Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 10(9): e4540, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36203737

ABSTRACT

Finger amputations are one of the most common traumas of daily life. Regularization of the digital stump is the most widely used option in the literature today. The aim of this study was to evaluate a valid functional and aesthetic alternative to amputation. Methods: We retrospectively investigated our prospective database' selecting the patients who underwent trimmed great toe flap reconstruction for the amputation of a digit from September 2019 to November 2021. All the operations were performed by the first author (L.T.) in the Reconstructive Microsurgery Service of the University Department of Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation of MultiMedica Group. Results: No flap required anastomosis revision or had major complications. The length of the amputated finger was maintained, with a high functional and aesthetic result achieved. Conclusions: The trimmed great toe flap has proven to be a viable alternative to finger amputation in the reconstruction of thumb and long finger defects, leading to high aesthetic results. The morbidity of the donor site is reduced compared with the classic great toe flap, allowing a direct closure in most cases.

2.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(9)2022 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36143908

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Lipofilling is a commonly performed procedure worldwide for breast augmentation and correction of breast contour deformities. In breast reconstruction, fat grafting has been used as a single reconstructive technique, as well as in combination with other procedures. The aim of the present study is to systematically review available studies in the literature describing the combination of implant-based breast reconstruction and fat grafting, focusing on safety, complications rate, surgical sessions needed to reach a satisfying reconstruction, and patient-reported outcomes. Materials and Methods: We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) throughout the whole review protocol. A systematic review of the literature up to April 2022 was performed using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Only studies dealing with implant-based breast reconstruction combined with fat grafting were included. Results: We screened 292 articles by title and abstract. Only 48 articles were assessed for full-text eligibility, and among those, 12 studies were eventually selected. We included a total of 753 breast reconstructions in 585 patients undergoing mastectomy or demolitive breast surgeries other than mastectomy (quadrantectomy, segmentectomy, or lumpectomy) due to breast cancer or genetic predisposition to breast cancer. Overall, the number of complications was 60 (7.9%). The mean volume of fat grafting per breast per session ranged from 59 to 313 mL. The mean number of lipofilling sessions per breast ranged from 1.3 to 3.2. Conclusions: Hybrid breast reconstruction shows similar short-term complications to standard implant-based reconstruction but with the potential to significantly decrease the risk of long-term complications. Moreover, patient satisfaction was achieved with a reasonably low number of lipofilling sessions (1.7 on average).


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Adipose Tissue/transplantation , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Mammaplasty/methods , Mastectomy/methods , Mastectomy, Segmental , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...