ABSTRACT
Over 30 months 9292 consecutive patients admitted to nine coronary care units with suspected myocardial infarction were considered for admission to a randomised double blind study comparing the effect on mortality of nifedipine 10 mg four times a day with that of placebo. Among the 4801 patients excluded from the study the overall one month fatality rate was 18.2% and the one month fatality rate in those with definite myocardial infarction 26.8%. A total of 4491 patients fulfilled the entry criteria and were randomly allocated to nifedipine or placebo immediately after assessment in the coronary care unit. Roughly 64% of patients in both treatment groups sustained an acute myocardial infarction. The overall one month fatality rates were 6.3% in the placebo treated group and 6.7% in the nifedipine treated group. Most of the deaths occurred in patients with an in hospital diagnosis of myocardial infarction, and their one month fatality rates were 9.3% for the placebo group and 10.2% for the nifedipine group. These differences were not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis also did not suggest any particular group of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction who might benefit from early nifedipine treatment in the dose studied.
Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Nifedipine/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Clinical Trials as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Random AllocationSubject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/trends , State Medicine/trends , Absenteeism , Child Health Services , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/economics , Clinical Trials as Topic , Communicable Disease Control/trends , Computers , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Drug Therapy/economics , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Education, Medical/trends , Endoscopy/economics , Female , Health Services for the Aged , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/economics , Medical Audit , Surgical Procedures, Operative/trends , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , United KingdomABSTRACT
To compare the results of home and hospital treatment in men aged under 70 years who had suffered acute myocardial infarction within 48 hours 1895 patients were considered for study in four centres in south-west England. Four-hundred-and-fifty patients were randomly allocated to receive care either at home by their family doctor or in hospital, initially in an intensive care unit. The randomised treatment groups were similar in age, history of cardiovascular disease, and incidence of hypotension when first examined. They were followed up for up to a year after onset. The mortality rate at 28 days was 12% for the random home group and 14% for the random hospital group; the corresponding figures at 330 days were 20% and 27%. On average, older patients and those without initial hypotension fared rather better under home care. The patients who underwent randomisation were similar to those whose place of care was not randomised, except that the non-randomised group contained a higher proportion of initially hypotensive patients, whose prognosis was poor wherever treated. These results confirm and extend our preliminary findings. Home care is a proper form of treatment for many patients with acute myocardial infarction, particularly those over 60 years and those with an uncomplicated attack seen by general practitioners.
Subject(s)
Home Care Services , Hospitalization , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Adult , Aged , Angina Pectoris/therapy , Home Nursing , Humans , Hypotension/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Recurrence , Time FactorsABSTRACT
This is a preliminary report of a co-operative study of 1,203 episodes of acute myocardial infarction in men under 70 years in four centres in the south west of England. The mortality at 28 days was 15%. A comparison is made between home care by the family doctor and hospital treatment initially in an intensive care unit: 343 cases were allocated at random. The randomized groups do not differ significantly in composition with respect to age; past history of angina, infarction, or hypertension; or hypotension when first examined. The mortality rates of the random groups are similar for home and hospital treatment. The group sent electively to hospital contained a higher proportion of initially hypotensive patients whose prognosis was bad wherever treated; those who were not hypotensive fared rather worse in hospital.For some patients with acute myocardial infarction seen by their general practitioner home care is ethically justified, and the need for general admission to hospital should be reconsidered.
