Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Laryngitis , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Laryngitis/virology , Laryngitis/etiology , Laryngitis/diagnosis , Male , Acute Disease , Female , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring has successfully demonstrated to predict impending damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, by detecting changes in electromyographic recordings. Despite the apparent benefits associated with continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring, its safety is still a debate. The aim of this study was to investigate the electrophysiological impact of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring on the vagus nerve. METHODS: In this prospective study, the amplitude of the electromyographic wave of the vagus nerve-recurrent laryngeal nerve axis was measured both proximally and distally to the stimulation electrode placed upon the vagus nerve. Electromyographic signal amplitudes were collected at three distinct events during the operation: during the dissection of the vagus nerve, before application of the continuous stimulation electrode onto the vagus nerve and after its removal. RESULTS: In total, 169 vagus nerves were analysed, among 108 included patients undergoing continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring-enhanced endocrine neck surgeries. Electrode application resulted in a significant overall decrease in measured proximo-distal amplitudes of -10.94 µV (95 per cent c.i. -17.06 to -4.82 µV) (P < 0.005), corresponding to a mean(s.d.) decrease of -1.4(5.4) per cent. Before the removal of the electrode, the measured proximo-distal difference in amplitudes was -18.58 µV (95 per cent c.i. -28.31 to -8.86 µV) (P < 0.005), corresponding to a mean(s.d.) decrease of -2.50(9.59) per cent. Seven nerves suffered a loss of amplitude greater than 20 per cent of the baseline measurement. CONCLUSION: In addition to supporting claims that continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring exposes the vagus nerve to injury, this study shows a mild electrophysiological impact of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring electrode placement on the vagus nerve-recurrent laryngeal nerve axis. However, the small observed differences are negligible and were not associated with a clinically relevant outcome, making continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring a safe adjunct in selected thyroid surgeries.
Subject(s)
Thyroid Gland , Thyroidectomy , Humans , Prospective Studies , Thyroidectomy/adverse effects , Thyroidectomy/methods , Vagus Nerve/physiology , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve/physiologyABSTRACT
Background: Postoperative hypoparathyroidism remains the most frequent complication of neck endocrine surgery. In order to reduce the incidence of this feared complication, several systems for imaging of near infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF) have been invented to help surgeons identify parathyroid glands (PTGs) and evaluate their vascularization. We evaluated the efficacy of the EleVision IR system in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Methods: We used the EleVision IR system in 25 patients who underwent thyroid/parathyroid surgery or both at our institution between December 2020 and July 2021. At various stages of the surgery, the surgeon first looked for PTGs with the naked eye and then completed the visual inspection with NIRAF imaging. We then compared both the naked eye and NIRAF-supported PTGs detection rates. At the end of surgery, we performed indocyanine green angiography of PTGs in 17 patients. Results: In total, we identified 80% of PTGs: 65% with the naked eye only and additional 15% with the assistance of the EleVision IR system. 14 of 17 patients evaluated by ICG angiography had at least one well-vascularized PTG. Only one of these patients (a case of subtotal parathyroidectomy for tertiary hyperparathyroidism) developed symptomatic postoperative hypocalcemia despite a normal parathormone level. The three other patients had at least one remaining moderately-vascularized PTG and only one patient developed transient postoperative hypoparathyroidism. Conclusion: We concluded that EleVision IR provides an efficient support for identification and evaluation of PTGs, and may be of great assistance in endocrine surgery. The images are easy to interpret even for less experienced surgeons thanks to the different types of color visualization and the possibility to measure the relative fluorescence intensity of PTGs and surrounding tissues.
