Writing Effective Insurance Justification Letters for Cancer Genetic Testing: A Streamlined Approach.

The topic of insurance coverage and justification letters for cancer predisposition testing has been the subject of much discussion on the National Society of Genetic Counselors Cancer Special Interest Group (NSGC Cancer-SIG) listserv. Some counselors have stated that they have had difficulty in obtaining insurance coverage for their patients, while others have indicated that they would appreciate seeing examples of successful letters. The purpose of this paper is to provide practical guidance in writing successful letters of justification and to share insurance success stories in the area of cancer genetic testing.

The breast surgeon's role in BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing.

Five percent to 10% of all women who develop breast cancer carry a hereditary mutation in the genes BRCA1 or BRCA2. Genetic testing is now clinically available, and the results of such testing can dramatically alter a patient's risks for an ipsilateral or contralateral primary breast cancer and ovarian cancer. Therefore, genetic testing will become integral in tailoring surveillance, chemoprevention, and surgical management plans for patients at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes. Such results will also impact the cancer risks for the patient's nuclear and extended family members. Surgeons will play a pivotal role in eliciting personal and family histories from patients, determining which of those histories is suggestive of a germline mutation, facilitating referrals for genetic counseling and testing, and incorporating the results of genetic testing into the patient's short- and long-term management plans.

What would you do? Specialists' perspectives on cancer genetic testing, prophylactic surgery, and insurance discrimination.

PURPOSE: To examine what cancer genetics specialists predict they would do personally if they were at 50% risk of carrying a mutation that predisposes to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (BRCA1/BRCA2) and hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). METHODS: Questionnaire survey of the membership of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) Special Interest Group (SIG) in Cancer. RESULTS: Of the 296 active members of the NSGC Cancer-SIG surveyed, 163 (55%) responded. Eighty-five percent predicted that if they had a 50% risk of carrying a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation, they would pursue genetic testing. If they tested positive for a mutation at age 35, 25% predicted they would pursue prophylactic bilateral mastectomies and 68%, prophylactic oophorectomy. Ninety-one percent of respondents believe they would pursue genetic testing for HNPCC, and 17% would elect prophylactic colectomy; 54%, prophylactic hysterectomy; and 52%, prophylactic oophorectomy if they tested positive for a mutation. The majority (68%) would not bill their insurance companies for genetic testing because of fear of discrimination, and 26% would use an alias when undergoing testing. Fifty-seven percent of counselors would seek professional psychologic support to help them cope with the results of testing. CONCLUSION: A large percentage of cancer genetic counseling providers predicted they would opt for prophylactic surgery at a young age if they carried a BRCA or HNPCC mutation, and most would seek professional psychologic assistance when undergoing testing. More than half of respondents would not bill their insurance companies for genetic testing, largely because of fear of genetic discrimination. The vast majority of those providers most familiar with cancer genetic testing and its associated medical, psychologic, and legal implications would still pursue genetic testing.

Local recurrence in the conservatively treated breast cancer patient: a correlation with age and family history.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships among young age at diagnosis, family history status, and local recurrence in breast cancer patients treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy. METHODS: Between January 1970 and December 1990, 984 early-stage breast cancer patients were treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy at Yale-New Haven Hospital. All patient data, including demographics, staging information, treatment, and outcome variables were entered into a computerized database. The current study focused on the relationships between young age, family history, and local relapse. A group of 52 patients who experienced a local recurrence in the conservatively treated breast and 52 matched control patients who had not experienced a local recurrence were asked to participate in a study to determine whether local recurrence was associated with family history. Detailed family history interviews were conducted, and pedigrees were analyzed by a genetic counselor who was blind to the clinical history of the patients. RESULTS: As of September 1997, with a median follow-up of 12.3 years for the 984 patients in the database, the overall actuarial 10-year survival is 73%, and the 10-year distant metastasis-free survival is 78%. Of the 984 patients, 112 have experienced a local relapse in the conservatively treated breast, resulting in a 10-year actuarial breast relapse rate of 15%. The 10-year survival after breast relapse is 69%. Patient age tested as a continuous variable correlated strongly with ipsilateral breast tumor relapse. Using age 40 as a cutpoint, patients aged 40 years or less had a significantly higher local relapse rate than patients older than 40 years (P < 0.001). Although the relationship between local relapse and young age was strong, no association was found between family history and local relapse in the detailed family history study. CONCLUSIONS: Young age at diagnosis was a significant prognostic factor for local relapse. In a detailed family history study using a case-control design, no significant differences in family history status were found between patients who had experienced a local relapse and patients who had not.

The impact of genetic screening on surgical decision-making in breast cancer.

For centuries, clinicians have recognized that a segment of their patient population is at increased risk to develop breast cancer based on their family history of the disease. Due to the absence of molecular information, it was not uncommon for women and their surgeons to make decisions regarding management of prophylactic surgery based solely on their family history, without specific information about the patient's personal risk to develop the disease. It has been only within the past 7 years that linkage for the breast cancer (BRCA) susceptibility genes has been established, and within the past 3 years that the genes have been cloned. Although clinical testing for the BRCA genes has been available for less than 2 years, it is already apparent that the implications for surgeons and their patients are significant.

Generations Lost: A Cancer Genetics Case Report.

The process of cancer genetic counseling can unearth issues that, sometimes unbeknownst to the counselor, are emotionally and psychologically significant to the patient. The following case report illustrates how the precounseling process of obtaining a medical chart on a deceased parent affected two sister counselees. This medical chart helped these sisters to reconnect with the mother they lost as children and to better understand her struggle with breast cancer. This case also chronicles the counselor's professional growth and discovery during this process.

Framework for a proactive parent support group: the Syracuse cystic fibrosis model.

Many support groups are organized and run according to goals and by-laws set by facilitators. This article introduces a model in which all goals and by-laws are created by the parents based on their group's specific needs. It also describes a "proactive" approach in which the group members identify projects or problems in their community and collectively form a plan in an attempt to improve these situations. This model is based on the real-life experience of a cystic fibrosis parent support group in Syracuse, New York. Lessons learned from this model can be applied to other parent support groups.

Practice variability in prenatal genetic counseling.

This study demonstrated that the content of prenatal genetic counseling sessions varied from counselor to counselor and from center to center. The study was designed to examine which specific issues were included by genetic counselors in prenatal genetic counseling sessions, and to determine which factors led genetic counselors to include or exclude this information from such sessions. Data were collected by randomly surveying 200 full, master degree members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC). Respondents provided information by deciding which of 45 specific issues they would include in a standard prenatal genetic counseling session, and which one factor from a bank of 11 factors most accurately described the reason for this decision. The results indicated that the issues included/excluded from sessions varied widely among genetic counselors. The results also indicated that Patient Education/Informed Decision Making (34.5%) played the largest role in decision making overall, with Standard at Center/Departmental Policy (17.6%), Personal Experience/Preference (12.4%), and Applicability (10.9%) serving as the next three most important reasons for including or excluding issues from prenatal genetic counseling sessions.