Sciatic nerve fascicle differentiation on high-resolution ultrasound with histological verification: An ex vivo study.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The development of high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) has enabled the depiction of peripheral nerve microanatomy in vivo. This study compared HRUS fascicle differentiation to the structural depiction in histological cross-sections (HCS). METHODS: A human cadaveric sciatic nerve was marked with 10 surgical sutures, and HRUS image acquisition was performed with a 22-MHz probe. The nerve was excised and cut into five segments for HCS preparation. Selected HCS were cross-referenced to HRUS, with sutures to improve orientation. Sciatic nerve and fascicle contouring were performed to assess nerve and fascicular cross-sectional area (CSA), fascicle count, and interfascicular distances. Three groups were defined based on HRUS fascicle differentiation in comparison to HCS, namely single fascicle (SF), fascicular cluster (FC), and no depiction (ND) group. RESULTS: On cross-referenced HRUS to HCS images, 58% of fascicles were differentiated. On HRUS, significantly larger fascicle CSA and smaller fascicle count were observed compared with HCS. Group analysis showed that 41% of fascicles were defined as SF, 47% as FC, and 12% as ND. The mean fascicle CSA in the ND group was 0.05 mm2. Compared with the SF, the FC had significantly larger fascicle CSA (1.2 ± 0.7 vs. 0.6 ± 0.4 mm2; p < .001) and shorter interfascicular distances (0.1 ± 0.04 vs. 0.5 ± 0.3 µm; p < .001). DISCUSSION: While HRUS can depict fascicular anatomy, only half of the fascicles visualized on HRUS directly correspond to single fascicles observed on HCS. The amount of interfascicular epineurium appears to influence the ability of HRUS to differentiate individual fascicles.

Median and ulnar nerve fascicle imaging using MR microscopy and high-resolution ultrasound.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Understanding nerve microanatomy is important as different neuropathies and some nerve neoplasms present with fascicle enlargement. The aim of our study was to gain clinically oriented knowledge on nerve fascicular anatomy using imaging modalities. METHODS: On a cadaveric upper extremity, high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) scan with 22 MHz probe was performed. Sections of the median and ulnar nerves were excised at the level of the distal arm and after magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM), histological cross-sections (HCS) were prepared. Cross-referencing of the MRM and HRUS images with HCS was performed. Fascicle and nerve contouring was performed with morphometric software in order to assess nerve and fascicular cross-sectional area (CSA), fascicle count, and interfascicular distances. Based on fascicle differentiation, factual fascicle (FF) group and fascicular cluster (FC) group were defined. RESULTS: On the cross-referenced imaging material, fascicles were differentiated in 92.7% on MRM and in 57.3% on HRUS. High to very high positive correlation among imaging material was observed for the fascicle CSA. FF depiction was 30.1% on HRUS. In comparison to the FF group, the FC group had significantly larger fascicle CSA and shorter interfascicular distances. DISCUSSION: The findings of our study contribute to understanding of fascicle depiction on imaging modalities. HRUS offers good visualization of fascicles. The capability of differentiating fascicles is modality specific and depends on the fascicle CSA and the amount of interfascicular epineurium.

Ultrasound-guided injections in pelvic entrapment neuropathies.

Pelvic entrapment neuropathies represent a group of chronic pain syndromes that significantly impede the quality of life. Peripheral nerve entrapment occurs at specific anatomic locations. There are several causes of pelvic entrapment neuropathies, such as intrinsic nerve abnormality or inflammation with scarring of surrounding tissues, and surgical interventions in the abdomen, pelvis and the lower limbs. Entrapment neuropathies in the pelvic region are not widely recognized, and still tend to be underdiagnosed due to numerous differential diagnoses with overlapping symptoms. However, it is important that entrapment neuropathies are correctly diagnosed, as they can be successfully treated. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, ischiadic nerve, genitofemoral nerve, pudendal nerve, ilioinguinal nerve and obturator nerve are the nerves most frequently causing entrapment neuropathies in the pelvic region. Understanding the anatomy as well as nerve motor and sensory functions is essential in recognizing and locating nerve entrapment. The cornerstone of the diagnostic work-up is careful physical examination. Different imaging modalities play an important role in the diagnostic process. Ultrasound is a key modality in the diagnostic work-up of pelvic entraptment neuropathies, and its use has become increasingly widespread in therapeutic procedures. In the article, the authors describe the background of pelvic entrapment neuropathies with special focus on ultrasound-guided injections.