Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Breast ; 13(3): 184-7, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15177419

ABSTRACT

The quality of a breast-screening programme is measured not only by it's cancer detection rates (sensitivity), but also by it's recall rates and positive predictive values (specificity). False positive screens, which lead to assessments with benign outcomes, can cause psychological and physical morbidity in previously well women. In 1999 the Wiltshire breast-screening programme adopted a novel recall strategy whereby all films marked for recall are subject to consensus opinion--even women "recalled" by both original readers may be returned to routine screening. Since 1999 our recall rates have fallen from above to below the national averages (prevalent 7.2% and incident 3.0% in 2001/02). Specificity has increased over the same period such that approximately one in seven women assessed will be diagnosed with cancer. The consensus meetings provide a forum for teaching and are very popular with our film readers, who all report reduced levels of stress.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Consensus , Mammography/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL