Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 2024 Jun 26.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38987114

ABSTRACT

Alveolar-pleural fistulas (APF) are a clinical entity that represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work is to design a diagnostic algorithm for the anatomical detection of APF in patients who are not candidates for surgical treatment. METHOD: Prospective non-randomized study of 47 patients. Diagnostic procedures were performed: (a) prior to bronchoscopy: computed axial tomography (CT) and implantation of electronic pleural drainage system (EPD) and (b) endoscopic: endobronchial occlusion (EO) by balloon, selective endobronchial oxygen insufflation (OI) (2l) and selective bronchography (BS) (instillation of iodinated radiological contrast using continuous fluoroscopy). RESULTS: The sample was predominantly male (81%). The diagnostic methods revealed: (a) Determination of the anatomical location of APF by CT in 15/46 patients (31.9% of sample), and variations in the pattern (intermittent or continuous air leak) and quantification after drug administration sedatives using EPD, (b) endoscopic: anatomical determination of APF was achieved in 57.1, 81 and 63.4% respectively using EO, OI and BS. The combination of the diagnostic tests allowed us to determine the anatomical location of the APF in 91.5% of the sample. No complications were recorded in 85.1% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of APF by flexible bronchoscopy is a useful method, with an adequate safety and efficacy profile. The proposed diagnostic algorithm includes the use of EPD and performing a CT scan. Regarding endoscopic diagnosis: in case of continuous air leak, the first option is OE; and if the leak is intermittent, we recommend endobronchial OI, with BS as a secondary option (respective sensitivity 81% vs 63.4% and complications 8.1% vs 7.3%).

2.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 59(11): 743-749, nov. 2023. ilus, tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-227424

ABSTRACT

Objective: The optimal surgical approach for second primary metachronous lung cancer (MPLC) remains unclear. Our aim is to evaluate the morbidity and prognostic value based on the extent of surgical resection in MPLC. Methods: Retrospective study of 84 patients with a history of anatomical resection for lung cancer and MPLC surgically treated between January 2010 and December 2020. Results: The interval between the initial primary tumor and the second was 50.38±32.89 months. The second resection was contralateral in 43 patients (51.2%) and ipsilateral in 41 (48.8%). Thirty-six patients (42.9%) underwent a second anatomical resection, and in 48 patients (57.1%), it was non-anatomical. Postoperative complications were observed in 29 patients (34.5%) after the second lung resection. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 95.2% were mild (Clavien-Dindo I–II), and a single patient died (1.2%) in the postoperative period (Grade V). Prolonged air leak (p=0.037), postoperative arrhythmias (p=0.019) and hospital stay showed significant differences depending on the extent of surgery in ipsilateral resections. The main histological type was adenocarcinoma (47.6%) and the median tumor size was 17.74±11.74mm. The overall survival was 58.07 months (95% CI 49.29–66.85) for patients undergoing anatomical resection and 50.97 months (95% CI 43.31–58.63) for non-anatomical without significant differences (p=0.144). The disease-free survival after the second surgery was 53.75 months (95% CI 45.28–62.23) for anatomical resection and 41.34 months (95% CI 33.04–49.65) for non-anatomical group. Conclusion: Second anatomical resections provide good long-term outcomes and have been shown to provide better disease-free survival compared to non-anatomical resections in properly selected patients. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/surgery , Pneumonectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
4.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 59(11): 743-749, 2023 Nov.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37612175

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The optimal surgical approach for second primary metachronous lung cancer (MPLC) remains unclear. Our aim is to evaluate the morbidity and prognostic value based on the extent of surgical resection in MPLC. METHODS: Retrospective study of 84 patients with a history of anatomical resection for lung cancer and MPLC surgically treated between January 2010 and December 2020. RESULTS: The interval between the initial primary tumor and the second was 50.38±32.89 months. The second resection was contralateral in 43 patients (51.2%) and ipsilateral in 41 (48.8%). Thirty-six patients (42.9%) underwent a second anatomical resection, and in 48 patients (57.1%), it was non-anatomical. Postoperative complications were observed in 29 patients (34.5%) after the second lung resection. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 95.2% were mild (Clavien-Dindo I-II), and a single patient died (1.2%) in the postoperative period (Grade V). Prolonged air leak (p=0.037), postoperative arrhythmias (p=0.019) and hospital stay showed significant differences depending on the extent of surgery in ipsilateral resections. The main histological type was adenocarcinoma (47.6%) and the median tumor size was 17.74±11.74mm. The overall survival was 58.07 months (95% CI 49.29-66.85) for patients undergoing anatomical resection and 50.97 months (95% CI 43.31-58.63) for non-anatomical without significant differences (p=0.144). The disease-free survival after the second surgery was 53.75 months (95% CI 45.28-62.23) for anatomical resection and 41.34 months (95% CI 33.04-49.65) for non-anatomical group. CONCLUSION: Second anatomical resections provide good long-term outcomes and have been shown to provide better disease-free survival compared to non-anatomical resections in properly selected patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Pneumonectomy/adverse effects , Neoplasms, Second Primary/surgery
8.
World J Clin Oncol ; 13(5): 314-322, 2022 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35662985

ABSTRACT

The aim of neoadjuvant treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is to eliminate micrometastatic disease to facilitate surgical resection. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) in localised NSCLC has numerous advantages over other therapeutic modalities and is considered standard treatment in resectable disease. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improves long-term survival in advanced disease and has a better toxicity profile than conventional therapies. These immunotherapy agents (anti-PD1/PD-L1), administered with or without ChT, are currently being evaluated in the preoperative setting, with initial results showing better pathological response rates and more long-term benefits. Importantly, these drugs do not appear to increase the rate of severe adverse effects and/or postoperative complications. However, several questions still need to be resolved, including the identification of predictive biomarkers; comparative studies of immunotherapy alone vs combined treatment with ChT and/or radiotherapy; the optimal duration of treatment; the timing of surgery; the need for adjuvant treatment; appropriate radiologic evaluation and mediastinal staging; and the correlation between pathological response and survival outcomes. Here we review the current evidence for immunotherapy from a multidisciplinary perspective and discuss current and future controversies.

11.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 32(6): 904-910, 2021 05 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33580683

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Atypical carcinoids are neuroendocrine neoplasms of intermediate degree and low frequency. The aim of this study is to analyse their clinical characteristics and the importance of different histopathological factors in their prognosis. METHODS: Multicentre cooperative group EMETNE prospectively reviewed 153 patients operated on between 1998 and 2016 with diagnosis of atypical carcinoids. Clinical variables and histopathological features were assessed. RESULTS: Mean age was 54.36 years, similar for both genders. Concerning pathological study, mean tumour size was 31.7 mm. Rosettes were presented in 17% of the cases and tumoural necrosis in 23.3%. The cell proliferation factor Ki-67 index was 10.7%. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 95.8% and 88.9%, respectively. In the univariate study, statistically significant differences in survival were found for each of the categories of T, N and M factors. Mitotic index and quantification of expression of Ki-67 showed influence in overall survival, although without statistical significance. In the multivariate analysis, factors N, M and mitotic index behaved as independent prognostic factors related to survival. Median disease-free interval in the series was 163.35 months. In cases with loco-regional recurrence, 53% had positive hiliar or mediastinal nodal involvement at the time of the surgery. In the univariate analysis, we observed statistically significant differences in disease-free interval in patients with nodal involvement (P = 0.024) and non-anatomical resections (P = 0.04). Histological characteristics showed no statistically significant differences in disease-free interval. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node involvement, the development of distant metastasis and mitotic index, more than Ki-67 determination, were shown as independent prognostic factors related to survival of these patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoid Tumor , Carcinoid Tumor/surgery , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
16.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 53(10): 568-573, oct. 2017. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-167424

ABSTRACT

El cáncer de pulmón (CP) constituye un problema de salud pública de primer orden. A pesar de los recientes avances en su tratamiento, la prevención primaria y el diagnóstico precoz son las claves para reducir su incidencia y mortalidad. Un ensayo clínico reciente demostró la eficacia del cribado selectivo con tomografía computarizada de baja dosis (TCBD) en la reducción del riesgo de muerte en personas de alto riesgo, tanto por CP como global. Este artículo recoge las reflexiones de un grupo de expertos designados por la Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR), la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Torácica (SECT), la Sociedad Española de Radiología Médica (SERAM) y la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM) sobre el uso de la TCBD para el diagnóstico precoz del CP en personas con riesgo elevado de padecerlo y los pasos necesarios para evaluar su implementación en nuestro país


Lung cancer (LC) is a major public health issue. Despite recent advances in treatment, primary prevention and early diagnosis are key to reducing the incidence and mortality of this disease. A recent clinical trial demonstrated the efficacy of selective screening by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in reducing the risk of both lung cancer mortality and all-cause mortality in high-risk individuals. This article contains the reflections of an expert group on the use of LDCT for early diagnosis of LC in high-risk individuals, and how to evaluate its implementation in Spain. The expert group was set up by the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR), the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT), the Spanish Society of Radiology (SERAM) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM)


Subject(s)
Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Smoking/adverse effects , Tobacco Use Cessation/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis
17.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 53(10): 568-573, 2017 Oct.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28416207

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer (LC) is a major public health issue. Despite recent advances in treatment, primary prevention and early diagnosis are key to reducing the incidence and mortality of this disease. A recent clinical trial demonstrated the efficacy of selective screening by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in reducing the risk of both lung cancer mortality and all-cause mortality in high-risk individuals. This article contains the reflections of an expert group on the use of LDCT for early diagnosis of LC in high-risk individuals, and how to evaluate its implementation in Spain. The expert group was set up by the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR), the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT), the Spanish Society of Radiology (SERAM) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM).


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mass Screening/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Mass Screening/economics , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Predictive Value of Tests , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk , Sensitivity and Specificity , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Spain/epidemiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...