ABSTRACT
Besides the undeniable need to respect parental autonomy, providing information is a legal and moral obligation, to be informed a basic right. The act of informing should be considered as an exchange and necessarily begins by listening to the other. According to the jurisprudence of the Court of Cassation that draws on Article 35 of the Deontological Code, information has to be clear (implying an educational effort, availability and to check that the information has been well understood), appropriate (adapted to each situation and person) and honest (which supposes a moral contract between parents and physicians). Loyalty implies a consideration of the uncertainty underlying medical practice, and of the limitations in arriving at a prognosis. Indeed, caution needs to be exercised in conveying information, taking into account the risk of its becoming self-fulfilling, which could modify the way in which parents take care of their child. The information given has to be coherent, both within the spatial dimension (coherence of information between the different maternity services in the perinatal network) and the temporal dimension (coherence of information between pre- and postnatal stages). It must be acknowledged that information is essentially subjective. There is a fundamental difference between coherence and uniformity, and as regards information, uniformity is neither possible nor desirable. In each situation, priority must be given to oral information delivered in an appropriate material context. The principle of establishing, in the medical file, a written trace of the information given at various stages is one way to guarantee its coherence.
