Quartz Crystal Microbalance as a Predictive Tool for Drug-Material of Construction Interactions in Intravenous Protein Drug Administration.

As a growing number of protein drug products are developed, formulation characterization is becoming important. An IgG drug product is tested at concentrations from 0.0001-0.1 mg/mL for adsorption behavior to polymer surfaces polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polypropylene (PP) upon dilution in normal saline (NS) using quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D). The studies mimicked IgG antibody interaction during IV administration with polymeric surfaces within syringes, lines, and bags. Drug product was characterized with excipients, with focus on surfactant. Drug solutions were run over polymer-coated sensors to measure the adsorption behavior of the formulation with emphasis on the behavior of each of the formulation's components. Over 60 sensorgram data sets were correlated with assayed protein solution concentrations in mock NS-diluted infusions of drug product in the equivalent concentrations to QCM experiments to build a preliminary predictive model for determining fraction of drug and surfactant adsorbed and lost at the hydrophobic surface during administration. These results create a method for reliably and predictively estimating drug product adsorption behavior and protein drug dose loss on polymers at different protein drug concentrations.

An Intercompany Perspective on Compatibility and In-use Stability Studies to Enable Administration Of Biopharmaceutical Drug Products.

In-use stability and compatibility studies are often used in biotherapeutic development to assess stability and compatibility of biologic drugs with diluents and/or administration components at relevant conditions for the target route of administration (commonly intravenous, subcutaneous or intramuscular), to assure that patient safety and product efficacy are maintained during clinical use. To gain an understanding of current industry approaches for in-use stability and compatibility studies, the Formulation Workstream of the BioPhorum Development Group (BPDG), an industry-wide consortium, conducted an inter-company collaboration exercise, which included five bench-marking surveys around in-use stability and compatibility studies of biologic drugs. The results of this industry collaboration provide insights into the practicalities of these studies and how they are being used to support administration of biologics from early clinical programs to marketed products. The surveys queried topics including regulatory strategies and feedback; clinical in-use formulation, patient and site considerations; clinical blinding, masking and placebo approaches; study setup, execution and reporting; and clinical in-use stability and compatibility testing to provide a comprehensive picture of the range of common industry practices. This paper discusses the survey results and presents various approaches which can be used to guide the strategy and design of an in-use stability and compatibility program based on clinical and biomolecule needs.

An Industry Perspective on Compatibility Assessment of Closed System Drug-Transfer Devices for Biologics.

The Formulation Workstream of the BioPhorum Development Group (BPDG), an industry-wide consortium, has identified the increased use of closed system drug-transfer devices (CSTDs) with biologics, without an associated compatibility assessment, to be of significant concern. The use of CSTDs has increased significantly in recent years due to the recommendations by NIOSH and USP that they be used during preparation and administration of hazardous drugs. While CSTDs are valuable in the healthcare setting to reduce occupational exposure to hazardous compounds, these devices may present particular risks that must be adequately assessed prior to use to ensure their compatibility with specific types of drug products, such as biologic drugs, which may be sensitive. The responsibility of ensuring quality of biologic products through preparation and administration to the patient lies with the drug product sponsor. Due to the significant number of marketed CSTD systems, and the large variety of components offered for each system, a strategic, risk-based approach to assessing compatibility is recommended herein. In addition to traditional material compatibility, assessment of CSTD compatibility with biologics should consider additional parameters to address specific CSTD-related risks. The BPDG Formulation Workstream has proposed a systematic risk-based evaluation approach as well as a mitigation strategy for establishing suitability of CSTDs for use.