: A total of 676 fetuses were included in the study. The Hard Palate Sweep was successfully performed in all cases, and 19 cases were determined to have a cleft palate. Of these, 13 cases were excluded because postmortem confirmation was not performed, leaving 663 cases available for analysis. Six cases determined to have a cleft palate were confirmed postnatally. In 655 of 657 cases prenatally determined to have an intact palate, this was confirmed postnatally. In the 2 remaining cases, rare forms of cleft palate were diagnosed postnatally, rendering 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 99.7% negative predictive value for the Hard Palate Sweep (P<.001). There was complete intra- and interoperator agreement (kappa=1; P<.0001). CONCLUSION: The Hard Palate Sweep is a feasible and accurate method for prenatally detecting a cleft palate. It was successfully performed in all attempted cases between 13 and 40 weeks of gestation. This method is reproducible, offering high sensitivity and specificity. Implemented routinely, the Hard Palate Sweep is expected to increase the prenatal detection of cleft palate.

The prenatal detection of distal tracheoesophageal fistulas in fetuses diagnosed with esophageal atresia.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal atresia is a major anomaly of varying severity. The complexity of surgical correction depends on the presence of a distal fistula. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the feasibility and accuracy of prenatal ultrasound detection of the distal fistula in fetuses diagnosed with esophageal atresia. STUDY DESIGN: This was an observational study conducted at a single tertiary care center between 2019 and 2021. Included were pregnant patients carrying a fetus prenatally diagnosed with esophageal atresia that was confirmed postnatally during corrective surgery or at postmortem autopsy. During the scan, the performing investigator determined the presence or absence of a distal fistula by scanning the location of the lower esophagus during fetal breathing. Cases in which the lower esophagus was observed distending with amniotic fluid during breathing were deemed "fistula present," and the remaining cases "fistula absent." Test feasibility and performance indices, including sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were calculated. The offline clips and images were reviewed by 2 investigators for the assessment of interoperator agreement using Cohen's Kappa formula. RESULTS: Included were 16 fetuses with esophageal atresia scanned between 2019 and 2021. All fetuses were successfully scanned with sufficient resolution of the area of interest during at least 3 cycles of breathing. It took a median of 8.5 minutes to determine the presence or absence of a distal fistula. The feasibility of the test was 100% (16/16). The test's sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 80% (95% confidence interval, 55-100), 100% (95% confidence interval, 60-100), 100% (95% confidence interval, 65-100), and 75% (95% confidence interval, 45-100), respectively. The Cohen's Kappa for interoperator agreement was calculated to be 1, P<.001, corresponding to a "perfect" level of agreement. CONCLUSION: Distal fistulas in esophageal atresia can be demonstrated prenatally by targeted scanning using appropriate technique. The method provided is feasible, reproducible, and has excellent performance indices. This novel technique and observations may improve the prenatal diagnosis and counseling of esophageal atresia.

[PERINEAL TEARS THAT INVOLVE THE ANAL SPHINCTER - IS IT AN UNPREVENTABLE OBSTETRIC PROBLEM AND WHAT ARE ITS REPRECUSSIONS?]

INTRODUCTION: Perineal tears that involve the anal sphincter, especially those which are occult, are common in cases of vaginal delivery or instrumental deliveries. Parturients who experience such types of perineal tears may suffer from flatus or fecal incontinence and also fistula to various surrounding organs. There is no consensus in the relevant medical literature regarding the risk factors for the development of these tears, as contradictive results are presented in various relevant studies. Traditional methods for perineal protection, executed by midwives, such as perineal massage with oil, have also failed to be proven as an effective measure for that purpose. The only theme on which there appears to be a consensus is the fact that protective episiotomy is not helpful in protecting the perineum during vaginal delivery. The inability to predict which parturient will have a perineal tear that involves the anal sphincter, as well as the lack of predictive measures to avoid their occurrence, drive more and more women to demand and receive cesarean section by maternal request, which is accepted by most obstetricians nowadays.