Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 88: 105716, 2024 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38880030

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue is one of the most common, disabling, and least understood symptoms of many chronic health conditions including multiple sclerosis (MS). A multidisciplinary rehabilitative treatment approach is recommended for MS-related fatigue, but few people with MS have access to such treatment. In-person and telehealth cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for fatigue is an emerging acceptable and effective treatment for MS-related fatigue in civilians that has not been studied in Veterans with MS, a population that is more likely to be older, male, unemployed, and disabled. The present study aimed to understand how Veterans with MS (1) describe their fatigue and (2) manage their fatigue, and (3) perceive telehealth CBT for MS-related fatigue. METHOD: Twenty-four Veterans with MS completed semi-structured interviews and a brief survey. For descriptive purposes, the survey included questionnaires on demographics, fatigue, psychosocial functioning, depression, and pain. Thematic analysis with a combined deductive and inductive approach was used to analyze interview transcripts. RESULTS: Three themes emerged. First, "experience of MS fatigue as 'one big tapestry'" described fatigue as deficits in physical and mental energy that were fluctuating and complex in their interaction with biological factors. Veterans described that MS fatigue negatively impacted daily activities of living, emotions, and cognitive functioning. Second, "managing MS fatigue through trial and error" revealed that Veterans expend significant time and effort learning and trialing fatigue management strategies based on their personal beliefs, military training/experiences, provider recommendations, and iterative learning. Most Veterans described energy management, relaxation, exercise, and adaptive thinking as helpful for managing fatigue. Interestingly, the helpfulness of medication for fatigue was highly variable, and none of the Veterans described medication as a standalone fatigue treatment. The third theme, "practicing flexibility with telehealth CBT for MS fatigue" revealed Veteran's enthusiasm about telehealth CBT for MS-related fatigue and highlighted the importance of flexible delivery to meet individual needs. CONCLUSION: Veteran participants shared their experience of MS-related fatigue as well as management strategies that are consistent with previous research in civilians with MS fatigue. Notably, Veterans' preference for flexible nonpharmacological intervention can inform adaptation of telehealth CBT for Veterans with MS fatigue.

2.
Meas Eval Couns Dev ; 56(2): 81-98, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37378000

ABSTRACT

This study developed and psychometrically evaluated a brief measure of mental health treatment knowledge (N = 726). Scores from Knowledge about Treatment (KaT) demonstrated a unidimensional measure with good model fit, internal consistency reliability, convergent and predictive validity, test-retest reliability, and measurement invariance across gender, ethnicity, education, and poverty status.

3.
J Head Trauma Rehabil ; 38(2): 137-146, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36883896

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People of color (POC), especially those who also hold social identities associated with disadvantage (non-English-speaking, female, older, lower socioeconomic level), continue to be underserved in the health system, which can result in poorer care and worsened health outcomes. Most disparity research in traumatic brain injury (TBI) focuses on the impact of single factors, which misses the compounding effect of belonging to multiple historically marginalized groups. OBJECTIVE: To examine the intersectional impact of multiple social identities vulnerable to systemic disadvantage following TBI on mortality, opioid usage during acute hospitalization, and discharge location. METHODS: Retrospective observational design utilizing electronic health records merged with local trauma registry data. Patient groups were defined by race and ethnicity (POC or non-Hispanic White), age, sex, type of insurance, and primary language (English-speaking vs non-English-speaking). Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to identify clusters of systemic disadvantage. Outcome measures were then assessed across latent classes and tested for differences. RESULTS: Over an 8-year period, 10 809 admissions with TBI occurred (37% POC). LCA identified a 4-class model. Groups with more systemic disadvantage had higher rates of mortality. Classes with older populations had lower rates of opioid administration and were less likely to discharge to inpatient rehabilitation following acute care. Sensitivity analyses examining additional indicators of TBI severity demonstrated that the younger group with more systemic disadvantage had more severe TBI. Controlling for more indicators of TBI severity changed statistical significance in mortality for younger groups. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate significant health inequities in the mortality and access to inpatient rehabilitation following TBI along with higher rates of severe injury in younger patients with more social disadvantages. While many inequities may be related to systemic racism, our findings suggested an additive, deleterious effect for patients who belonged to multiple historically disadvantaged groups. Further research is needed to understand the role of systemic disadvantage for individuals with TBI within the healthcare system.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Intersectional Framework , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Hospitalization , Ethnicity
4.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 10(11): e41689, 2022 11 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36191176

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the general public was concerned about the mental health impacts of unemployment due to COVID-19 and the stress essential workers experienced during this time. Several reports indicated that people in distress were turning to digital technology, but there was little evidence about the impact of these tools on mitigating distress. OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to determine the acceptability, feasibility, usability, and effectiveness of mobile mental health apps for decreasing mental health symptoms in essential workers and unemployed individuals with suicide risk. METHODS: We recruited participants who indicated that they were unemployed because of COVID-19 or were COVID-19-designated essential workers. Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 free commercial mobile apps for managing distress that were (1) highly rated by PsyberGuide and (2) met the criteria for intervention features these participants indicated were desirable in a previous survey. Participants used the apps for 4 weeks and completed baseline and 4-week self-assessments of depression, anxiety emotional regulation, and suicide risk. RESULTS: We found no differences between the apps in any outcome but did find significant changes in depression and anxiety over time (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ]-9: estimate=-1.5, SE 0.2, 95% CI -1.1 to -1.8, P<.001; Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale [GAD]-7: estimate=-1.3, SE 0.2, 95% CI -1.0 to -1.6, P<.001). We found no significant changes in suicidal behavior (Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised [SBQ-R]) or emotional regulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form [DERS-SF]) for the 4 weeks. We did find a significant dose-response pattern for changes in depression and anxiety. Using the app at least once a week resulted in greater improvements in treatment conditions over time on depression (estimate=-0.6, SE 0.2, 95% CI 1.0-0.2, P=.003) and anxiety (estimate=0.1, SE 0.2, 95% CI 0.4-0.6, P=.78). There was no association between app frequency and changes in suicidal behavior (SBQ-R) or emotional regulation (DERS-SF). We further found a significant difference between the conditions with regard to app usability, with the control app being the most usable (meanBeautiful Mood 72.9, SD 16.7; meanCOVID Coach 71.2, SD 15.4; meanCalm 66.8, SD 17.3; mean7 Cups 65.2, SD 17.7). We found no significant differences for app acceptability or appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have evaluated prospectively the utility and usability of commercial apps for mood. This study found that free, self-guided commercial mobile mental health apps are seen as usable, but no one app is superior to the other. Although we found that regular use is indicated for effects on depression and anxiety to occur in those who are more symptomatic, regression to the mean cannot be ruled out. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04536935; https://tinyurl.com/mr36zx3s.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mobile Applications , Humans , Mental Health , Unemployment , Pandemics
5.
Front Psychiatry ; 13: 893073, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36159918

ABSTRACT

Background: Postpartum depression (PPD) affects one in eight women in the U.S., with rates increasing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the unique circumstances of COVID-19, virtual therapy might be a unique way to overcome barriers to mental health services. The study sought to explore the acceptability of virtual therapy among women in the postpartum period. Methods: Using an online recruitment mixed methods approach, we collected data from a U.S. national cross-sectional sample of women (N = 479) who gave birth in the last 12 months. Findings: Results show that 66% of women endorsed items consistent with possible depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Only 27% accessed therapy services during the postpartum period. While 88% were open to engaging in virtual therapy services, 12% identified several major concerns with virtual therapy, namely: (1) preference for in-person therapy (2) no perceived need for therapy (3) uncomfortable with virtual therapy, and (4) lack of privacy. Of note, 36% more Latinas reported dissatisfaction with quality of care received during virtual therapy compared to non-Latina participants. Despite a major shift to virtual care with COVID-19, future work is needed to make virtual mental health services more accessible for women with PPD.

6.
Am J Orthopsychiatry ; 92(5): 635-645, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35617246

ABSTRACT

The present study is a secondary analysis that tested whether difficulties with emotion regulation (DER) would statistically mediate cultural risk factors of suicide and depression symptoms or suicidal behaviors among (a) Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) and (b) lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals. BIPOC (n = 246), and LGBTQ (n = 203) participants completed measures on cultural risk factors of suicide, DER, depression symptoms, and suicidal behaviors at three time points from a larger remote randomized controlled trial (RCT). Simple and parallel mediation explored whether there were indirect effects of cultural risk of suicide on depression or suicidal behaviors via DER. Hypotheses were partially supported: simple mediation revealed that cultural risk factors of suicide at Time 1 predicted only depression symptoms at Time 3 via DER at Time 2 among BIPOC (indirect effect = .09, SE = .04, 95% CI [.01, .17]) and LGBTQ individuals (indirect effect = .05, SE = .02, 95% CI [.02, 08]). Parallel mediation revealed an indirect effect of cultural stressors of suicide and depression via lack of emotional awareness, difficulty with goal-directed behavior, and difficulty accessing emotion regulation strategies for BIPOC, whereas it was via difficulties with goal-directed behavior for LGBTQ persons. With replication, these findings support the importance of cultural risk factors when screening for suicide and inform tailoring of psychosocial interventions targeting emotion regulation with BIPOC and LGBTQ individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Emotional Regulation , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Suicide , Bisexuality/psychology , Female , Humans , Risk Factors , Suicide/psychology
7.
Burns ; 48(2): 345-354, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34903410

ABSTRACT

Research supports that people of color in the U.S. have poorer outcomes after burn injury compared to White individuals. The current study sought to explore burn health disparities by testing the relationship between racial and ethnic minority status, a proxy for systemic discrimination due to race and ethnicity, with two key constructs linked to functional outcomes, satisfaction with appearance and social community integration. Participants included 1318 burn survivors from the Burn Model System National Database (mean age = 40.2, SD = 12.7). Participants completed measures of satisfaction with appearance and social community integration at baseline, 6-, 12-, and 24-months after burn injury. Linear regressions revealed that racial and ethnic minority status significantly related to lower satisfaction with appearance and social community integration compared to White individuals at all time points. In addition, satisfaction with appearance continued to significantly relate to greater social community integration even while accounting for race and ethnicity, age, sex, burn size, and physical disability at 6-, 12-, and 24-month time points. Overall, the study supports that racial and ethnic minority burn survivors report greater dissatisfaction with their appearance and lower social community reintegration after burn injury.


Subject(s)
Burns , Ethnicity , Adult , Humans , Independent Living , Minority Groups , Personal Satisfaction , Rehabilitation Research
8.
JMIR Ment Health ; 8(8): e28360, 2021 Aug 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34081592

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has created serious mental health consequences for essential workers or people who have become unemployed as a result of the pandemic. Digital mental health tools have the potential to address this problem in a timely and efficient manner. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to document the extent of digital mental health tool (DMHT) use by essential workers and those unemployed due to COVID-19, including asking participants to rate the usability and user burden of the DMHT they used most to cope. We also explored which aspects and features of DMHTs were seen as necessary for managing stress during a pandemic by having participants design their own ideal DMHT. METHODS: A total of 2000 people were recruited from an online research community (Prolific) to complete a one-time survey about mental health symptoms, DMHT use, and preferred digital mental health features. RESULTS: The final sample included 1987 US residents that identified as either an essential worker or someone who was unemployed due to COVID-19. Almost three-quarters of the sample (1479/1987, 74.8%) reported clinically significant emotional distress. Only 14.2% (277/1957) of the sample used a DMHT to cope with stress associated with COVID-19. Of those who used DMHTs to cope with COVID-19, meditation apps were the most common (119/261, 45.6%). Usability was broadly in the acceptable range, although participants unemployed due to COVID-19 were less likely to report user burden with DMHTs than essential workers (t198.1=-3.89, P<.001). Individuals with emotional distress reported higher financial burden for their DMHT than nondistressed individuals (t69.0=-3.21, P=.01). When the sample was provided the option to build their own DMHT, the most desired features were a combination of mindfulness/meditation (1271/1987, 64.0%), information or education (1254/1987, 63.1%), distraction tools (1170/1987, 58.9%), symptom tracking for mood and sleep (1160/1987, 58.4%), link to mental health resources (1140/1987, 57.4%), and positive psychology (1131/1986, 56.9%). Subgroups by employment, distress, and previous DMHT use status had varied preferences. Of those who did not use a DMHT to cope with COVID-19, most indicated that they did not consider looking for such a tool to help with coping (1179/1710, 68.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the potential need for DMHTs, this study found that the use of such tools remains similar to prepandemic levels. This study also found that regardless of the level of distress or even past experience using an app to cope with COVID-19, it is possible to develop a COVID-19 coping app that would appeal to a majority of essential workers and unemployed persons.

9.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 29(9): 881-894, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33867224

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the emotional distress and loneliness during COVID-19 and the roles of resiliency and activities. DESIGN: A cross-sectional national survey. SETTING: Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk) and Prolific Research Platforms. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred and one U.S. dwelling English-speaking adults 60 years old and older. MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed an online survey with the PHQ-9; GAD-7; Short Health Anxiety Inventory; 3-item UCLA Loneliness scale; PROMIS measures of global health, instrumental, and emotional support; 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale; and COVID-19 needs assessment. RESULTS: Across the sample 13% reported moderate depressive symptoms, 9% reported moderate anxiety symptoms, and 26% endorsed being "lonely." The emotionally distressed group endorsed more loneliness, lower resiliency, less physical exercise, and worse physical health. The low Socio-Economic Status group endorsed less loneliness, less likely to engage in physical exercise and worse physical health.The lonely group endorsed less resilience, less physical exercise, and worse physical health. A multiple logistic regression found that resilience, socioeconomic status, and physical health were significant predictors of loneliness, whereas global health was the best predictor of emotional distress. CONCLUSIONS: Even after prolonged social distancing, older adults in this study did not report greater psychological distress compared to earlier studies of older adults during COVID-19. Older adults with lower SES, worse physical health, and less resiliency, were more likely to report more loneliness. It is this group that should be the focus of intervention.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychological Distress , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression , Humans , Loneliness , Pandemics , Protective Factors , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Am J Orthopsychiatry ; 89(6): 716-726, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30382725

ABSTRACT

Experiencing discrimination or rejection from one's own ethnic group can have adverse effects on mental health above and beyond general ethnic discrimination alone. Intragroup marginalization is a term that involves being marginalized by members of one's own ethnic group for acting in concordance with the mainstream culture (Castillo, Conoley, Brossart, & Quiros, 2007). Minimal research has examined rejection by one's own ethnic group for acting too enculturated to one's home culture, or intragroup separation. In the current study, a community sample of Latina/o adults (N = 233), primarily women of Mexican descent, were recruited and completed self-report surveys. Using 3 hierarchical regressions, results demonstrated that intragroup marginalization and intragroup separation predicted symptoms of depression, anxiety, and alcohol misuse above and beyond that of general ethnic discrimination alone. Moreover, family and ethnic group intragroup marginalization and intragroup separation uniquely predicted different symptoms of mental health. Additional findings suggested that nativity status served as a moderator for intragroup separation and alcohol misuse, such that the relationship strengthened for U.S.-born Latina/os. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health , Social Discrimination/psychology , Social Marginalization/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Mexico/ethnology , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...