External validation of the lung-molGPA to predict survival in patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the era of personalized medicine, individualized prognostic models with tumor characteristics are needed to inform patients about survival. Before clinical use, external validation of such models by an independent group is needed. An updated version of the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) estimates survival in patients with brain metastases (BMs) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This is the first external validation of the updated Lung-molGPA in patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for one or more BMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with SRT for BMs from NSCLC adenocarcinoma were retrospectively included. GPA score was calculated for each patient based on six prognostic factors including age, Karnofsky Performance Status, number of BMs, extracranial metastases, EGFR/ALK status, and PD-L1 expression. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated survival probability. Impact of individual prognostic factors on survival was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazard model. Predictive performance was evaluated using discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration (Brier test). RESULTS: The cohort (n = 241) was divided into four prognostic groups. Overall median survival was 15 months. Predicted and observed median survival were similar between the original and validation cohorts, apart from the most favorable prognostic group. With adequate C-statistics and Brier scores, the Lung-molGPA provided accurate survival predictions. CONCLUSION: The Lung-molGPA accurately predicted survival in our European population, except for an overestimation of survival in the small most favorable prognostic group. This prognostic model was externally validated and is therefore useful for counseling of patients with BMs of NSCLC adenocarcinoma.

Development and evaluation of an automated EPTN-consensus based organ at risk atlas in the brain on MRI.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During radiotherapy treatment planning, avoidance of organs at risk (OARs) is important. An international consensus-based delineation guideline was recently published with 34 OARs in the brain. We developed an MR-based OAR autosegmentation atlas and evaluated its performance compared to manual delineation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anonymized cerebral T1-weighted MR scans (voxel size 0.9 × 0.9 × 0.9 mm3) were available. OARs were manually delineated according to international consensus. Fifty MR scans were used to develop the autosegmentation atlas in a commercially available treatment planning system (Raystation®). The performance of this atlas was tested on another 40 MR scans by automatically delineating 34 OARs, as defined by the 2018 EPTN consensus. Spatial overlap between manual and automated delineations was determined by calculating the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Two radiation oncologists determined the quality of each automatically delineated OAR. The time needed to delineate all OARs manually or to adjust automatically delineated OARs was determined. RESULTS: DSC was ≥ 0.75 in 31 (91 %) out of 34 automated OAR delineations. Delineations were rated by radiation oncologists as excellent or good in 29 (85 %) out 34 OAR delineations, while 4 were rated fair (12 %) and 1 was rated poor (3 %). Interobserver agreement between the radiation oncologists ranged from 77-100 % per OAR. The time to manually delineate all OARs was 88.5 minutes, while the time needed to adjust automatically delineated OARs was 15.8 minutes. CONCLUSION: Autosegmentation of OARs enables high-quality contouring within a limited time. Accurate OAR delineation helps to define OAR constraints to mitigate serious complications and helps with the development of NTCP models.

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using External Beam or Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy: 5-Year Oncological Outcomes of a Prospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after 2 accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques (intraoperative electron radiation therapy [IOERT] and external beam APBI [EB-APBI]) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2011 and 2016, women ≥60 years of age with breast carcinoma or Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of ≤30 mm and cN0 undergoing breast-conserving therapy were included in a 2-armed prospective multicenter cohort study. IOERT (1 × 23.3 Gy prescribed at the 100% isodose line) was applied in 1 hospital and EB-APBI (10 × 3.85 Gy daily) in 2 other hospitals. The primary endpoint was IBTR (all recurrences in the ipsilateral breast irrespective of localization) at 5 years after lumpectomy. A competing risk model was used to estimate the cumulative incidences of IBTR, which were compared using Fine and Gray's test. Secondary endpoints were locoregional recurrence rate, distant recurrence, disease-specific survival and overall survival. Univariate Cox regression models were estimated to identify risk factors for IBTR. Analyses were performed of the intention to treat (ITT) population (IOERT n = 305; EB-APBI n = 295), and sensitivity analyses were done of the per-protocol population (IOERT n = 270; EB-APBI n = 207). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 5.2 years (IOERT) and 5 years (EB-APBI). Cumulative incidence of IBTR in the ITT population at 5 years after lumpectomy was 10.6% (95% confidence interval, 7.0%-14.2%) after IOERT and 3.7% (95% confidence interval, 1.2%-5.9%) after EB-APBI (P = .002). The locoregional recurrence rate was significantly higher after IOERT than EB-APBI (12.1% vs 4.5%, P = .001). There were no differences between groups in other endpoints. Sensitivity analysis showed similar results. For both groups, no significant risk factors for IBTR were identified in the ITT population. In the per-protocol population, surgical margin status of the DCIS was the only significant risk factor for developing IBTR in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences and locoregional recurrence rates were unexpectedly high in patients treated with IOERT, and acceptable in patients treated with EB-APBI.

Prognostic factors of local control and disease free survival in centrally located non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) results in high local control (LC) rates in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For central lung tumors, risk-adapted fractionation schedules are used and underdosage to the Planned Target Volume (PTV) is often accepted to respect the dose constraints of the organs at risk in order to avoid high rates of toxicity. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of PTV underdosage and other possible prognostic factors on local- and disease control after SBRT in patients with central lung tumors.Material and Methods: Patients with centrally located NSCLC treated with SBRT were included. The doses were converted into biologically equivalent dose using α/ß-value of 10 Gy (BED10). Underdosage to the PTV was defined as the (percentage of) PTV receiving less than 100 Gy BED10; (%)PTV < 100 BED10. Potential prognostic factors for LC and Disease Free Survival (DFS) were evaluated using Cox regression analysis.Results: Two hundred and twenty patients received ≤12 fractions of SBRT. LC-rates were 88% at 2 years and 81% at 3 years. Twenty-seven patients developed a local recurrence. Both the PTV < 100 BED10 and %PTV < 100 BED10 were not prognostic for LC. Tumor size and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were independently prognostic for LC. Disease progression was reported in 75 patients with DFS-rates of 66% at 2 years and 56% at 3 years. Disease recurrence was independent significantly associated with larger tumor diameter, lower lobe tumor location and decreased FEV1. Grade 4-5 toxicity was reported in 10 patients (8 with ultra-central tumors) and was fatal in at least 3 patients.Conclusion: Decrease in tumor coverage was not correlated with the local recurrence probability. The LC and DFS were promising after SBRT of centrally located NSCLC with tumor size, FEV1 and tumor location (for DFS only) as prognostic factors.

Lower doses to hippocampi and other brain structures for skull-base meningiomas with intensity modulated proton therapy compared to photon therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy of skull-base meningiomas is challenging due to the close proximity of multiple sensitive organs at risk (OARs). This study systematically compared intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on automated treatment planning. Differences in OARs sparing, with specific focus on the hippocampi, and low-dose delivery were quantified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients, target diameter >3 cm, were included. Automated plan generation was used to calculate a VMAT plan with three non-coplanar arcs, an IMRT plan with nine non-coplanar beams with optimized gantry and couch angles, and an IMPT plan with three patient-specific selected non-coplanar beams. A prescription dose of 50.4 GyRBE in 28 fractions was used. The same set of constraints and prioritized objectives was used. All plans were rescaled to the same target coverage. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess the statistical significance of differences in OAR dose parameters between planning techniques. RESULTS: Compared to VMAT and IMRT, IMPT significantly improved dose conformity to the target volume. Consequently, large dose reductions in OARs were observed. With respect to VMAT, the mean dose and D40% in the bilateral hippocampus were on average reduced by 48% and 74%, respectively (p ≤ 0.005). With IMPT, the mean dose in the normal brain and volumes receiving 20-30 Gy were up to 47% lower (p ≤ 0.01). When comparing IMPT and IMRT, even larger dose differences in those OARs were observed. CONCLUSION: For skull-base meningiomas IMPT allows for a considerable dose reduction in the hippocampi, normal brain and other OARs compared to both non-coplanar VMAT and IMRT, which may lead to a clinically relevant reduction of late neurocognitive side effects.

Predicting High-Grade Esophagus Toxicity After Treating Central Lung Tumors With Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Using a Normal Tissue Complication Probability Model.

PURPOSE: The treatment of central lung tumors with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is challenged by the risk of excessive esophageal toxicity. To improve clinical decision making, we aimed to derive normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models in a patient cohort with central lung tumors treated with SBRT and to evaluate the currently used esophagus dose constraints. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with a central lung tumor who received SBRT (8 fractions of 7.5 Gy or 12 fractions of 5 Gy) were included. Doses were recalculated to an equivalent dose of 2 Gy with an α/ß-ratio of 10 Gy for acute and 3 Gy for late toxicity (the cut-off was 3 months). The esophagus was manually delineated. NTCP modeling based on logistic regression was used to relate dose-volume histogram parameters (Dmax, D1cc, D2cc, D5cc) to acute and late toxicity. Parameters with a P < .05 were included in the model. Based on the NTCP models, we determined the probability of toxicity for the currently used dose constraints: D1cc ≤40 Gy for 8 fractions and D1cc ≤48 Gy for 12 fractions. RESULTS: For this study, 188 patients with 203 tumors were eligible. Esophagus toxicity occurred in 33 patients (18%). Late high-grade toxicity consisted of 2 possible treatment-related deaths (grade 5) and 2 patients with grade 3 toxicity. Acute toxicity consisted of only grade 1 (n = 19) and grade 2 toxicity (n = 10). All investigated dose-volume histogram parameters were significantly correlated to acute and late toxicity. The probability of late high-grade toxicity is 1.1% for 8 fractions and 1.4% for 12 fractions when applying the current dose constraints. CONCLUSIONS: High-grade esophageal toxicity occurred in 2.1% of the patients, including 2 possible treatment-related deaths. The currently used dose constraints correspond to a low risk of high-grade toxicity.

The influence of a six degrees of freedom couch and an individual head support in patient positioning in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer.

Reproducible patient positioning is important in radiotherapy (RT) of head-and-neck cancer. We therefore compared set-up errors in head-and-neck RT resulting from three different patient positioning systems. Patients were either treated with a standard head support (SHS) and conventional treatment couch (SHS-3, n = 10), a SHS and rotational couch (SHS-6, n = 10), or an individual head support (IHS) and rotational couch (IHS-6, n = 10). Interfraction mean translation vector lenghts were significantly lower for IHS-6 compared to SHS-3 (0.8 ±â€¯0.3 mm vs. 1.4 ±â€¯0.7 mm, P = 0.001). Intrafraction displacement was comparable among cohorts. This study showed that the use of a six degrees of freedom couch combined with an IHS in head-and-neck RT resulted in better interfraction reproducibility.

Timed Get Up and Go Test and Geriatric 8 Scores and the Association With (Chemo-)Radiation Therapy Noncompliance and Acute Toxicity in Elderly Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the Geriatric 8 (G8) and the Timed Get Up and Go Test (TGUGT) and clinical and demographic patient characteristics were associated with acute toxicity of radiation therapy and noncompliance in elderly cancer patients being irradiated with curative intent. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were eligible if aged ≥65 years and diagnosed with breast, non-small cell lung, prostate, head and neck, rectal, or esophageal cancer, and were referred for curative radiation therapy. We recorded acute toxicity and noncompliance and identified potential predictors, including the G8 and TGUGT. RESULTS: We investigated 402 patients with a median age of 72 years (range, 65-96 years). According to the G8, 44.4% of the patients were frail. Toxicity grade ≥3 was observed in 22% of patients who were frail according to the G8 and 9.1% of patients who were not frail. The difference was 13% (confidence interval 5.2%-20%; P=.0006). According to the TGUGT 18.8% of the patients were frail; 21% of the frail according to the TGUGT developed toxicity grade ≥3, compared with 13% who were not frail. The difference was 7.3% (confidence interval -2.7% to 17%; P=.11). Overall compliance was 95%. Toxicity was most strongly associated with type of primary tumor, chemotherapy, age, and World Health Organization performance status. Compliance was associated with type of primary tumor and age. CONCLUSIONS: The usefulness of the TGUGT and G8 score in daily practice seems to be limited. Type of primary tumor, chemoradiotherapy, age, and World Health Organization performance status were more strongly associated with acute toxicity. Only chemoradiotherapy and age were associated with noncompliance. Overall the compliance was very high. To allow better-informed treatment decisions, a more accurate prediction of toxicity is desirable.

Single dose IOERT versus whole breast irradiation : Cosmetic results in breast-conserving therapy.

BACKGROUND: Scarce data are available about the cosmetic result of single dose intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) in breast-conserving radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 71 breast cancer patients. Breast-conserving surgery and sentinel node procedure had started almost 3 years earlier. Subsequently, 26 patients were treated with IOERT and 45 patients received postoperative whole breast irradiation (WBI). For both groups we determined seven dimensionless asymmetry features. We compared the subjectively and the objectively derived cosmetic scores with each other. RESULTS: For four asymmetry features we noted significantly smaller differences for patients treated with IOERT when compared to those treated with WBI: relative breast contour difference, relative breast area difference and relative breast overlap difference. After correcting for excision volume a significant difference was noticed also for relative lower breast contour. For the IOERT group the cosmetic scores "excellent or good" as determined by each patient and one physician were 88 and 96 %, respectively. When the overall cosmetic scores for patients treated with IOERT and WBI were compared to those of the objectively derived scores, there was a fair level of agreement. CONCLUSION: For patients treated with IOERT we noted less asymmetry and high rates of "good or excellent" subjectively derived cosmetic scores. The level of agreement between the subjectively and the objectively derived cosmetic scores was limited. Due to the small sample size and the design of the study no definitive conclusions can be drawn.

Whole breast proton irradiation for maximal reduction of heart dose in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: In left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy, tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy combined with breath-hold enables a dose reduction to the heart and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Aim of this study was to investigate the added value of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) with regard to decreasing the radiation dose to these structures. METHODS: In this comparative planning study, four treatment plans were generated in 20 patients: an IMPT plan and a tangential IMRT plan, both with breath-hold and free-breathing. At least 97 % of the target volume had to be covered by at least 95 % of the prescribed dose in all cases. Specifically with respect to the heart, the LAD, and the target volumes, we analyzed the maximum doses, the mean doses, and the volumes receiving 5-30 Gy. RESULTS: As compared to IMRT, IMPT resulted in significant dose reductions to the heart and LAD-region even without breath-hold. In the majority of the IMPT cases, a reduction to almost zero to the heart and LAD-region was obtained. IMPT treatment plans yielded the lowest dose to the lungs. CONCLUSIONS: With IMPT the dose to the heart and LAD-region could be significantly decreased compared to tangential IMRT with breath-hold. The clinical relevance should be assessed individually based on the baseline risk of cardiac complications in combination with the dose to organs at risk. However, as IMPT for breast cancer is currently not widely available, IMPT should be reserved for patients remaining at high risk for major coronary events.

Left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy with and without breath-hold: does IMRT reduce the cardiac dose even further?

PURPOSE: In radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer, Active Breathing Control enables a decrease of cardiac and Left Anterior Descending (LAD) coronary artery dose. We compared 3D-Conformal (3D-CRT) to Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans based on free-breathing (FB) and breath-hold (BH). We investigated whether IMRT enables an additional decrease of cardiac dose in radiotherapy plans with and without BH. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients referred for whole breast irradiation were included. The whole breast, heart and LAD-region were contoured. Four treatment plans were generated: FB_3D-CRT; FB_IMRT; BH_3D-CRT; BH_IMRT. Several doses were obtained from Dose Volume Histograms and compared. Results were compared statistically using the Wilcoxin Signed Rank Test. For heart and LAD-region, a significant dose reduction was found in BH (p<0.01). For both BH and FB, a significant dose reduction was found using IMRT (p<0.01). By using IMRT an average reduction of 5% was noted in the LAD-region for the volume receiving 20Gy. In 5 cases, the LAD-region remained situated in the vicinity of the radiation portals even in BH. Nevertheless, with IMRT the LAD dose was reduced in these cases. CONCLUSION: IMRT results in a significant additional decrease of dose in the heart and LAD-region in both breath-hold and free-breathing.

MRI- versus CT-based volume delineation of lumpectomy cavity in supine position in breast-conserving therapy: an exploratory study.

PURPOSE: To examine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) for lumpectomy cavity (LC) volume delineation in supine radiotherapy treatment position and to assess the interobserver variability. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 15 breast cancer patients underwent a planning CT and directly afterward MRI in supine radiotherapy treatment position. Then, 4 observers (2 radiation oncologists and 2 radiologists) delineated the LC on the CT and MRI scans and assessed the cavity visualization score (CVS). The CVS, LC volume, conformity index (CI), mean shift of the center of mass (COM), with the standard deviation, were quantified for both CT and MRI. RESULTS: The CVS showed that MRI and CT provide about equal optimal visibility of the LC. If the CVS was high, magnetic resonance imaging provided more detail of the interfaces of the LC seroma with the unaffected GBT. MRI also pictured in more detail the interfaces of axillary seromas (if present) with their surroundings and their relationship to the LC. Three observers delineated smaller, and one observer larger, LC volumes comparing the MRI- and CT-derived delineations. The mean ± standard deviation CI was 32% ± 25% for MRI and 52% ± 21% for CT. The mean ± standard deviation COM shift was 11 ± 10 mm (range 1-36) for MRI and 4 ± 3 mm (range 1-10) for CT. CONCLUSIONS: MRI does not add additional information to CT in cases in which the CVS is assessed as low. The conformity (CI) is lower for MRI than for CT, especially at a low CVS owing to greater COM shifts for MRI, probably caused by inadequate visibility of the surgical clips on magnetic resonance (MR) images. The COM shifts seriously dictate a decline in the CI more than the variability of the LC volumes does. In cases in which MRI provides additional information, MRI must be combined with the CT/surgical clip data.

Preradiotherapy calcium scores of the coronary arteries in a cohort of women with early-stage breast cancer: a comparison with a cohort of healthy women.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer radiotherapy has been associated with an increased risk of cardiac toxicity. However, no data are available on the probability of developing coronary artery disease (CAD) in breast cancer patients when compared with healthy women. Therefore, baseline coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores, as an accepted tool to predict CAD, were determined and compared with the CAC scores of a healthy, asymptomatic cohort, the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohort. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty consecutive patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or infiltrative breast cancer referred for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery were included in our study. Their cardiovascular risk profile was registered, and a 64 multislice CT scan was performed. The CAC scores of an unselected (Caucasian only) Radiotherapy Centre West (RCWEST) cohort, as well as of those of a selected (comorbidity and race adjusted) RCWEST cohort, were determined. The scores of both cohorts were compared with those of the female (Caucasian only) MESA cohort. RESULTS: For the unselected RCWEST cohort (n = 62) we found significant (p < .01) higher scores for women in the 55-64 age category compared with those of the MESA cohort. In the selected cohort (n = 55) the CAC scores of the women in the age category 55-64 were significantly (p = .02) higher compared with the MESA cohort. No significant differences were noted in the other age categories. CONCLUSION: Both cohorts revealed that CAC scores in the 55-64 age category were significantly higher than the CAC scores in the asymptomatic (female) MESA population. These data suggest that breast cancer patients bear a higher risk of developing coronary heart disease before the start of radiotherapy. Therefore, measures to decrease cardiac dose further in breast cancer radiotherapy are even more important.

Magnetic resonance imaging- versus computed tomography-based target volume delineation of the glandular breast tissue (clinical target volume breast) in breast-conserving therapy: an exploratory study.

PURPOSE: To examine MRI and CT for glandular breast tissue (GBT) volume delineation and to assess interobserver variability. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen breast cancer patients underwent a planning CT and MRI, consecutively, in the treatment position. Four observers (two radiation oncologists and two radiologists) delineated the GBT according to the CT and separately to the MR images. Volumes, centers of mass, maximum extensions with standard deviations (SD), and interobserver variability were quantified. Observers viewed delineation differences between MRI and CT and delineation differences among observers. RESULTS: In cranio-lateral and cranio-medial directions, GBT volumes were delineated larger using MRI when compared with those delineated with CT. Center of mass on MRI shifted a mean (SD) 17% (4%) into the cranial direction and a mean 3% (4%) into the dorsal direction when compared with that on the planning CT. Only small variations between observers were noted. The GBT volumes were approximately 4% larger on MRI (mean [SD] ratio MRI to CT GBT volumes, 1.04 [0.06]). Findings were concordant with viewed MRI and CT images and contours. Conformity indices were only slightly different; mean conformity index was 77% (3%) for MRI and 79% (4%) for CT. Delineation differences arising from personal preferences remained recognizable irrespective of the imaging modality used. CONCLUSIONS: Contoured GBT extends substantially further into the cranio-lateral and cranio-medial directions on MRI when compared with CT. Interobserver variability is comparable for both imaging modalities. Observers should be aware of existing personal delineation preferences. Institutions are recommended to review and discuss target volume delineations and to design supplementary guidelines if necessary.