Retinal Detachment Repair With Vitrectomy: Air Tamponade Integration to a Vitreoretinal Service, Comparison With Gas Tamponade, and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair by pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade (GT) has significant clinical and quality-of-life impacts compared with repair by short-acting air tamponade (AT). With AT, most authors minimize cryotherapy because of prolonged chorioretinal scar formation and use perfluorocarbon to maximize subretinal fluid drainage; this deviates from traditional technique, which discourages popularization of AT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective 12-month study from January to December 2019 of all primary macula-on RRD cases. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria for the Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment Trial received AT and otherwise were assigned to receive GT. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were enrolled: 22 (48%) receiving AT and 24 (52%) receiving GT. The primary success rate of AT was 21 (95%) and the primary success rate of GT was 23 (96%), with 100% final success. Cryopexy was used in 64% of AT cases and 58% of GT cases. Cataract surgery was required less when AT was used (1 [6%]) than when GT was used (3 [21%]). AT was used in 48% of primary macula-on RRD and 27% of all primary RRD cases. CONCLUSIONS: AT has visual and anatomical outcomes comparable to those of GT with conventional vitrectomy techniques, with faster postoperative rehabilitation enabling a swift return to normal daily activities. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53:87-95.].

Vitrectomy with air tamponade and cryotherapy for retinal detachment repair without perfluorocarbon use: A UK 12-month prospective case series.

INTRODUCTION: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is commonly managed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Gas tamponade has significant clinical and quality of life factors that affect the patient. Using shorter acting air tamponade, intuitively leads to surgical concern for higher rate of primary detachment. To circumvent this, surgeons advocate the use of perfluorocarbon to maximise sub-retinal-fluid drainage when using air tamponade and/or avoid using cryotherapy due to longer duration for scar formation relative to laser. These steps are a deviation from traditional technique for otherwise routine primary RRD repair and discourages popularisation of using air tamponade despite the benefits to patients. METHOD: Prospective 12-month, single centre, single surgeon, consecutive study from January to December 2019. Inclusion criteria was as per based on the pneumatic retinopexy versus vitrectomy for retinal detachment: (i) single retinal break or group of breaks, no larger than 1-clock-hour (30°), in detached retina; (ii) all breaks in detached retina lie above the 8 to 4 o'clock meridian; and (iii) breaks or lattice degeneration in attached retina at any location. We excluded PVR formation and RRD in the inferior 4 o'clock hours. RESULTS: We report primary and final success rate of 96% and 100%, respectively in 23 eyes (22 macular-on and one macular-off) with RRD eyes in a 12-month period. Cryopexy was utilised in 65% patients and in isolation in 23% with no perfluorocarbon use in all eyes. CONCLUSION: We show cryotherapy can be used safely in AT-RRD without PFCL in RRD fulfilling PIVOT trial criteria with minimal cataract formation and IOP spikes and faster post-operative visual rehabilitation.

Restructuring emergency eye services during COVID-19 in a tertiary referral centre.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Maintaining emergency eye services is crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article describes the introduction of a new restructured referral pathway to reduce the burden on healthcare providers and create a safe environment. METHODS: During January and February 2020 (group 1), all appointments were face-to-face with a walk-in eye casualty. The first audit cycle comprised all patients in group 1. The primary audit criteria were discharge rates, referral to subspeciality and reattendance. In April 2020, a remodelled system was implemented in which walk-in attendance ceased and was replaced with telephone triage coupled with digital imaging via NHS email for remote clinical review. Patients requiring further assessment following this triage were invited in for face-to-face appointments. A reaudit was conducted during April-July 2020 (group 2) following implementation of these COVID-19 protocol changes. RESULTS: In group 1, 2868 appointments (100.0%) were face-to-face and in group 2 4870 (100.0%) appointments were telephone consults that resulted in 2639 (54.2%) face-to-face appointments. The rate of discharge in the first cycle and second cycle were 55.3% and 76.9% respectively (P<0.0001). Furthermore 2298 (47.2%) patients were able to be discharged following telephone consultation in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Using this telephone and digital imaging review triage system, the authors have demonstrated a significant reduction in the need for face-to-face reviews. The reduction in avoidable patient face-to-face reviews allows the system to move from saturated to sustainable while increasing accessibility to services for patients who may not be able to present for face-to-face review. This complete audit cycle successfully charts interventions that maximise accessibility, reduce unnecessary hospital visits and deliver safe and prompt management during the pandemic.