Melanoma Prevention: Comparison of Different Screening Methods for the Selection of a High Risk Population.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend limiting melanoma screening in a population with known risk factors, but none indicates methods for efficient recruitment. The purpose of this study is to compare three different methods of recruiting subjects to be screened for melanoma to detect which, if any, is the most efficient. METHODS: From 2010 to 2019, subjects were recruited as follows: (1) regular skin examinations (RS), mainly conducted through the Associazione Contro il Melanoma network; (2) occasional melanoma screening (OS), during annual public campaigns; (3) and selective screening (SS), where people were invited to undergo a skin check after filling in a risk evaluation questionnaire, in cases where the assigned outcome was intermediate/high risk. Melanoma risk factors were compared across different screening methods. Generalized Linear Mixed Models were used for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2238 subjects (62.7% women) were recruited, median age 44 years (2-85), and 1094 (48.9 %) records were collected through RS, 826 (36.9 %) through OS, and 318 (14.2 %) through SS. A total of 131 suspicious non-melanoma skin cancers were clinically diagnosed, 20 pathologically confirmed, and 2 melanomas detected. SS performed significantly better at selecting subjects with a family history of melanoma and I-II phototypes compared to OS. CONCLUSIONS: Prior evaluation of melanoma known risk factors allowed for effective selection of a population to screen at higher risk of developing a melanoma.

Malignancies within rhinophyma: report of three new cases and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Rhinophyma, which represents the end stage of rosacea, is characterized by sebaceous hyperplasia, fibrosis follicular plugging, and telangiectasia. Although it is commonly labeled as an aesthetic problem, it may also determine airway obstruction and because of its nature to hide the growth of tumors. Due to the increasing number of reports of nonmelanoma skin types of cancer within rhinophyma, further concern about a higher incidence of malignancies in rhinophyma than in the skin of normal noses is reasonable. METHODS: We describe three male patients who developed malignancies (2 basal and 1 squamous cell carcinoma) associated with rhinophyma disease. The tumors developed over a mean of 23.3 years after primary diagnosis of rhinophyma. One case had a previous history of facial skin tumor. Surgical excision with clear margins allowed resolution in all three patients with a mean follow-up of 34.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: These three new cases and the review of 43 cases reported in the literature call attention to the clinical features of carcinomas arising in the context of rhinophyma, raising further concerns about the possible association between these two entities. The need for histologic examination of all surgically removed tissue in patients with rhinophyma is highlighted. Several macroscopic changes, including ulceration, drainage, and a rapid growth pattern, should alarm the physician and should be considered as suspicious of a malignant degeneration. Unexpected clinical modifications of a preexisting long-lasting silent rhinophyma could indicate the possibility of hidden malignancy rather than a rhinophyma itself. Although evidence of an association between the two entities remains inconclusive, half of the malignancies reported in our review were incidental findings associated with rhinophyma. Thus, since rhinophyma should not be considered solely a cosmetic problem, we recommend that all specimens be reviewed by a pathologist and if malignancy is diagnosed, re-excision with clear margins should be achieved when necessary with periodic follow-up.

Malignant melanoma of the nasal septum.

Primary malignant melanoma involving the nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa is a rare neoplasm, accounting for less than 1% of all melanomas. Being more aggressive than its cutaneous counterpart, it carries a poor prognosis. We report a case arising from the nasal septum mucosae in a 78-year-old man. We describe clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of this rare disease along with a review of the pertinent literature. Endoscopic resection of the neoplasm was performed, enabling diagnosis of sinonasal mucosal melanoma involving the frontal sinus floor. Because the patient was too compromised to achieve radical surgical approach (craniofacial resection), he underwent radiation therapy. Through this article, we wish to emphasize that early diagnosis with a high index of suspicion is critical because this type of tumor is extremely aggressive. Its location and relatively nonspecific features frequently delay diagnosis, and its rarity avoids an optimal treatment guideline setting.