Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 68
Filter
1.
Blood Cancer J ; 14(1): 74, 2024 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684670

ABSTRACT

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) precedes multiple myeloma (MM). The risk of progression of SMM patients is not uniform, thus different progression-risk models have been developed, although they are mainly based on clinical parameters. Recently, genomic predictors of progression have been defined for untreated SMM. However, the usefulness of such markers in the context of clinical trials evaluating upfront treatment in high-risk SMM (HR SMM) has not been explored yet, precluding the identification of baseline genomic alterations leading to drug resistance. For this reason, we carried out next-generation sequencing and fluorescent in-situ hybridization studies on 57 HR and ultra-high risk (UHR) SMM patients treated in the phase II GEM-CESAR clinical trial (NCT02415413). DIS3, FAM46C, and FGFR3 mutations, as well as t(4;14) and 1q alterations, were enriched in HR SMM. TRAF3 mutations were specifically associated with UHR SMM but identified cases with improved outcomes. Importantly, novel potential predictors of treatment resistance were identified: NRAS mutations and the co-occurrence of t(4;14) plus FGFR3 mutations were associated with an increased risk of biological progression. In conclusion, we have carried out for the first time a molecular characterization of HR SMM patients treated with an intensive regimen, identifying genomic predictors of poor outcomes in this setting.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Disease Progression , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Mutation , Smoldering Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Male , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Female , Smoldering Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Middle Aged , Aged , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
6.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 55(2): 419-430, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31551517

ABSTRACT

This multicenter phase I trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bortezomib (Bz) as part of both the conditioning regimen and the graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. Patients received fludarabine, melphalan and Bz (days -9 and -2). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of Bz (days +1, +4, and +7), sirolimus (Siro) from day -5 and tacrolimus (Tk) from -3 (except the first five patients that did not receive Tk). Twenty-five patients with poor prognostic multiple myeloma were included. Eleven out of the 19 patients had high-risk features. Out of the 21 patients evaluable at day +100, 14 were in CR (67%) and 7 (33%) in PR. Cumulative incidence (CI) of nonrelapse mortality at 1 year was 24%. CI of grades 2-4 and 3-4 acute GvHD was 35% and 10%, respectively; CI of chronic GvHD was 35% and 55% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Overall and event free survival at 2 years were 64% and 31%, respectively. Bz as part of the conditioning regimen and in the combination with Siro/tacrolimus for GvHD prophylaxis is safe and effective allowing an optimal disease control early after transplant and reducing the risk of GvHD.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Multiple Myeloma , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Tacrolimus , Transplantation Conditioning
7.
Leukemia ; 33(4): 1058-1059, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30842604

ABSTRACT

Following the publication of this article the authors noted that the MRD data under the Table 1 column "Remark" of Aspire should go to that of Pollux. The authors wish to apologize for any inconvenience caused. The corrected table is attached to this correction.

8.
Blood Cancer J ; 8(12): 117, 2018 11 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30455467

ABSTRACT

Here, we investigated for the first time the frequency and number of circulating tumor plasma cells (CTPC) in peripheral blood (PB) of newly diagnosed patients with localized and systemic plasma cell neoplasms (PCN) using next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) and correlated our findings with the distinct diagnostic and prognostic categories of the disease. Overall, 508 samples from 264 newly diagnosed PCN patients, were studied. CTPC were detected in PB of all active multiple myeloma (MM; 100%), and smoldering MM (SMM) patients (100%), and in more than half (59%) monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) cases (p <0.0001); in contrast, CTPC were present in a small fraction of solitary plasmacytoma patients (18%). Higher numbers of CTPC in PB were associated with higher levels of BM infiltration and more adverse prognostic features, together with shorter time to progression from MGUS to MM (p <0.0001) and a shorter survival in MM patients with active disease requiring treatment (p ≤ 0.03). In summary, the presence of CTPC in PB as assessed by NGF at diagnosis, emerges as a hallmark of disseminated PCN, higher numbers of PB CTPC being strongly associated with a malignant disease behavior and a poorer outcome of both MGUS and MM.


Subject(s)
Flow Cytometry , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/metabolism , Plasma Cells/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Flow Cytometry/methods , Humans , Immunophenotyping , Male , Middle Aged , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/metabolism , Multiple Myeloma/metabolism , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/pathology , Plasma Cells/pathology , Prognosis , Sensitivity and Specificity
9.
Leukemia ; 32(2): 252-262, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29257139

ABSTRACT

Despite enormous advances, management of multiple myeloma (MM) remains challenging. Multiple factors impact the decision to treat or which regimen to use at MM relapse/progression. Recent major randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed widely varying progression-free survivals (PFS), ranging from a median of 4 months (MM-003) to 23.6 months (ASPIRE). Based on these RCTs, next-generation proteasome inhibitors (carfilzomib and ixazomib), next-generation immunomodulatory agent (pomalidomide), and monoclonal antibodies (elotuzumab and daratumumab) were approved for relapsed and refractory MM. Daratumumab, targeting CD38, has multiple mechanisms of action including modulation of the immunosuppressive bone marrow micro-environment. In addition to the remarkable single agent activity in refractory MM, daratumumab produced deep responses and superior PFS in MM when combined with lenalidomide/dexamethasone, or bortezomib/dexamethasone. Other anti-CD38 antibodies, such as isatuximab and MOR202, are undergoing assessment. Elotuzumab, targeting SLAMF7, yielded superior response rates and PFS when combined with lenalidomide/dexamethasone. New combinations of these next generation novel agents and/or antibodies are undergoing clinical trials. Venetoclax, an oral BH3 mimetic inhibiting BCL2, showed single agent activity in MM with t(11;14), and is being studied in combination with bortezomib/dexamethasone. Selinexor, an Exportin-1 inhibitor, yielded promising results in quad- or penta-refractory MM including patients resistant to daratumumab. Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD1 check-point inhibitor, is being tested in combination with lenalidomide/dexamethasone or pomalidomide/dexamethasone. Chimeric antigen receptor-T cells targeting B-cell maturation antigen have yielded deep responses in RRMM. Finally, salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an important treatment in MM relapsing/progressing after a first ASCT. Herein, the clinical trial data of these agents are summarized, cautious interpretation of RCTs highlighted, and algorithm for salvage treatment of relapse/refractory MM proposed.


Subject(s)
Antibodies/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Progression-Free Survival , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
10.
Leukemia ; 32(4): 971-978, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29099494

ABSTRACT

Persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) after treatment for myeloma predicts inferior outcomes, but within MRD-positive patients there is great heterogeneity with both early and very late relapses. Among different MRD techniques, flow cytometry provides additional information about antigen expression on tumor cells, which could potentially contribute to stratify MRD-positive patients. We investigated the prognostic value of those antigens required to monitor MRD in 1265 newly diagnosed patients enrolled in the GEM2000, GEM2005MENOS65, GEM2005MAS65 and GEM2010MAS65 protocols. Overall, CD19pos, CD27neg, CD38lo, CD45pos, CD81pos, CD117neg and CD138lo expression predicted inferior outcomes. Through principal component analysis, we found that simultaneous CD38lowCD81posCD117neg expression emerged as the most powerful combination with independent prognostic value for progression-free survival (HR:1.69; P=0.002). This unique phenotypic profile retained prognostic value among MRD-positive patients. We then used next-generation flow to determine antigen stability throughout the course of the disease, and found that the expression of antigens required to monitor MRD is mostly stable from diagnosis to MRD stages, except for CD81 whose expression progressively increased from baseline to chemoresistant tumor cells (14 vs 28%). Altogether, we showed that the phenotypic profile of tumor cells provides additional prognostic information, and could be used to further predict risk of relapse among MRD-positive patients.


Subject(s)
Antigens, CD/metabolism , Multiple Myeloma/metabolism , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/metabolism , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm, Residual/metabolism , Neoplasm, Residual/pathology , Prognosis
11.
Leukemia ; 2017 Dec 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29251284

ABSTRACT

During the last few years, several new drugs have been introduced for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma, which have significantly improved treatment outcome. All of these novel substances differ at least in part in their mode of action from similar drugs of the same drug class, or are representatives of new drugs classes, and as such present with very specific side effect profiles. In this review, we summarize these adverse events, provide information on their prevention, and give practical guidance for monitoring of patients and for management of adverse events.Leukemia accepted article preview online, 18 December 2017. doi:10.1038/leu.2017.353.

12.
Leukemia ; 31(11): 2443-2448, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28620163

ABSTRACT

Introduction of new myeloma therapies offers new options for patients refractory to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs). In this multicenter study, patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, who have received at least three prior lines of therapy, are refractory to both an IMiD (lenalidomide or pomalidomide) and a PI (bortezomib or carfilzomib), and have been exposed to an alkylating agent were identified. The time patients met the above criteria was defined as time zero (T0). Five hundred and forty-three patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2014 were enrolled in this study. Median age at T0 was 62 years (range 31-87); 61% were males. The median duration between diagnosis and T0 was 3.1 years. The median number of lines of therapy before T0 was 4 (range 3-13). The median overall survival (OS) from T0 for the entire cohort was 13 (95% confidence interval (CI) 11, 15) months. At least one regimen recorded after T0 in 462 (85%) patients, with a median (95% CI) progression-free survival and OS from T0 of 5 (4, 6), and 15.2 (13, 17) months, respectively. The study provides the expected outcome of relapsed multiple myeloma that is refractory to a PI and an IMiD, a benchmark for comparison of new therapies being evaluated.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Proteasome Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Prognosis , Recurrence , Survival Analysis
13.
Leukemia ; 31(12): 2630-2641, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28439109

ABSTRACT

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients, but many patients will relapse after ASCT and require subsequent therapy. The proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib is approved for relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). In phase 3 trials, carfilzomib-based regimens (ASPIRE, carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; ENDEAVOR, carfilzomib-dexamethasone) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with standard therapies for RRMM (ASPIRE: lenalidomide-dexamethasone; ENDEAVOR, bortezomib-dexamethasone). This subgroup analysis of ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR evaluated outcomes according to prior ASCT status. In total, 446 patients in ASPIRE and 538 in ENDEAVOR had prior ASCT. Median PFS was longer for carfilzomib-based regimens vs non-carfilzomib-based regimens for patients with prior ASCT (ASPIRE: 26.3 vs 17.8 months (hazard ratio (HR)=0.68); ENDEAVOR: not estimable vs 10.2 months (HR=0.61)), those with one prior line of therapy that included ASCT (ASPIRE: 29.7 vs 17.8 months (HR=0.70); ENDEAVOR: not estimable vs 11.2 months (HR=0.46)), and those without prior ASCT (ASPIRE: 26.4 vs 16.6 months (HR=0.76); ENDEAVOR: 17.7 vs 8.5 months (HR=0.43)). Overall response rates also favored the carfilzomib-based regimens. No new safety signals were detected. This analysis suggests that carfilzomib-based treatment may lead to improvement in PFS and response rates regardless of prior transplant status. Further evaluation is warranted.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Oligopeptides/administration & dosage , Postoperative Care , Recurrence , Retreatment , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome
16.
Leukemia ; 31(10): 2094-2103, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28104919

ABSTRACT

Flow cytometry has become a highly valuable method to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) and evaluate the depth of complete response (CR) in bone marrow (BM) of multiple myeloma (MM) after therapy. However, current flow-MRD has lower sensitivity than molecular methods and lacks standardization. Here we report on a novel next generation flow (NGF) approach for highly sensitive and standardized MRD detection in MM. An optimized 2-tube 8-color antibody panel was constructed in five cycles of design-evaluation-redesign. In addition, a bulk-lysis procedure was established for acquisition of ⩾107 cells/sample, and novel software tools were constructed for automatic plasma cell gating. Multicenter evaluation of 110 follow-up BM from MM patients in very good partial response (VGPR) or CR showed a higher sensitivity for NGF-MRD vs conventional 8-color flow-MRD -MRD-positive rate of 47 vs 34% (P=0.003)-. Thus, 25% of patients classified as MRD-negative by conventional 8-color flow were MRD-positive by NGF, translating into a significantly longer progression-free survival for MRD-negative vs MRD-positive CR patients by NGF (75% progression-free survival not reached vs 7 months; P=0.02). This study establishes EuroFlow-based NGF as a highly sensitive, fully standardized approach for MRD detection in MM which overcomes the major limitations of conventional flow-MRD methods and is ready for implementation in routine diagnostics.


Subject(s)
Flow Cytometry/methods , Immunophenotyping/methods , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Plasma Cells/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibody Specificity , Cell Count , Equipment Design , Female , Flow Cytometry/instrumentation , Humans , Immunophenotyping/instrumentation , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Neoplasm, Residual , Sensitivity and Specificity , Software , Specimen Handling , Treatment Outcome
17.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 52(4): 567-569, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27869809

ABSTRACT

The response evaluation after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is usually performed at day +100 in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A recent report suggests that improvement in the response can be observed beyond day +100. The aim of the present study has been to evaluate the rate of improved response and outcome beyond day +100 after ASCT, with and without maintenance therapy. One hundred and forty-four patients who underwent single ASCT with chemosensitive disease and achieved less than CR at day 100 post ASCT were evaluated. Seventy-four patients (51.4%) did not receive any maintenance with only one of them showing an upgrade in the response. The remaining 70 patients (48.6%) received maintenance therapy; eleven of them (15.7%) improved their response beyond day +100. The outcome of these patients was better than those who did not upgrade their response in both progression-free survival and overall survival (P=0.019 and P=0.031, respectively). In conclusion, the improvement in response beyond day +100 after ASCT in patients not receiving any therapy is exceedingly rare. A minority of patients receiving maintenance therapy after ASCT upgrades their response and this finding is associated with better outcome.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome
18.
Leukemia ; 31(2): 382-392, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27479184

ABSTRACT

The notion that plasma cells (PCs) are terminally differentiated has prevented intensive research in multiple myeloma (MM) about their phenotypic plasticity and differentiation. Here, we demonstrated in healthy individuals (n=20) that the CD19-CD81 expression axis identifies three bone marrow (BM)PC subsets with distinct age-prevalence, proliferation, replication-history, immunoglobulin-production, and phenotype, consistent with progressively increased differentiation from CD19+CD81+ into CD19-CD81+ and CD19-CD81- BMPCs. Afterwards, we demonstrated in 225 newly diagnosed MM patients that, comparing to normal BMPC counterparts, 59% had fully differentiated (CD19-CD81-) clones, 38% intermediate-differentiated (CD19-CD81+) and 3% less-differentiated (CD19+CD81+) clones. The latter patients had dismal outcome, and PC differentiation emerged as an independent prognostic marker for progression-free (HR: 1.7; P=0.005) and overall survival (HR: 2.1; P=0.006). Longitudinal comparison of diagnostic vs minimal-residual-disease samples (n=40) unraveled that in 20% of patients, less-differentiated PCs subclones become enriched after therapy-induced pressure. We also revealed that CD81 expression is epigenetically regulated, that less-differentiated clonal PCs retain high expression of genes related to preceding B-cell stages (for example: PAX5), and show distinct mutation profile vs fully differentiated PC clones within individual patients. Together, we shed new light into PC plasticity and demonstrated that MM patients harbouring less-differentiated PCs have dismal survival, which might be related to higher chemoresistant potential plus different molecular and genomic profiles.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/metabolism , Plasma Cells/metabolism , Plasma Cells/pathology , Adult , Antigens, CD/metabolism , Biomarkers , Bone Marrow/metabolism , Bone Marrow/pathology , Bone Marrow Cells/metabolism , Bone Marrow Cells/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Cell Cycle , DNA Methylation , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Genetic Heterogeneity , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Immunophenotyping , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Mutation , Neoplasm Grading , Phenotype , Prognosis , Single-Cell Analysis , Young Adult
19.
Leukemia ; 30(10): 2026-2031, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27133826

ABSTRACT

The diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) includes patients with a heterogeneous risk of progression to active multiple myeloma (MM): some patients will never progress, whereas others will have a high risk of progression within the first 2 years. Therefore, it is important to improve risk assessment at diagnosis. We conducted a retrospective study in a large cohort of SMM patients, in order to investigate the role of Bence Jones (BJ) proteinuria at diagnosis in the progression to active MM. We found that SMM patients presenting with BJ proteinuria had a significantly shorter median time to progression (TTP) to MM compared with patients without BJ proteinuria (22 vs 88 months, respectively; hazard ratio=2.3, 95% confidence interval=1.4-3.9, P=0.002). We also identified risk subgroups based on the amount of BJ proteinuria: ⩾500 mg/24 h, <500 mg/24 h and without it, with a significantly different median TTP (13, 37 and 88 months, P<0.001). Thus, BJ proteinuria at diagnosis is an independent variable of progression to MM that identifies a subgroup of high-risk SMM patients (51% risk of progression at 2 years) and ⩾500 mg of BJ proteinuria may allow, if validated in another series, to reclassify these patients to MM requiring therapy before the end-organ damage development.


Subject(s)
Bence Jones Protein/urine , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/urine , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/urine , Proteinuria , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Time Factors
20.
Leukemia ; 29(11): 2119-25, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26265183

ABSTRACT

Multiple myeloma (MM) is more recently being recognized as a heterogeneous group of disease with variability in outcomes based on specific clinical and biologic predictors. MM patients can be broadly categorized into standard, intermediate and high risk for disease relapse, morbidity and mortality. The high-risk features include patient-specific factors such as old age, poor performance status and comorbidities; clinical features such as primary plasma cell leukemia and extramedullary disease; disease-specific biologic features such as deletion 17p, t(4;14) and high-risk gene expression profiling signatures. The current paper reviews the available data on best therapeutic approaches for high-risk MM.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Chromosome Aberrations , Gene Expression Profiling , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/etiology , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Multiple Myeloma/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...