Trends in use of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers among Medicaid beneficiaries with bipolar disorder, 2001-2004.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined longitudinal trends in the use of mood stabilizers and antipsychotics for treatment of bipolar disorder in a large public mental health system and whether trends differed by age, gender, and race-ethnicity. METHODS: Data were from Medicaid beneficiaries with bipolar disorder receiving services in the San Diego County public mental health system from 2001 to 2004. For each year the proportion of clients receiving any pharmacotherapy and the proportion receiving antipsychotics alone, mood stabilizers alone, or antipsychotics plus mood stabilizers were determined. Pharmacotherapy use was examined by age, gender, and race-ethnicity. RESULTS: A total of 1,473 clients were identified who were continuously enrolled in Medicaid during the four years. Seventy-five percent received mood stabilizers or antipsychotics. Of this group, 33% received antipsychotics alone, 23% mood stabilizers alone, and 44% both antipsychotics and mood stabilizers. The percentage receiving mood stabilizers or antipsychotics increased significantly, from 71% in 2001 to 77% in 2004, primarily because of increased use among women. Use of mood stabilizers alone declined from 25% to 20%, and use of antipsychotics alone increased from 32% to 36%. African Americans and Latinos were less likely than non-Latino whites to receive mood stabilizers or antipsychotics; this pattern was stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotics were prescribed for a larger percentage of clients than mood stabilizers. Persons from ethnic minority groups were less likely to receive either medication type. Research is needed to examine factors affecting pharmacotherapy in bipolar disorder and mechanisms underlying racial-ethnic disparities in pharmacotherapy, including their persistence over time.

Antipsychotic polypharmacy trends among Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia in San Diego County, 1999-2004.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined trends and costs of second-generation antipsychotic polypharmacy among Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia in San Diego County. METHODS: Medicaid data were used to identify 15,962 persons with schizophrenia receiving antipsychotic medications between 1999 and 2004. The yearly proportion of beneficiaries receiving second-generation antipsychotic polypharmacy, duration of polypharmacy, inpatient admissions, and pharmaceutical costs were examined. RESULTS: The proportion of clients receiving second-generation antipsychotic polypharmacy increased from 3.3% in 1999 to 13.7% in 2004, whereas annual antipsychotic medication costs increased from $4,128 to $5,231 (2004 dollars). Among those receiving second-generation polypharmacy, the percentage receiving second-generation polypharmacy for 12 months increased from 5.1% to 14.4%, and the percentage hospitalized increased from 7.2% to 9.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of long-term second-generation antipsychotic polypharmacy and its associated costs increased substantially between 1999 and 2004. Prescribing antipsychotic polypharmacy is an unproven and costly strategy that if left unchanged could lead to administrative efforts to cut costs and dictate practice.

Safety of droperidol in behavioural emergencies.

By the year 2000, droperidol had become a standard drug for the treatment of behavioural emergencies in both psychiatric and medical settings. In 2001, the US FDA issued a 'black box' warning, citing cases of QT prolongation and/or torsades de pointes. As a result, the use of droperidol has been sharply circumscribed. The authors will review the literature on antipsychotic medications in general, focusing on droperidol in particular, with regard to QT interval prolongation, dysrhythmia, and sudden death. In addition, the mechanism of drug-induced QT interval prolongation will be discussed. The authors will then review their extensive experience with droperidol. The authors conclude that, while in theory droperidol may prolong the QT interval to an extent similar to thioridazine, its long history of clinical use has shown no pattern of sudden deaths analogous to those that provoked the FDA warning. Although the numbers presented by the FDA initially appear alarming, after further evaluation it is clear that more definitive studies should have been carried out. Droperidol is safe, extremely effective, and now underused as a treatment for severely agitated or violent patients.

A review of the safety and efficacy of droperidol for the rapid sedation of severely agitated and violent patients.

BACKGROUND: Droperidol had become a standard treatment for sedating severely agitated or violent patients in both psychiatric and medical emergency departments. However, several recent articles have suggested that droperidol may have a quinidine-like effect similar to that of thioridazine in inducing dysrhythmia. METHOD: In view of the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) position regarding the use of thioridazine, the authors reviewed the literature regarding droperidol and dysrhythmia in a MEDLINE search for the years 1960-2002 using the search terms droperidol, dysrhythmia, QTc interval, and sudden death as well as their own experience in using droperidol in a busy psychiatric emergency department. This review was done before the FDA's very recent and peremptory warning about droperidol. RESULTS: The authors report that, in treating approximately 12,000 patients over the past decade, they have never experienced a clinically significant adverse dysrhythmic event using droperidol to sedate severely agitated or violent patients. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that, in clinical practice, droperidol is an extremely effective and safe method for treating severely agitated or violent patients. While in theory droperidol may prolong the QT interval to an extent similar to thioridazine, in clinical use there is no pattern of sudden deaths analogous to those that provoked the FDA warning about thioridazine.