Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nat Biotechnol ; 25(1): 39-43, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17211392

ABSTRACT

The evidence gathered thus far--ultimately to be published in the Draft Risk Assessment on Animal Cloning--indicates that there are no unique risks associated with animal cloning.


Subject(s)
Cloning, Organism , Consumer Product Safety , Food, Genetically Modified , Government Regulation , Organisms, Genetically Modified , Risk Assessment/methods , United States Food and Drug Administration , Animals , Public Opinion , Risk Factors , United States
2.
Theriogenology ; 67(1): 198-206, 2007 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17055042

ABSTRACT

The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Center for Veterinary Medicine issued a voluntary request to producers of livestock clones not to introduce food from clones or their progeny into commerce until the agency had assessed whether production of cattle, swine, sheep, or goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) posed any unique risks to the animal(s) involved in the process, humans, or other animals by consuming food from those animals, compared with any other assisted reproductive technology (ART) currently in use. Following a comprehensive review, no anomalies were observed in animals produced by cloning that have not also been observed in animals produced by other ARTs and natural mating. Further systematic review on the health of, and composition of meat and milk from, cattle, swine, and goat clones and the progeny of cattle and sheep did not result in the identification of any food-consumption hazards. The agency therefore concluded that food from cattle, swine, and goat clones was as safe to eat as food from animals of those species derived by conventional means. The agency also concluded that food from the progeny of the clone of any species normally consumed for food is as safe to eat as those animals. The article also describes the methodology used by the agency to analyze data and draw these conclusions, the plans the agency has proposed to manage any identified risks, and the risk communication approaches the agency has used.


Subject(s)
Animals, Domestic/genetics , Biotechnology/legislation & jurisprudence , Cloning, Organism/veterinary , Consumer Product Safety , United States Food and Drug Administration , Animals , Biotechnology/standards , Cattle/genetics , Goats/genetics , Humans , Risk Assessment , Risk Management , Swine/genetics , United States
3.
Cloning Stem Cells ; 6(2): 79-93, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15268781

ABSTRACT

Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT), or cloning, is likely to be used for the expansion of elite breeding stock of agronomically important livestock used for food. The Center for Veterinary Medicine at the US Food and Drug Administration has been developing a risk assessment to identify hazards and characterize food consumption risks that may result from cloning. The risk assessment is comprised of two prongs. The first evaluates the health of animal clones, and is referred to as the Critical Biological Systems Approach. The second considers the composition of meat and milk from animal clones. Assessing the safety of food products from animal clones and their progeny, at least during these early stages of the development of the technology, is best accomplished by using both approaches: prospectively drawing on our knowledge of biological systems in development and maturation, and in retrograde, from an analysis of food products. Subtle hazards and potential risks that may be posed by animal clones must, however, be considered in the context of other mutations and epigenetic changes that occur in all food animal populations.


Subject(s)
Animals, Genetically Modified , Cloning, Organism/veterinary , Food/adverse effects , Animals , Food/standards , Meat/adverse effects , Meat/standards , Milk/adverse effects , Milk/standards , Mutation , Risk Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL