ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: WHO's three step ladder sometimes cannot provide adequate pain relief for pancreatic cancer. Some patients develop terminal delirium (TD). The aim of this study was to test if the addition of a celiac plexus block (CPB) to pharmacotherapy could reduce the incidence of TD. METHODS: Pancreatic cancer patients under the care of our palliative-care team were investigated with regard to the duration and occurrence of TD, pain scores [numerical rating score (NRS)] and daily opioid dose. Between August 2007 to September 2008, 17 patients received only pharmacotherapy (control group). Then, we modified our guideline for analgesia, performing CPB 7 days after the first intervention of our team. Between October 2008 to September 2009, 19 patients received CPB. RESULTS: The opioid doses in CPB group were significantly lower both at 10 days after the first intervention (3 days after CPB) (27 ± 11 vs. 66 ± 82 mg; p = 0.029) and 2 days before death (37 ± 25 vs. 124 ± 117 mg; p = 0.009). NRS in the CPB group were significantly lower both at 10 days after the first intervention (0 [0-2] vs. 3 [2-5], p < 0.0001) and 2 days before death (1 [0-2] vs. 3 [1-4.5], p = 0.018). The occurrence and duration of TD in CPB group were both reduced (42 vs. 94 %, p = 0.019; and 1.8 ± 2.9 vs. 10.4 ± 7.5 days, p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: The duration and occurrence of TD and the pain severity were significantly less in pancreatic cancer patients who underwent neurolytic CPB.
Subject(s)
Celiac Plexus , Delirium/etiology , Delirium/prevention & control , Nerve Block/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Aged , Delirium/psychology , Female , Humans , Hypotension/etiology , Karnofsky Performance Status , Male , Middle Aged , Nerve Block/adverse effects , Pain Measurement , Pain, Intractable/drug therapy , Pain, Intractable/etiology , Pain, Intractable/therapy , Palliative Care , Pancreatic Neoplasms/psychology , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Terminal Care , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Painful neuropathic conditions of cancer pain often show little response to nonopioid and opioid analgesics but may be eased by antidepressants and anticonvulsants. Although gabapentin is effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with cancer, some patients experience intolerable side effects sufficient to warrant discontinuation. The aim of this study was to see whether low-dose gabapentin is effective in treating cancer-related neuropathic pain when combined with low-dose imipramine. METHODS: Fifty-two cancer patients diagnosed as having neuropathic pain were allocated into four groups: G400-I group took gabapentin 200 mg and imipramine 10 mg every 12 h orally; G400 group took gabapentin 200 mg every 12 h orally; G800 group took gabapentin 400 mg every 12 h orally; I group took imipramine 10 mg every 12 h orally. RESULTS: Low-dose gabapentin-imipramine significantly decreased the total pain score and daily paroxysmal pain episodes. Several patients developed mild adverse symptoms in the four groups, and three patients discontinued treatment due to severe adverse events in the G800 group. CONCLUSION: Low-dose gabapentin-antidepressant combination with opioids was effective in managing neuropathic cancer pain without severe adverse effects.
