Postoperative radiotherapy after upfront radical prostatectomy: debated issues at a turning point-a survey exploring management trends on behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology)

Objectives Postoperative prostate cancer patients are a heterogeneous population, and many prognostic factors (e.g., local staging, PSA kinetics, margin status, histopathological features) may influence their clinical management. In this complex scenario, univocal recommendations are often lacking. For these reasons, the present survey was developed by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) to collect the opinion of Italian radiation oncologists and delineate a representation of current clinical practice in our country. Methods A questionnaire was administered online to AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) members registered in 2020 with a clinical interest in uro-oncological disease. Results Sixty-one per cent of AIRO members answered the proposed survey. Explored topics included career and expertise, indications to adjuvant RT, additional imaging in biochemical recurrence setting, use of salvage radiotherapy (SRT), management of clinically evident locoregional recurrence and future considerations. Conclusions Overall, good level of agreement was found between participants for most of the topics. Most debated issues regarded, as expected, implementation of new imaging methods in this setting. Notably, trend in favour of early SRT vs. immediate adjuvant RT was underlined, and preference for global evaluation rather than isolated risk factors for RT indications was noticed (AU)

Postoperative radiotherapy after upfront radical prostatectomy: debated issues at a turning point-a survey exploring management trends on behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology).

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative prostate cancer patients are a heterogeneous population, and many prognostic factors (e.g., local staging, PSA kinetics, margin status, histopathological features) may influence their clinical management. In this complex scenario, univocal recommendations are often lacking. For these reasons, the present survey was developed by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) to collect the opinion of Italian radiation oncologists and delineate a representation of current clinical practice in our country. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered online to AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) members registered in 2020 with a clinical interest in uro-oncological disease. RESULTS: Sixty-one per cent of AIRO members answered the proposed survey. Explored topics included career and expertise, indications to adjuvant RT, additional imaging in biochemical recurrence setting, use of salvage radiotherapy (SRT), management of clinically evident locoregional recurrence and future considerations. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, good level of agreement was found between participants for most of the topics. Most debated issues regarded, as expected, implementation of new imaging methods in this setting. Notably, trend in favour of early SRT vs. immediate adjuvant RT was underlined, and preference for global evaluation rather than isolated risk factors for RT indications was noticed.

The German Hodgkin Study Group risk model is useful for Hodgkin lymphoma patients receiving radiotherapy after autologous stem cell transplant.

PURPOSE: To apply the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) risk model in patients with recurrent/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma receiving involved-field radiotherapy after autologous stem cell transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study consisted in the retrospective analysis of 30 consecutive patients with recurrent/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma who received involved-field radiotherapy after autologous stem cell transplantation. Our policy was of adding involved-field radiotherapy for patients with positive PET scan before autologous stem cell transplantation (23 out of 30 patients, 77%), and/or irradiating sites of bulky disease at relapse (11 out of 30 patients, 37%). Patients were stratified into four risk groups according to the presence of the five clinical risk factors identified by the GHSG; (1) stage IV disease; (2) time to relapse≤3 months; (3) ECOG-PS≥1; (4) bulk≥5cm; and (5) inadequate response to salvage chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median interval from autologous stem cell transplantation to involved-field radiotherapy was 3 months (range, 1-7 months), and the median involved-field radiotherapy dose was 35Gy (range, 12-40Gy). At a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 1-132 months), the 2-year progression-free survival in the entire series was 60%. When examining the four different GHSG risk groups, the progression-free survival rate at 2 years was 86%, 83%, 50%, and 36% for patients with score=0, score=1, score=2, and score=3 to 5, respectively (P=0,01). Among the 12 patients havingat leastthree risk factors who underwent thoracic involved-field radiotherapy, three (25%) developed pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: The adoption of the GHSG risk model at the time of recurrence/progression is a useful prognostic tool to select patients with Hodgkin lymphoma for consolidative involved-field radiotherapy after autologous stem cell transplantation.