ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to investigate the stress distribution generated in a veneer restoration of an upper central incisor compared to intact teeth using the finite element analysis after applying a lingual buccal loading at the incisal edge. METHODS: Two models were developed: one model contained enamel, dentine, cementum, periodontal ligament, cortical and trabecullar bones, and the other model was a veneer restoration; both models were developed using MSC/Nastran software (MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA) as the pre- and post-processor. A 10-N load was applied at the incisal edge from the lingual to the buccal side to simulate oral conditions in this area (protrusion). RESULTS: Von Mises stresses were then analysed for three different regions: A-B (enamel elements under the veneer or second enamel layer), A'-B' (buccal enamel and/or veneer element layer) and C-D (lingual enamel elements layer). A higher stress mode was observed for both models at the lingual cervical region. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a veneer restoration on the incisors is a good alternative to mimic the behaviour of enamel under protrusion loading conditions. The use of veneers to replace enamel during rehabilitations is recommended.
Subject(s)
Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis/methods , Dental Veneers , Incisor/physiology , Models, Biological , Bite Force , Computer Simulation , Finite Element Analysis , Humans , Incisor/surgery , Stress, MechanicalABSTRACT
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate marginal leakage in class V restorations in primary teeth restored with amalgam, using three different techniques. Thirty maxillary anterior primary teeth, clinically sound and naturally exfoliated, were used. In group 1 (n = 10), two thin layers of a copal varnish (Cavitine) were applied. In group 2 (n = 10), Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus, a dual adhesive system, was used according to manufacturer instructions. In group 3 (n = 10), One-Step adhesive system in combination with a low-viscosity resin (Resinomer) were used according to manufacturer instructions. All samples were restored with a high-copper dental amalgam alloy (GS 80, SDI). After restoration, the samples were stored in normal saline at 37 degrees C for 72 h. The specimens were polished, thermocycled (500 cycles, 5 degrees and 55 degrees C, 30-s dwell time) and impermeabilized with fingernail polish to within 1.0 mm of the restoration margins. The teeth were then placed in 0.5% methylene blue for 4 h. Finally, the samples were sectioned and evaluated for marginal leakage. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the filled adhesive resin (group 3) had the least microleakage. There was no significant difference between groups 1 and 2.
Subject(s)
Dental Amalgam , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Leakage/prevention & control , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Tooth, Deciduous , Composite Resins , Dental Cavity Lining , Dental Materials , Dentin-Bonding Agents , Humans , Incisor , Maxilla , Methacrylates , Resin Cements , Resins, Plant , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
This study deals with some aspects of caries decay etiology and treatment using iontophoresis, when there is no cavity, and discusses remineralization of decayed teeth.