Early signaling of inflammation in patients following traumatic injury with accurately estimated time of injury by profiling C-reactive protein levels.

BACKGROUND: Despite its widespread use, the precise dynamics of CRP response in clinical practice remain poorly defined. We employed a novel quadratic model to explore the time-course analysis of CRP values in trauma patients with known precise time of injury. METHODS: Relevant data on all adult patients admitted to our hospital following traumatic incidents between January 1st 2010 to December 31, 2020 were retrospectively collected. Those with a documented time of injury and who underwent CRP evaluation within the first 24 h since injury were studied. RESULTS: Based on the findings from our annual health check-up center, we established a reference upper normal CRP value of 12.99 mg/L. Within the first 7 h after injury, the CRP levels of 8-9% of the 1545 study patients exceeded the reference threshold. The proportion of patients with CRP levels > 12.99 mg/L increased to 18.5% at 8-9 h later and rose sharply to 91.6% at 22-24 h later. Our quadratic model yielded the equation: CRP = 5.122-0.528xTime + 0.139xTime 2. It accounted for > 40% of the variance in CRP levels (R2 = 42.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Clear and prominent CRP elevations following atraumatic event are detected only 9-12 h following the insult. This novel finding has crucial implications for accurate CRP assessment of inflammatory responses to physical injuries.

Systemic antifungal therapy for oesophageal candidiasis - systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Oesophageal candidiasis is a common infection among individuals with immunosuppression, associated with significant morbidity. Available guidelines recommend fluconazole as the preferred treatment; however, data regarding its effectiveness in an era of increased fluconazole resistance has not been systematically compiled. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing systemic antifungal therapy for oesophageal candidiasis was undertaken. The primary outcome was clinical response. Subgroup analysis was planned based on immune status and Candida spp. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs were included, of which six compared fluconazole with other azoles, four compared fluconazole with echinocandins, and two compared amphotericin deoxycholate with echinocandins. Most RCTs mainly included human-immunodeficiency-virus-positive individuals. No significant differences were found between fluconazole and comparators for the outcomes of clinical response or combined clinical and endoscopic response [relative risk (RR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.07 and RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.98-1.15, respectively]. No differences were found between fluconazole and other azoles for other outcomes; however, compared with echinocandins, fluconazole had significantly higher mycological response rates and lower early relapse rates (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.17 and RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.68, respectively). No significant differences were demonstrated between fluconazole and comparators for overall or severe adverse events. Information required for the planned subgroup analyses was not available. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in efficacy or safety were found between fluconazole and other azoles for the treatment of candida oesophagitis. The use of echinocandins resulted in lower mycological cure rates and higher relapse rates. Additional RCTs should evaluate these interventions among broader patient populations and a wider spectrum of Candida spp.

Representation of women in editorial boards of infectious disease and microbiology journals-cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess whether there is an association between the proportion of female editors-in-chief and members of editorial boards in infectious disease (ID) and microbiology journals. METHODS: Our cross-sectional observational study included ID or microbiology journals according to the 2019 Clarivate Journal Citation Reports. Journals' Q ranking, open-access status, and number and gender of editors-in-chief and editorial board members were collected from the journals' official websites. We conducted a binary gender assignment for each editor using names, pictures, and other online descriptors. Journals with over 100 editorial board members and those with over 25% of board members for whom we could not determine gender were excluded. Editorial teams with >50% women were considered women dominant. Univariate and multivariable analyses for female editor dominance were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 167 journals were included, with total 6057 editorial members, 1655 (27.3%) of whom were women. Of 214 editors-in-chief, 48 (22%) were women, and only 25% (40 of 162) of journals had female editor-in-chief dominance. Factors associated with female dominance in the editor-in-chief role in univariate analysis were higher quartile rank, higher impact factor, and open access. Open-access journals remined significant in multivariable analysis (odds ratio (OR) 2.521; 95% CI, 1.140-5.576, p = 0.022). Larger editorial boards were less likely to have female dominance. Female editor-in-chief dominance was significantly associated with women-dominant editorial boards. DISCUSSION: ID and microbiology journals have significantly few women as editors-in-chief and editorial board members. Understanding the reasons for this inequality is required as an important step to confront and resolve it.

The Utility of Early Postoperative Neuroimaging in Elective/Semielective Craniotomy Patients: A Single-Arm Prospective Trial.

BACKGROUND: The necessity and timing of early postoperative imaging (POI) are debated in many studies. Despite the consensus that early POI does not change patient management, these examinations are routinely performed. This is the first prospective study related to POI. Our aims were to assess the necessity of early POI in asymptomatic patients and to verify accuracy of the presented algorithm. METHODS: This was an algorithm-based prospective single-center study. The algorithm addressed preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative considerations, including estimated pathology type, device placement, and postoperative neurologic change. Early computed tomography scans were obtained in all patients, but if postoperative algorithm indications did not recommend a scan, the treating team was blinded to them, and patient management was conducted based on clinical examinations alone. A neuroradiologist and study-independent neurosurgeon reviewed all the scans. RESULTS: Of 103 enrolled patients, 88 remained asymptomatic, and 15 experienced symptoms postoperatively. Pathology was present on POI in 1% of the asymptomatic patients and 53% of the symptomatic patients (P < 0.001). In the asymptomatic group, no treatment modifications were made postoperatively. Blinding of the surgical team was not removed, and 20% of the symptomatic patients returned to the operating room because of imaging and neurologic findings. The goal of <5% algorithm failure was reached with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic postoperative patients in whom early imaging is not performed for oncologic indications, device placement verification, or similar reasons, POI is unnecessary and does not change the management of these patients.