Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Transplant Proc ; 54(4): 917-924, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35459465

ABSTRACT

Solid graft recipients are at an increased risk of serious complications and death. Out of 130 outpatient recipients of pancreas grafts at our Clinic, 20 patients (15.73%) had a confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection (SARS-CoV-2). Each patient had a different course of the disease, and the forms of infection varied from mild to severe and lethal. According to recommendations, after confirmation of the infection, mycophenolate mofetil was withdrawn and the immunosuppression was based on steroids and a calcineurin inhibitor. In this study, we performed an analysis of the course of COVID-19 infection in patients after pancreatic transplantation. Twenty pancreas recipients were confirmed to have COVID-19 infections; 4 of whom required hospitalization owing to severe complications. Patients reported weakness, excessive intensity of fatigue, shortness of breath with exertion, cough, and periodically increased temperature. Weakness and fatigue persisted in these patients for about 6 weeks. In 2 patients there was a need for oxygen supplementation and empirical antibiotic. Mortality was 5%, and there was 1 graftectomy. Deterioration of either kidney or pancreas graft were not observed in any other patients. The course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid graft recipients is similar to that of the rest of the population. Because of immunosuppression, recipients were accustomed to avoiding crowds and complying with obligations to wear masks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Kidney Transplantation , Fatigue/etiology , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Pancreas , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Transplant Proc ; 54(4): 1183-1188, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35450723

ABSTRACT

A 51-year-old patient with type I diabetes and end-stage renal disease was qualified for a simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant. The procedure was performed in a typical manner: arterial anastomosis to the right common iliac artery, the graft's portal vein with inferior vena cava, and side-to-side duodenal intestinal anastomosis. The kidney was implanted retroperitoneally. Six months after the transplant, the patient reported pain in the right lower abdomen, and imaging examinations revealed arterial anastomosis. Reconstruction of the right common iliac artery was performed with a Gore-Tex prosthesis and the pancreatic artery reanastomosed to the right external iliac artery. After the surgery, the function of the transplanted pancreas deteriorated, the level of C-peptide was decreased, and the patient required low doses of insulin. After another 8 months, the imaging studies revealed an aneurysm located in the bifurcation of the aorta up to the anastomosis of the pancreatic graft artery with the iliac artery. The patient was qualified for the implantation of an endovascular of 2 prosthesis, which improved the graft's function. After another 2 months, the presence of an aneurysm at the endovascular prosthesis was found again. The patient was requalified for endovascular prosthesis implantation. Currently, there is no aneurysm but the function of the pancreas graft is impaired, though the kidney graft function is good. Patients after simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant are a group of patients with an increased risk of vascular complications. Treatment should take place in a multidisciplinary center.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Pancreas Transplantation , Abdomen , Aorta, Abdominal , Humans , Iliac Artery/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Artery/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Middle Aged , Pancreas/blood supply , Pancreas Transplantation/adverse effects
3.
Transplant Proc ; 54(4): 925-929, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35437149

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was a real test of doctors' abilities to adapt and respond to patients' needs. The course of infection varied from influenza-like symptoms to severe infections with multi-organ failure and death. Therefore, the possibility of vaccination against the COVID-19 virus brought great hope. Since 2004, 240 pancreas and pancreas with kidney (simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation, pancreas after kidney, pancreas transplants alone) transplants were performed in our center. Currently, 130 transplant patients are under the care of the transplant clinic. All patients were informed about the possibility of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with the mRNA vaccine. The aim of the study was to evaluate the development of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in patients who had previously undergone transplantation. Fifty-three patients were vaccinated with the full double dose and 37 patients received an additional third dose. The level of antibodies in the IgM and IgG classes was assessed in patients' serum. The level of antibodies was assessed before administration of the vaccine and then after administration of the first and second doses. Most patients had no response to vaccination after 1 dose of the vaccine and 21 patients achieved therapeutic antibody levels after the full dose of vaccination. However, the highest titer of immunoglobulins was found in recipients who received the third dose. The use of vaccinations is safe and can protect the group of patients after pancreas transplantation from serious complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection despite the use of immunosuppressive drugs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Vaccines , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Pancreas , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant Recipients , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines, Synthetic , mRNA Vaccines
4.
Transplant Proc ; 53(4): 1194-1201, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33892930

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients are at high risk of severe complications and death due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: The first part of the article describes a case of COVID-19 in our patient after a recent kidney transplant. The second part of the article presents the outcome of literature search from multiple resources from April 2020 until March 2021. Abstracts were screened, followed by full-text review with data extraction. Part 2 discusses current treatment options of COVID-19, and part 3 refers to this treatment application in patients after solid organ transplant. RESULTS: We have summarized 45 studies from China, France, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Mortality rates from published studies were variable. Based on early data from Spain, 42% of patients who developed COVID-19 within 60 days of transplant died. According to results of the European Renal Association COVID-19 Database collaboration group, the 28-day COVID-19-related mortality is 21.3% for kidney transplant recipients, which is still markedly higher than what is observed in other populations. Acute kidney injury was common, and mycophenolate mofetil and mammalian target of rapamycin were discontinued in most patients. CONCLUSIONS: Effective therapy has been sought since the outbreak of the pandemic, and at the same time intensive work has been done to produce a vaccine that could effectively protect against the disease. Summing up the efforts of numerous groups of researchers from around the world that have been continued since the beginning of 2020, we may assume the following: (1) we still do not have causal drugs that would reduce severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication and allow its complete elimination, but antispike monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 seem to be very promising, and (2) the withdrawal of antiproliferative and antimetabolic drugs and the continuation of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors is now a commonly accepted approach in patients after organ transplant.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Kidney Transplantation , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/virology , Databases, Factual , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Withholding Treatment , COVID-19 Serotherapy
5.
Med Sci Monit ; 26: e920262, 2020 Aug 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32829373

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND The main purpose of diagnostic imaging after pancreas transplantation is to exclude potential complications. As long as standard anatomical imaging such as sonography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are sufficient to display macroscopic vasculature, early changes within the graft caused by insufficient microperfusion will not be displayed for evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with pancreas allograft function in good condition were included in the study. No specific preparation was demanded before the MRI examination. The results of MRI were correlated with Igls criteria. It was a preliminary study to examine diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) value and safety in pancreas transplantation. RESULTS Our results indicated that higher fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the graft's head were associated with delayed graft function and insulin intake. We also compared grafts' images in early and late periods and found differences in T1 signal intensity values. DTI is a reliable noninvasive tool, requiring no contrast agent, to assess graft microstructure in correlation with its function, with FA values showing the most consistent results. By Igls criteria, no graft failure, 76% had optimal function, 10% had good function, and 14% had marginal function. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that DTI can be safely used in patients after pancreas transplantation and is advantageous in detecting early as well as late postoperative complications such as intra-abdominal fluid collection, malperfusion, and ischemia of the graft. Our findings correspond with clinical condition and Igls criteria. DTI is free of ionizing agents and is safe for kidney grafts.


Subject(s)
Allografts/diagnostic imaging , Diffusion Tensor Imaging/adverse effects , Pancreas Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Allografts/blood supply , Anisotropy , C-Peptide/blood , Contrast Media , Delayed Graft Function , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Hypoglycemia , Insulin/blood , Insulin-Secreting Cells/metabolism , Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Male , Prospective Studies , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome
6.
Transplant Proc ; 52(8): 2536-2538, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32307150

ABSTRACT

Pseudoaneurysm is a rare vascular complication in pancreas transplantation that can lead into life-threatening situations. A 44-year-old male patient after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant was admitted to the hospital for routine tests 3 months after surgery. A computed tomography scan and ultrasound examination were done, and a diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm was made. The patient was qualified for endovascular treatment. The pseudoaneurysm was closed using coils, and kidney and pancreas grafts stayed in proper condition. Endovascular interventions in patients after pancreas transplantation are safe and preferable in managing postoperative complications.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm, False/etiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Pancreas Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Transplants/blood supply , Adult , Aneurysm, False/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Humans , Kidney/blood supply , Male , Medical Illustration , Pancreas/blood supply , Postoperative Complications/surgery
7.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 18(1): 8-12, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31724922

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The influence of peritoneal dialysis on outcomes after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant is still vague. In addition, whether peritoneal dialysis leads to a higher risk of infectious complications and higher mortality rates in these transplant patients has not been unambiguously confirmed. In this study, our aim was to verify whether dialysis type determined outcomes on the pancreas graft and whether dialysis type was a risk factor for graftectomy or recipient death. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study group included 44 simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant patients. Analyzed parameters included type and duration of dialysis treatment, age, sex, long-term pancreas graft survival and patient survival, overall mortality, and number of graftectomies. RESULTS: Of 44 patients, 3 (7%) required a graftectomy. Mortality rate of the group was 5%. Of 44 patients, 33 had hemodialysis and 11 had peritoneal dialysis. In those who had hemodialysis, the mean duration of renal replacement therapy was 30.5 months, which was significantly longer than duration for those who had peritoneal dialysis (20.4 mo; P < .01). There were 3 graftectomies and 1 death in the hemodialysis group. In the peritoneal dialysis group, there were no graftectomies and 1 death, with no significant differences in the number of graftectomies and mortality rates between the groups. Long-term survival also did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that type of dialysis did not affect outcomes in our group of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant patients. Before transplant, each patient requires an individual approach to treatment. The type of dialysis performed should not be viewed as a contradiction for transplant.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Pancreas Transplantation , Peritoneal Dialysis , Renal Dialysis , Adult , Clinical Decision-Making , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/diagnosis , Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Male , Pancreas Transplantation/adverse effects , Pancreas Transplantation/mortality , Peritoneal Dialysis/adverse effects , Peritoneal Dialysis/mortality , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Renal Dialysis/mortality , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Ann Transplant ; 24: 199-207, 2019 Apr 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30975974

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Vascular failures are serious complications in pancreas transplantation. Open surgery is a reliable and quick intervention method, but it carries a risk of infection and bleeding. Endovascular procedures are rare among patients after a SPK, but are becoming more frequently used. One of the main risks of the endovascular approach is that the renal function impairment caused by contrast agent. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 200 transplanted pancreases at our center over the last 14 years. The analyses included those patients after pancreas transplantation who required the most challenging vascular interventions and ones that were non-standard for the procedure. RESULTS Severe vascular conditions requiring endovascular intervention were observed in 3% of SPKs. In one retransplanted patient, there was an acute ischemia of the lower extremity due to the narrowing of the common iliac artery following a previous transplantectomy, above the new pancreas graft anastomoses. In another patient, local inflammation led to the disruption of the external iliac artery on the level of transplantectomy, caused severe bleeding, and we had to implement a stent-graft to reconstruct the iliac artery wall. A third patient had a pseudoaneurysm demanding further treatment with a stent-graft implemented into the femoral artery due to a pseudoaneurysm of the right external iliac artery. CONCLUSIONS Intravenous interventions in patients with a transplanted or retransplanted pancreas are safe and feasible. It is a technically demanding procedure, but the risk of kidney graft function deterioration, as well as of bleeding due to the high dose of heparin used, is lower than with open vascular surgery.


Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Pancreas Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Aneurysm, False/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm, False/etiology , Aneurysm, False/surgery , Arteriovenous Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Arteriovenous Fistula/etiology , Arteriovenous Fistula/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Artery/injuries , Femoral Artery/surgery , Humans , Iliac Artery/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Artery/injuries , Iliac Artery/surgery , Intraoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Intraoperative Complications/surgery , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Stents , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
9.
Prz Gastroenterol ; 9(2): 105-8, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25061491

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer is a neoplasm characterised by poor prognosis. The only effective, possible treatment is radical surgery, but most patients do not qualify for surgery because of delayed diagnosis. AIM: To determine if assessment of endocrine pancreatic function could serve as a means of screening for pancreatic cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on a group of 50 patients diagnosed with pancreatic tumour, who were qualified for surgery. RESULTS: From 1.07.2010 to 4.07.2011 a further 50 patients were added to the study group. They had been admitted to the hospital with pancreatic tumours. During the preoperative period, nine of these people had been treated for diabetes, 14 were newly diagnosed with diabetes and 15 had been diagnosed with impaired glucose tolerance, but only 12 had a normal glucose profile. Afterwards, patients underwent the surgical treatment. Histopathological examination revealed that out of the 50 operated patients, 36 suffered from malignant disease, and of these only four had no impaired glucose tolerance before treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In most cases, patients with pancreatic tumours have impaired glucose tolerance. Screening patients over 50 years of age could speed up diagnosis and surgical treatment.

10.
Pol Przegl Chir ; 85(10): 589-97, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24310762

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The improvement of laparoscopic techniques that we witnessed over the last decade, also applied to pancreatic surgery. Both worldwide and in Poland, increasingly more patients with lesions located within the body and tail of the pancreas are treated using laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between January 2009 and March 2013, 107 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy at a single institution: 39 using laparoscopic technique and 68 using open technique. This was a retrospective study. RESULTS: There were no significance differences with regard to duration of the surgical procedure, duration of hospitalization and complication rate between both groups. Statistically significant difference was found for the incidence of spleen preservation in patients undergoing laparoscopy, due to better visualization of the structures. In the group of patients with pancreatic cancer there was no significance difference in the incidence of malignancy found in the surgical margin. Our results are similar to that presented in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a safe method, with a higher rate of spleen preservation among the patients with the lesion located in the body and tail of the pancreas.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/mortality , Laparoscopy/methods , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Pancreatectomy/mortality , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Pancreatectomy/standards , Retrospective Studies , Spleen , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...