ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The value of alternative autogenous venous conduits for treating critical limb ischaemia (CLI) with infragenicular bypass surgery is well established. In this study, the results of using arm veins as alternative conduits for treating CLI over a 15-year period have been evaluated. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Between 1991 and 2005. 120 infragenicular bypasses using arm vein conduits (AVCs) were performed in 120 patients. CLI was the main indication (87.5%) for the procedures. The indications for using arm veins were inadequacy or absence of the ipsilateral greater saphenous vein (GSV). Survival, limb salvage, and patency rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: There was a predominance of male gender (65%), and the group mean age was 68.1 ± 8.3 years. The mean follow-up period was 29.6 ± 26.3 months. The operative mortality (30 days) rate was 7.5%. The main alternative conduit was non-spliced cephalic vein (37.5%). Composite grafts included GSV + AVC (45.2%), AVC + AVC (43.3%) and small saphenous vein + AVC (11.5%). The 5-year primary and secondary patency (SP) rates were 45.2 ± 5.6% and 56.5 ± 5.0%, respectively. The 5-year SP rate was greatest when using non-spliced cephalic vein (65.8 ± 7.6%), but there was no difference in cumulative patency between spliced and non-spliced veins (49.5 ± 8.0% vs. 61.2 ± 6.4%; p = 0.501). The 5-year limb salvage and survival rates were 70.6 ± 5.9% and 59.6 ± 5.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The favourable long term results of secondary patency and limb salvage rates encourage the use of arm veins as alternative conduits for infragenicular bypass surgery.
Subject(s)
Ischemia/surgery , Upper Extremity/blood supply , Vascular Grafting/methods , Aged , Critical Illness , Female , Humans , Ischemia/diagnosis , Ischemia/mortality , Ischemia/physiopathology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Limb Salvage , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Grafting/adverse effects , Vascular Grafting/mortality , Vascular Patency , Veins/physiopathology , Veins/transplantationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report our experience of long-term results of inframalleolar bypass. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed 122 inframalleolar bypasses performed between January 1991 and June 2005 in 116 patients. Most patients were treated for critical ischaemia (97%). The indication for the use of podalic arteries was a lack of tibial arteries with run-off to the foot. The dorsalis pedis was predominantly used for distal anastomoses (62.3%) and the greater saphenous vein (84.4%) as the conduit. The follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 60 months. The endpoints analysed were graft patency, limb salvage, preservation of deambulation and survival rate. RESULTS: The cumulative patency was 58.2% at 3 years and 53.4% at 5 years. The best results were achieved with the devalvulated greater saphenous veins. Limb salvage was 70.0% at 3 years and 50.4% at 5 years, with preserved deambulation rates of 57.3% and 47.1%, respectively. There were 36 major and 45 minor amputations. At 3 years, the survival rate was 50.2% and the surgical mortality 13%. Female sex was associated with worse results for cumulative patency and limb salvage (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the long term, inframalleolar bypass is a satisfactory option for limb salvage.
