Significance of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer After Stent Placement: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To explore the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC) managed by self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement as a bridge to surgery (BTS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine patients with pathological stage II/III OCRC who underwent BTS using a SEMS were included in this multicenter retrospective study. Patients were divided into the no-adjuvant chemotherapy group (No-Adj group) (n=52) and adjuvant chemotherapy group (Adj group) (n=77), and relapse-free survival (RFS) was compared. RESULTS: The No-Adj group had more fragile patient background factors, such as higher age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and lower preoperative albumin compared with the Adj group. The 3-year RFS rates for the overall cohort were significantly different between the No-Adj and Adj groups (56.4% and 78.5%, respectively; p=0.003). Significant RFS benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy were observed in both pathological stage II and III cancer. Characteristics of more advanced cancer, such as high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), pathological T4, and lymphovascular invasion, were associated with survival improvement by adjuvant chemotherapy. T4 and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with RFS in the multivariate Cox proportional analysis. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to show a survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with OCRC undergoing BTS using a SEMS. Adjuvant chemotherapy is basically recommended regardless of the cancer stage and is strongly recommended with more advanced characteristics, such as high CEA, T4, and lymphovascular invasion.

Presurgical mild anemia is a risk factor for severe postoperative complications of rectal cancer surgery: A Japanese nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Background: Anemia has negative effects on long-term outcomes of rectal cancer patients; however, its status as a risk factor for severe complications is disputed. Perioperative risks may differ based on the severity of pre-surgical anemia; nonetheless, no previous study has investigated these differences. This study identified risks of severe postoperative complications in rectal cancer patients based on severity of their pre-surgical anemia. Materials and Methods: This study enrolled patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer and were registered in the Japanese National Clinical Database (NCD) between 2017 and 2019. Anemia severity was categorized into three levels: mild, moderate, and severe. A logistic regression model was applied to calculate the risk-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of severe complications after surgery. Results: This study analyzed a cohort of 51 765 rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection. Results showed that severe complications occurred in 10.9% of patients and were significantly more frequent in patients with anemia (13.6%) than those with normal hemoglobin levels (9.2%). Risk-adjusted ORs of severe complications in the severe, moderate, and mild anemia groups versus the normal group for males were 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.58), 1.47 (1.34-1.62), and 1.21 (1.12-1.31), respectively. Those for females were 1.39 (0.90-2.15), 1.64 (1.37-1.97), and 1.36 (1.16-1.58), respectively. Conclusions: According to this large cohort study, pre-surgical anemia significantly increases the risk of severe postoperative complications in rectal cancer patients. Even mild anemia presents a significant risk.

The benefits of interval appendectomy and risk factors for nonoperative management failure in the therapeutic strategy for complicated appendicitis.

PURPOSE: Emergency surgery (ES) for complicated appendicitis (CA) is associated with high morbidity. Interval appendectomy (IA) decreases this rate; however, nonoperative management (NOM) is not always successful. Some patients require unplanned ES due to NOM failure (IA failure: IA-F). This study aimed to verify the benefits of IA and to evaluate the risk factors for NOM failure. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with CA who underwent surgery between January 2012 and December 2021 were included in this study. We compared the surgical outcomes of the ES group with those of the IA success (IA-S) and IA-F groups. We also analyzed 14 factors that predicted NOM failure. RESULTS: Among 302 patients, the rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III) was significantly higher in the ES group (N = 165) than in the IA-S group (N = 102). The rates were equal between the ES (N = 165) and IA-F (N = 35) groups. NOM was successful in 110 patients and failed in 27. Lack of abscesses, comorbidities, high WBC count, and free air were independent risk factors for NOM failure. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the benefits of IA and the non-inferior surgical outcomes of IA-F compared to ES, IA is a good therapeutic strategy for CA. However, in patients exhibiting four independent risk factors for NOM failure, careful monitoring of unplanned ES is necessary.

Oncologic investigation of the interval from stent placement to surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is widely used as a bridge to surgery (BTS) procedure for obstructive colorectal cancer. However, evidence regarding the optimal interval between SEMS placement and elective surgery is lacking. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients with BTS between January 2013 and October 2021. Inverse probability treatment-weighted propensity score analyses were used to compare short- and long-term outcomes between the short-interval (SI) and long-interval (LI) groups, using a cutoff of 20 days. RESULTS: In total, 138 patients were enrolled in this study (SI group, n = 63; LI group, n = 75). In the matched cohort, the patients' backgrounds were well balanced. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications was not significantly different between the SI and LI groups (19.0% vs. 14.0%, P = 0.47). There were no significant differences between the SI and LI groups in the 3-year recurrence-free survival (68.0% vs. 76.4%, P = 0.73) or 3-year overall survival rates (86.0% vs. 90.6%, P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: A longer interval did not deteriorate the oncological outcomes. Individual perioperative management with an appropriate interval to improve the patient's condition is required to ensure safe surgery.

Pks-positive Escherichia coli in tumor tissue and surrounding normal mucosal tissue of colorectal cancer patients.

A significant association exists between the gut microbiome and colorectal carcinogenesis, as well as cancer progression. It has been reported that Escherichia coli (E. coli) containing polyketide synthetase (pks) island contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis by producing colibactin, a polyketide-peptide genotoxin. However, the functions of pks+ E. coli in initiation, proliferation, and metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unclear. We investigated the clinical significance of pks+ E. coli to clarify its functions in CRC. This study included 413 patients with CRC. Pks+ E. coli of tumor tissue and normal mucosal tissue were quantified using droplet digital PCR. Pks+ E. coli was more abundant in Stages 0-I tumor tissue than in normal mucosal tissue or in Stages II-IV tumor tissue. High abundance of pks+ E. coli in tumor tissue was significantly associated with shallower tumor depth (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.3-11.3, p < 0.001) and absence of lymph node metastasis (HR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.8-5.1, p < 0.001) in multivariable logistic analyses. Pks+ E. coli-low and -negative groups were significantly associated with shorter CRC-specific survival (HR = 6.4, 95% CI = 1.7-25.6, p = 0.005) and shorter relapse-free survival (HR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.3-7.3, p = 0.01) compared to the pks+ E. coli-high group. Pks+ E. coli was abundant in Stages 0-I CRC and associated with CRC prognosis. These results suggest that pks+ E. coli might contribute to carcinogenesis of CRC but might not be associated with tumor progression.

A pilot study on the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemo­adoptive immunotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

The safety and efficacy of combination therapy of immune cell therapy and chemotherapy [chemo-adoptive immunotherapy (CAIT)] for patients with stage IV or recurrent colorectal cancer have been reported. In the present study, the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant CAIT were investigated for preoperative therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer. The study included patients with cT3/T4 or cN (+) rectal adenocarcinoma scheduled for curative surgery. Six patients who consented to participate in the current study were selected as subjects. Neoadjuvant CAIT involves administration of activated autologous lymphocytes, αß T cells, and mFOLFOX6 every 2 weeks for six courses, followed by surgery 4-6 weeks thereafter. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 neutropenia was observed in one patient. Neoadjuvant CAIT and curative surgery were performed on all the patients. The confirmed response rate was 67%. Downstaging was confirmed in five patients (83%). Regarding histological effects, two patients were grade 1a and four were grade 2. Regarding immunological reactions, both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration rates increased after treatment in three patients on tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) analysis. In peripheral blood analysis, the total lymphocyte count was maintained in all patients, and the CD8+ T cell count increased by ≥3 times on the pretreatment count in two patients but may not be associated with changes in TILs. During the median postoperative follow-up duration of 24 months, liver and lung metastases occurred in one patient, but all patients survived. In conclusion, neoadjuvant CAIT (αß T cells + mFOLFOX6) can be safely administered for the treatment of advanced rectal cancer. Verification of the efficacy of comprehensive immune cell therapy, especially the induction of antitumor immunity for the prevention of recurrence, will be maintained. The current study is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; ID, jRCTc030190248; January 21, 2019).

Potential of Direct Oral Anticoagulant in Bleeding After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: An increasing number of patients are undergoing gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with active prescriptions of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Only a few reports have described the effects of DOAC intake on postoperative bleeding. We aimed to investigate the bleeding risk associated with DOACs after gastric ESD. METHODS: Clinical studies published up to April 2022 showing bleeding rates after gastric ESD in patients taking DOACs were identified using electronic searches. The primary outcome was the rate of bleeding after gastric ESD in patients receiving DOACs compared to those not receiving antithrombotic therapy. In this meta-analysis, odds ratios (ORs) were calculated and pooled using a random effects model. The secondary outcome was the difference in the bleeding rate between patients treated with DOACs and those treated with warfarin and antiplatelet drugs. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed that DOACs had a higher bleeding rate than non-thrombotic therapy (17.0% vs. 3.4%; OR 5.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.33-7.54; I2 = 0%). The bleeding risk associated with DOAC administration was similar to that associated with warfarin (17.0% vs. 20.0%; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.59-1.18; I2 = 0%), whereas it was higher than that associated with antiplatelet administration (16.9% vs. 11.0%; OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.14-2.34; I2 = 8%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis reveals that the bleeding risk of DOACs is higher than that of non-antithrombotics and antiplatelets, whereas it is comparable to that of warfarin. Gastric ESD in patients on anticoagulants requires careful postoperative management.

Successful management of malignant colovesical fistula using covered colonic self-expanding metallic stent: a case report.

BACKGROUND: A colovesical fistula (CVF) is commonly treated by resection of the intestine containing the fistula or creation of a defunctioning stoma. We herein report a case of successful fistula closure and avoidance of colostomy after placement of a covered colonic self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) as a palliative treatment for a malignant CVF. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old man undergoing infusional 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan chemotherapy plus bevacizumab for recurrent peritoneal dissemination of rectal cancer was admitted to our hospital because of fecaluria with a high-grade fever. Blood tests showed a moderate inflammatory reaction (white blood cell count, 9200/mm3; C-reactive protein, 11.03 mg/dL; procalcitonin, 1.33 ng/mL). Urinary sediment examination showed severe bacteriuria. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed intravesical gas, thickening of the posterior wall of the bladder, and irregular thickening of the sigmoid colon wall contiguous with the posterior bladder wall. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) clearly showed a fistula between the bladder and sigmoid colon. Colonoscopy revealed a circumferential malignant stricture 15 cm from the anal verge, and a fistula to the bladder was identified by water-soluble contrast medium. We diagnosed a complicated urinary tract infection (UTI) associated with a CVF due to peritoneal dissemination and started empirical treatment with sulbactam/ampicillin. Given the absence of active inflammatory findings around the fistula on MRI and the patient's physical frailty, we decided to place a covered SEMS to close the fistula. Under fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance, a covered colonic SEMS of 80-mm length and 20-mm diameter was successfully deployed, and the fistula was sealed immediately after placement. Urine culture on day 3 after stenting was negative for bacteria, and a contrast study on day 5 showed no fistula. The patient was discharged home on day 6 with no complications. The UTI did not recur for 4 months after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: A covered colonic SEMS was useful for sealing a malignant CVF in a patient unfit for surgery, and MRI was valuable to determine the status of the fistula. A covered colonic SEMS could be an alternative to surgical treatment for CVFs in patients who require palliative care.

A case report of anal fistula-associated mucinous adenocarcinoma developing 3 years after treatment of perianal abscess.

BACKGROUND: A long-standing (over 10 years) anal fistula is considered a fundamental cause of fistula-associated mucinous adenocarcinoma (FAMC). Perianal abscesses and anal fistulas are two sequential phases of the same anorectal infectious process. We experienced a case of FAMC which developed 3 years after the treatment of a perianal abscess. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because of progressive anal pain and a palpable tumor. She had a history of undergoing a drainage operation for a perianal abscess 3 years previously. A 15 × 15-mm tumor at the former drainage site was identified; transanal ultrasonography showed an intersphincteric fistula connecting to the tumor. A biopsy taken from the tumor demonstrated mucinous adenocarcinoma; the tumor was diagnosed as FAMC. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection was performed. Histopathology showed highly dysplastic cells lining the lumen of the anal fistula and poorly differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma proliferating in the dermis and epidermis in the distal aspect of the fistula. CONCLUSIONS: FAMC can develop within fewer than 3 years after the development of a perianal abscess and anal fistula.

Prognostic impact of postoperative infection after resection of biliary malignancy: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of postoperative infections in patients who underwent resection for biliary malignancy, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, distal cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder carcinoma, and carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. METHODS: This study was conducted in an 11-center retrospective cohort study. Patients with biliary tract cancer who underwent curative resection between April 2013 and March 2015 at 11 institutions in Japan were enrolled. We analyzed the prevalence of postoperative infection, infection-related factors, and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of the total 290 cases, 33 were intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 60 were perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, 120 were distal cholangiocarcinoma, 55 were gallbladder carcinoma, and 22 were carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Postoperative infectious complications, including remote infection, were observed in 146 patients (50.3%), and Clavien-Dindo ≥III in 115 patients (39.7%). Postoperative infections occurred more commonly in the patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy and bile duct resection. Patients with infectious complications had a significantly poorer prognosis than those without (median overall survival 38 months vs 62 months, P = .046). In a diagnosis-specific analysis, although there was no correlation between infectious complications and overall survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, distal cholangiocarcinoma, and carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, infectious complications were a significantly poor prognostic factor in gallbladder carcinoma (P = .031). CONCLUSION: Postoperative infection after surgery for biliary tract cancer commonly occurred, especially in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and bile duct resection. Postoperative infection is relatively associated with the prognosis of patients with biliary malignancy, especially gallbladder carcinoma.

Long-term outcomes between self-expandable metallic stent and transanal decompression tube for malignant large bowel obstruction: A multicenter retrospective study and meta-analysis.

Aim: To compare the oncological outcomes between self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery and transanal decompression tube (TDT) placement for malignant large bowel obstruction (MLBO). Methods: A total of 287 MLBO patients who underwent SEMS (n = 137) or TDT placement (n = 150) were enrolled in this multicenter retrospective study. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups were compared. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to calculate odd ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II and ≥III occurred frequently in the TDT group compared with the SEMS group (P = 0.002 and 0.005, respectively). The 3-y OS in the overall cohort and 3-y DFS in the pathological stage II/III cohort in the SEMS and TDT groups were 68.6% and 71.4%, and 71.0% and 72.6%, respectively. The survival differences were not significantly different in the OS and DFS analyses (P = 0.819 and P = 0.892, respectively). A meta-analysis of nine studies (including our cohort data) demonstrated no significant difference between the SEMS and TDT groups for 3-y OS and DFS (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.57-1.62, P = 0.89 and OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.46-1.04, P = 0.07, respectively). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that SEMS placement had no inferiority regarding long-term outcomes, including OS and DFS, compared with TDT placement. Considering the short-term benefits of SEMS placement, this could be a preferable preoperative decompression method for MLBO.

Survival impact of surgical site infection in esophageal cancer surgery: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Aim: This study was performed to evaluate the oncological impact of surgical site infection (SSI) and pneumonia on long-term outcomes after esophagectomy. Methods: The Japan Society for Surgical Infection conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study involving 407 patients with curative stage I/II/III esophageal cancer at 11 centers from April 2013 to March 2015. We investigated the association of SSI and postoperative pneumonia with oncological outcomes in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Ninety (22.1%), 65 (16.0%), and 22 (5.4%) patients had SSI, pneumonia, and both SSI and pneumonia, respectively. The univariate analysis demonstrated that SSI and pneumonia were associated with worse RFS and OS. In the multivariate analysis, however, only SSI had a significant negative impact on RFS (HR, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.36; P = 0.010) and OS (HR, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-3.01; P < 0.001). The presence of both SSI and pneumonia and the presence of severe SSI had profound negative oncological impacts. Diabetes mellitus and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of III were independent predictive factors for both SSI and pneumonia. The subgroup analysis showed that three-field lymph node dissection and neoadjuvant therapy canceled out the negative oncological impact of SSI on RFS. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that SSI, rather than pneumonia, after esophagectomy was associated with impaired oncological outcomes. Further progress in the development of strategies for SSI prevention may improve the quality of care and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing curative esophagectomy.

The colon inflammatory index score can predict the survival outcome after resection of colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicentre study.

PURPOSE: Many systemic inflammatory markers have been identified to be prognostic factors in various diseases, including colorectal cancer (CRC). The Colon Inflammatory Index (CII), which is based on the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), is reportedly a predictor of the outcome of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic CRC. This retrospective review study aimed to determine whether CII can predict the prognosis after surgical resection of CRC. METHODS: A total of 1,273 patients who underwent CRC resection were enrolled and divided into a training cohort (n = 799) and a validation cohort (n = 474). The impact of the preoperative CII score on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was assessed. RESULTS: In the training cohort, the CII score was good in 569 patients (71.2%), intermediate in 209 (26.2%), and poor in 21 (2.6%). There were significant between-group differences in body mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status, and preoperative tumour markers. The 5-year OS rate was significantly lower in patients with an intermediate or poor CII score (CII risk) than in those with no CII risk (73.8% vs. 84.2%; p < 0.001, log-rank test). In multivariate analysis, CII risk remained a significant independent predictor of poor OS (hazard ratio 1.75; 95% confidence interval 1.18-2.60; p = 0.006). In the validation cohort, the 5-year OS rate was significantly lower in patients with CII risk than in those with no CII risk (82.8% vs. 88.4%; p = 0.046, log-rank test). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the CII can predict OS after resection of CRC.

Segmental or right hemi-colectomy? The optimal surgical procedure for transverse colon cancer: a propensity score-matched, multicenter, retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Extended colectomy is sometimes chosen for treatment of transverse colon cancer (TCC) because of concerns about short- and long-term outcomes. However, there is still a lack of evidence regarding the optimal surgical procedure. METHODS: We retrospectively collected and analyzed data of patients who underwent surgical treatment of pathological stage II/III TCC at four hospitals from January 2011 to June 2019. We excluded the patients with TCC located at distal transverse colon, and just evaluated and analyzed proximal and middle third TCC. Inverse probability treatment-weighted propensity score analyses was used to compare short- and long-term outcomes between patients who underwent segmental transverse colectomy (STC) and those who underwent right hemicolectomy (RHC). RESULTS: In total, 106 patients were enrolled in this study (STC group, n = 45; RHC group, n = 61). The patients' backgrounds were well balanced after matching. The incidence of major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III) was not significantly different between the STC and RHC groups (4.5% vs. 5.6%, respectively; P = 0.53). The 3-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were not significantly different between the STC and RHC groups (88.2% vs. 81.8%, P = 0.86 and 90.3% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.79, respectively). CONCLUSION: RHC has no significant benefits over STC with respect to either short- or long-term outcomes. STC with necessary lymphadenectomy could be an optimal procedure for proximal and middle TCC.

Do postoperative infectious complications really affect long-term survival in colorectal cancer surgery? A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Aim: To investigate the impact of postoperative infection (PI), surgical site infection, and remote infection (RI), on long-term outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: The Japan Society for Surgical Infection conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study involving 1817 curative stage I/II/III CRC patients from April 2013 to March 2015. Patients were divided into the No-PI group and the PI group. We examined the association between PI and oncological outcomes for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score matching. Results: Two hundred and ninety-nine patients (16.5%) had PIs. The 5-year CSS and OS rates in the No-PI and PI groups were 92.8% and 87.6%, and 87.4% and 83.8%, respectively. Both the Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score matching demonstrated a significantly worse prognosis in the PI group than that in the No-PI group for CSS (hazard ratio: 1.60; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-2.34; P = .015 and P = .031, respectively) but not for OS. RI and the PI severity were not associated with oncological outcomes. The presence of PI abolished the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: These results suggest that PI after curative CRC surgery is associated with impaired oncological outcomes. This survival disadvantage of PI was primarily derived from surgical site infection, not RI, and PI induced lower efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy. Strategies to prevent PI and implement appropriate postoperative treatment may improve the quality of care and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing curative CRC surgery.

Feeding gastrostomy and duodenostomy using the round ligament of the liver versus conventional feeding jejunostomy after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis.

Esophageal cancer patients require enteral nutritional support after esophagectomy. Conventional feeding enterostomy to the jejunum (FJ) is occasionally associated with small bowel obstruction because the jejunum is fixed to the abdominal wall. Feeding through an enteral feeding tube inserted through the reconstructed gastric tube (FG) or the duodenum (FD) using the round ligament of the liver have been suggested as alternatives. This meta-analysis aimed to compare short-term outcomes between FG/FD and FJ. Studies published prior to May 2022 that compared FG or FD with FJ in cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy were identified via electronic literature search. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model to calculate Odds Ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Five studies met inclusion criteria to yield a total of 1687 patients. Compared with the FJ group, the odds of small bowel obstruction (OR 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.33), catheter site infection (OR 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.51) and anastomotic leakage (OR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.89) were lower for the FG/FD group. Odds of pneumonia, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, chylothorax and hospital mortality did not significantly differ between the groups. The length of hospital stay was shorter for the FG/FD group (median difference, -10.83; 95% CI, -18.55 to -3.11). FG and FD using the round ligament of the liver were associated with lower odds of small bowel obstruction, catheter site infection and anastomotic leakage than FJ in esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy.

Postoperative infectious complications have a negative oncological impact in patients after stent placement with malignant large bowel obstruction.

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to investigate the oncological impact of postoperative infection in patients with malignant large bowel obstruction managed by self-expandable metallic stent placement as a bridge to surgery. METHODS: The cohort of this multicenter retrospective study comprised 129 patients with pathological stage II/III malignant large bowel obstruction who had undergone bridge to surgery. Patients were allocated to no-postoperative infection (n = 116) and postoperative infection groups (n = 13). RESULTS: The postoperative infection group had a significantly greater proportion of men, fewer harvested lymph nodes, and longer postoperative hospital stays than did the no-postoperative infection group. Self-expandable metallic stent-related variables, including clinical failure, were not associated with postoperative infection. Male sex and low body mass index were identified as risk factors for postoperative infection by multivariate logistic regression. Three-year relapse-free survival rates were 75.5% and 30.8% in the no-postoperative infection and postoperative infection groups, respectively; this difference is statistically significant. Male sex, postoperative infection, and T4 were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. The postoperative infection group had a significantly higher total recurrence rate and shorter interval to recurrence than did the no-postoperative infection group. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show that postoperative infection in bridge to surgery patients has a negative oncological impact. This finding indicates that further improvement in perioperative management of bridge to surgery patients is required to minimize postoperative infection and that patient-risk stratification and additional therapy would contribute to improving oncological outcomes.

The T-CEA score: a useful prognostic indicator based on postoperative CEA and pathological T4 levels for patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate a prognostic score for stage II-III colorectal cancer (CRC) based on post-CEA and pT4 levels. METHODS: Two cohorts of stage II-III CRC patients who underwent curative surgery between 2011 and 2017 were included. The prognostic score (T-CEA score) was calculated as follows: T-CEA-0, post-CEA ≤ 5 ng/mL and pT1-3; T-CEA-1, post-CEA > 5 ng/mL or pT4; T-CEA-2, post-CEA > 5 ng/mL and pT4. RESULTS: The T-CEA scores of the 587 patients were as follows: T-CEA-0 (n = 436; 74%), T-CEA-1 (n = 129; 22%), and T-CEA-2 (n = 10; 2%). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of the T-CEA-0, 1, and 2 groups were 80.3%, 54.8%, and 0%, respectively (P < 0.01), and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 90.9%, 74.2%, and 0%, respectively (T-CEA-0 vs T-CEA-1: P < 0.01, T-CEA-1 vs T-CEA-2: P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed that an elevated T-CEA score of 1 or 2 was a significant risk factor for poor RFS (HR: 2.89, P < 0.01) and OS (HR: 2.85, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The T-CEA score is a reliable and convenient prognostic score for stage II-III CRC.

Useful Preoperative Simulation of Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Patients with Kyphosis.

Kyphosis complicates abdominal surgery. Here, we report a case of rectal cancer in a patient with kyphosis who underwent successful laparoscopic surgery after a preoperative simulation. An 81-year-old woman with rectal cancer was admitted to our department, and laparoscopic surgery was planned. Physical examination revealed severe kyphosis. To ensure successful laparoscopic surgery, we conducted a detailed preoperative simulation, including three-dimensional CT simulations of port arrangement and anatomy, simulation of body position, selection of surgical instruments, and preoperative discussion with the anesthesiologist. We planned to insert the first port in the umbilical region for pneumoperitoneum and the camera port in the ventral region under pneumoperitoneum. We planned to insert the ports on the right side of the patient's body from the caudal regions, after considering the location of the inferior mesenteric artery and the limitations in degrees and space attributable to the costal arch and promontorium. Beach chair position was planned. We used a fan-shaped retractor and sponge retractor to remove the small intestine from the surgical view. In preoperative discussions with the anesthesiologist, we decided to maintain pneumoperitoneum pressure at less than 8 mm Hg during the operation, to safeguard respiratory function. Lower anterior resection with D2 lymph node dissection was performed, without intraoperative complications. At 2 years postoperatively, the patient was healthy with no signs of recurrence. Laparoscopic surgery appears to be a suitable choice for patients with kyphosis. We believe that preoperative simulation will result in successful outcomes.

A Case of a Fixed Giant Peritoneal Loose Body outside the Peritoneum and near the Rectovesical Excavation.

A peritoneal loose body (PLB) is tissue completely separated from other intraperitoneal organs. It is rare and usually found incidentally during laparotomy, examination, or autopsy. PLBs are usually located free in the peritoneal cavity and not in the extraperitoneal space. They are thought to originate when epiploic appendices are released into the abdominal cavity after ischemic necrosis. We report a case of a giant PLB outside the peritoneal cavity, adjacent to the rectovesical excavation, that was identified preoperatively inan asymptomatic 83-year-old man undergoing evaluation for cholecystolithiasis. Computed tomography revealed a mass with well-defined margins in the rectovesical excavation. The mass (diameter, 60 mm) consisted of a calcified core and peripheral soft tissue and did not appear to invade adjacent organs. Although there were no symptoms or tumor growth over time, we scheduled a laparoscopic extraction for definitive diagnosis. On laparoscopic exploration, a white ovoid mass was found in the rectovesical excavation; there was no invasion of adjacent organs. We diagnosed a giant PLB. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Most PLBs are asymptomatic and do not require surgery, except when symptoms are present, when the PLB is large, or when malignancy is suspected. PLB is rarely extraperitoneal and is usually freely mobile; however, in our patient, it was fixed and outside the abdominal cavity, near the rectovesical fossa. Although it could not be diagnosed preoperatively as being extraperitoneal, imaging findings were typical of PLB; thus, it was possible to remove the mass laparoscopically without bowel resection.