Implementation of a combined Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Treatment Escalation Plan document in a District General Hospital.

Documentation of appropriate escalation of treatment was identified as a problem for junior doctors and Critical Care Outreach Nurses at Musgrove Park Hospital. An audit of resuscitation and escalation documentation of all wards found that of the patients who were not for Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (and therefore not for full escalation of care), 78.4% had no documentation of the appropriate level of escalation of treatment should they deteriorate. The majority of junior doctors had experienced cases where they felt that inappropriate treatment had been given, where no escalation plan was documented. Using several Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles, drawing tools used in other trusts and departments, and the views of clinicians, we developed a treatment escalation plan (TEP) tool, to be included in the resuscitation form. This included consideration of referral to critical care, ward based non-invasive ventilation, and appropriate use of intravenous or oral antibiotics. This then prompted the responsible clinician to consider and document appropriate escalation of treatment. The CPR-TEP form was trialed using a quasi-experiment design allowing the aim to be tested using two groups - intervention and control. All patients in the intervention group were not for CPR and therefore had their TEP-CPR form filled in fully (n=68). The control group consisted of patients who were not for CPR but who did not have a TEP form filled in (n=36). The appropriateness of OOH (out of hours) treatment in those patients who experienced clinical deterioration was judged by questionnaire-based feedback from the in-hours team the following morning. Levels of inappropriate treatment between the two groups were compared to test the aim. At the end of the study period, questionnaire feedback indicated that 11.1% of patients in the group with the new CPR-TEP document had received inappropriate OOH care compared to 44.4% of patients in the group without the document. Using the TEP alongside resuscitation documentation prompts the responsible clinician to consistently consider and document the appropriate escalation of care for their patient, improving communication with the out of hours team and appropriate escalation of care in the event of patient deterioration.

How patients choose osteopaths: a mixed methods study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how patients choose individual osteopaths to consult; to test whether patients' preferences for osteopaths depend on gender, the osteopath's qualifications, and the cost of treatment; to explore patients' perspectives. DESIGN: An explanatory mixed methods design incorporating a quasi-experimental study administered by postal survey and a qualitative interview study. SETTING: One sample of patients at a private-sector complementary therapy clinic in the UK completed a survey; a second sample of patients recruited from osteopathy clinics took part in qualitative interviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In the survey, male and female respondents (n=176) rated the likelihood of consulting each of 8 fictional osteopaths, representing all possible combinations of 3 factors (practitioner gender, biomedically qualified or not, working in a public sector or private clinic). Semi-structured qualitative interviews (n=19) about patients' experiences of osteopathy were analysed deductively and inductively. RESULTS: Survey respondents preferred osteopaths who were also biomedical doctors, F(1,174)=67.21, p<0.001, η(2)=0.28. Qualitative data showed that, when choosing an osteopath, patients valued personal recommendations from a trusted source and such recommendations overrode other considerations. First impressions were important and were based on patients' perceptions of an osteopath's competence, interpersonal fit, and immediate treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS: Word of mouth appears to be the primary mechanism by which patients choose individual osteopaths; in the absence of personal recommendations, some patients prefer biomedically qualified practitioners. Trustworthy and appropriate information about practitioners (e.g. from professional regulatory bodies) could empower patients to make confident choices when seeking individual complementary practitioners to consult.

NADPH oxidase 1 mediates upregulation of thromboxane A2 synthase in human vascular smooth muscle cells: inhibition with iloprost.

Thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) upregulates and activates NADPH oxidase (Nox) both of which are associated with cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study, therefore, was to investigate the relationship between thromboxane A(2) synthase (TXAS) status and Nox in human vascular smooth muscle cells (hVSMCs), in particular, whether superoxide (O(2)(▪-)) derived from Nox influences TXAS expression and activity. hVSMCs were incubated with TNFα: (10 ng/ml), TXA(2) mimetic U46619 (100 nM), 8-isoprostane F(2α) (8-IP; 100 nM) and hypoxia. Expression of TXAS was assessed using western blotting and quantitative PCR. The role of Nox1 and Nox4 was studied using apocynin and mRNA silencing. The effect of the thromboxane receptor antagonist picotamide and of iloprost, a prostacyclin (PGI(2)) analogue was also studied. TNF-α, U46619 and 8-IP and hypoxia all augmented TXAS expression as well as TXA(2) formation, effects inhibited by apocynin. Nox-1 (but not Nox4) gene silencing inhibited the increase in TXAS expression and activity. Both picotamide and iloprost inhibited the upregulation of TXAS as well as TXA(2) formation induced by TNF-α, U46619 and 8-isoprostane F(2α) and hypoxia. It is concluded that upregulation of TXA(2) synthase expression and activity in human VSMCs is mediated by an a priori upregulation of Nox1 and represents a self amplifying cascade. The inhibition of this effect with iloprost consolidates that PGI(2) plays a protective anti-oxidative role in the vasculature and that picotamide and like drugs may be effective in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease associated with an oxidative aetiology.

How patients choose acupuncturists: a mixed-methods project.

OBJECTIVES: Patients can have difficulties choosing acupuncturists in the United Kingdom because acupuncturists are not all subject to statutory regulation. Research has identified factors that influence patients' choice of general practitioner. However, how patients choose acupuncturists has not been studied. The aim was to investigate how patients choose acupuncturists and to identify which factors might influence this choice. DESIGN: A mixed-methods design used an exploratory qualitative study followed by a quantitative study. The qualitative study explored patients' experiences of acupuncture. The quantitative vignette study investigated the impact of patient gender and practitioner factors (gender, training location, and qualifications) on choice of acupuncturist. METHODS: In the qualitative study, 35 acupuncture patients (recruited through maximum variation sampling from seven clinics and the community) participated in semistructured interviews about their acupuncture experiences. In the quantitative study, 73 participants imagined wanting to consult an acupuncturist for back pain. They rated 8 fictional acupuncturists; ratings were analyzed using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Patients wanted qualified, personable acupuncturists and valued recommendations from trusted others. Without such recommendations, potential patients preferred female acupuncturists (F(1,69)=4.504, p<0.05) and those with medical qualifications (F(1,69)=44.832, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The decision to consult a particular acupuncturist is not straightforward. Acupuncturists' trustworthiness and technical competence are important to (potential) patients; practitioner gender also influenced preferences. Patients need to be informed about proposals concerning statutory regulation in CAM and its implications; conventional practitioners might be able to better support their patients wanting to consult acupuncturists.