Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim ; 50(3): 212-218, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35801328

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Although suppression of intraperitoneal gas insufflation response is possible with a higher dose of opioids, sedatives, and inha- lational agents, delayed emergence and poor clinical recovery are still a matter of concern. Here our primary aim was to assess the quality of recovery and the secondary aim includes postinsufflation response, postoperative pain intensity, total opioid requirement, and looking for adverse effects, if any. METHODS: This prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study was conducted among 75 American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I and II patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia. Group 1 received injection tramadol 1 mg kg-1 iv-1 5 minutes after intubation. Similarly, groups 2 and 3 received 0.25 mg kg-1 and 0.5 mg kg-1 injection of ketamine iv, respectively. Intraperitoneal insufflation response was observed from the beginning of insufflation till 15 minutes. Clinical recovery was measured in terms of vigilance, cognition, orientation, and comfort. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed at varying movement activities using numerical rating scale pain score and with the total opioid requirement. The collected data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Groups 1 and 2 had a fair clinical recovery. Postoperative pain intensity was least in group 2, and the postinsufflation mean arterial pressure was higher in groups 1 and 3. A total of 32% of participants had delirium in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical recovery and perioperative analgesia were better in ketamine group (0.25 mg kg-1) without any perturbations in intra- operative pneumoperitoneal response. Hence it can be considered an optimal adjuvant in laparoscopic surgeries.

3.
J Clin Anesth ; 29: 30-2, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26897444

ABSTRACT

Dexmedetomidine is widely used for procedural sedation because of its unique combination of sedation, analgesia, and anxiolysis with minimal respiratory depression. Transient hypertension has been reported during the use of dexmedetomidine which is usually benign and is taken over by the hypotensive response on continuing the infusion. We report a case of hypertensive crisis following dexmedetomidine infusion used for procedural sedation, necessitating discontinuation of the infusion and treatment of hypertension. The dilemmas involved in treating hypertension caused by dexmedetomidine are discussed.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Labetalol/therapeutic use , Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists/adverse effects , Adult , Conscious Sedation/adverse effects , Humans , Male
4.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 11(1): 56-68, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18182765

ABSTRACT

Minimally invasive and non-invasive methods of estimation of cardiac output (CO) were developed to overcome the limitations of invasive nature of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) and direct Fick method used for the measurement of stroke volume (SV). The important minimally invasive techniques available are: oesophageal Doppler monitoring (ODM), the derivative Fick method (using partial carbon dioxide (CO2 ) breathing), transpulmonary thermodilution, lithium indicator dilution, pulse contour and pulse power analysis. Impedance cardiography is probably the only non-invasive technique in true sense. It provides information about haemodynamic status without the risk, cost and skill associated with the other invasive or minimally invasive techniques. It is important to understand what is really being measured and what assumptions and calculations have been incorporated with respect to a monitoring device. Understanding the basic principles of the above techniques as well as their advantages and limitations may be useful. In addition, the clinical validation of new techniques is necessary to convince that these new tools provide reliable measurements. In this review the physics behind the working of ODM, partial CO2 breathing, transpulmonary thermodilution and lithium dilution techniques are dealt with. The physical and the physiological aspects underlying the pulse contour and pulse power analyses, various pulse contour techniques, their development, advantages and limitations are also covered. The principle of thoracic bioimpedance along with computation of CO from changes in thoracic impedance is explained. The purpose of the review is to help us minimize the dogmatic nature of practice favouring one technique or the other.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Output/physiology , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Algorithms , Carbon Dioxide/analysis , Echocardiography, Doppler , Humans , Lithium , Monitoring, Intraoperative/instrumentation , Pulse , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Thermodilution
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...