Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) ; 71(1): 41-51, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36596511

ABSTRACT

Globalization of pharmaceutical supply chains has expanded and manufacturers are required to manufacture products in compliance with the pharmacopoeial standards used in all exporting countries/regions to ensure product quality. International harmonization has been facilitated by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group consisting of the Japanese Pharmacopoeia, the United States Pharmacopeia, and the European Pharmacopoeia. However, since the pharmacopoeias have been developed individually under the regulatory framework of each country/region, differences exist between these pharmacopoeias. When using pharmacopoeias, an understanding of common pharmacopoeial rules is essential. Clarifying the similarities and differences in the General Notices of the pharmacopoeias widely referenced worldwide is considered valuable for those already using one or two of them to access the remaining pharmacopoeias. In this study, we compared the existence of items and the contents described in the General Notices of the three pharmacopoeias to clarify the differences. Investigation of the existence of items revealed that more than 70% of the 105 items in General Notices in the three pharmacopoeias were in the entire pharmacopoeias (for Japan, including Japanese laws and notifications). Furthermore, investigating contents revealed that approximately 20% of the 105 items have some differences such as numerical values and test conditions. However, it was shown that most of the items did not have major differences. It is expected that the three pharmacopoeias will be utilized simultaneously by understanding the similarities and differences shown in this study.


Subject(s)
International Cooperation , United States , Japan , Europe
2.
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) ; 68(11): 1034-1048, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33132370

ABSTRACT

In line with the recent globalization of the drug supply chain and promotion of the use of generic drugs worldwide, quality assurance is required for drugs globally. In particular, controlling impurities is one of the biggest areas of interest regarding pharmaceutical quality, and it is desirable that the latest scientific standards harmonized in the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) are not only implemented in approval applications but also incorporated in pharmacopoeias which are public standards to ensure pharmaceutical quality more widely. However, incorporation into a pharmacopoeia takes time because careful consideration is required owing to the characteristics of a pharmacopoeia that is widely used for drugs, including those already on the market. To consider a smooth approach for the incorporation, we retrospectively examined approaches to incorporate the concepts of the ICH Q3C, Q3D, and M7 guidelines covering residual solvents, elemental impurities, and mutagenic impurities which are particularly toxic impurities into the European Pharmacopoeia, United States Pharmacopeia-National Formulary, and Japanese Pharmacopoeia, with approaches to implement these guidelines into approval processes in Europe, the U.S., and Japan. We also identified barriers and facilitators to this goal via cause and effect analysis. Moreover, we developed a logic model for the smooth incorporation of the concepts of impurity-related ICH guidelines. We expect that our proposed approach will be applied as a framework to smoothly incorporate the results of international harmonization activities for controlling impurities into each pharmacopoeia.


Subject(s)
Drugs, Generic/standards , Models, Theoretical , Drug Contamination/prevention & control , Drugs, Generic/analysis , Europe , Guidelines as Topic , Japan , Pharmacopoeias as Topic , United States
3.
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) ; 67(12): 1301-1313, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31787657

ABSTRACT

A pharmacopoeia's core mission is to protect public health by creating and making available public standards to help ensure the quality of drugs. In recent years, pharmacopoeias around the world have harmonized their standards in the present context of globalized drug supply chains and markets. For example, the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group has worked to harmonize excipient monographs and general chapters. In addition, the International Meeting of World Pharmacopoeias has been held by the WHO to discuss information exchange and international collaboration, among other topics. To contribute further to the protection of public health in the globalized drug market, we conducted a comparative study of the pharmacopoeias in Japan, Europe, and the United States. We aimed to examine current differences among the Japanese Pharmacopoeia, the European Pharmacopoeia, and the United States Pharmacopeia-National Formulary and to identify areas that require further collaboration among the three pharmacopoeias. In this study, we analyzed monographs and general chapters listed in the three pharmacopoeias. We identified the features of the monographs and general chapters listed in each pharmacopoeia, as well as differences across the pharmacopoeias. Moreover, on the basis of our findings, we suggest standards that require further collaboration among the pharmacopoeias in certain preferred areas. The comparison data produced by this study are expected to be used to develop strategies for future revisions of pharmacopoeias around the world.


Subject(s)
Chemistry, Pharmaceutical/standards , Europe , Humans , Japan , United States
4.
J Pharm Pharm Sci ; 19(2): 290-301, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27518176

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A gap analysis survey of international practices for Active Substance Master Files (ASMFs)/Drug Master Files (DMFs) of human use was conducted as a project of the ASMF/DMF working group of the International Generic Drug Regulators Pilot (IGDRP) to identify similarities and differences among ASMF/DMF procedures of 10 IGDRP members and 2 observers. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire survey and compared the following aspects: overall ASMF/DMF procedures, submission requirements for ASMFs/DMFs, assessment processes for ASMFs/DMFs, the technical requirements for active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), generation of assessment reports for ASMFs/DMFs, procedures for changing ASMF/DMF details, and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) inspection/certification of API manufacturers. Twelve organizations participated in this project: the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa), the European Union (EU), Health Canada (HC), the Singapore Health Sciences Authority (HSA), the South African Medicines Control Council (MCC), the South Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic), the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration (TFDA), the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) (Observer) and the Prequalification Team (PQT) of the World Health Organization (WHO), which includes the PQT-Medicines (Observer). RESULTS: Although there were many similarities among the participating agencies surveyed, there were also differences that should be discussed such as assessment processes of ASMFs/DMFs and Technical requirements for APIs. CONCLUSIONS: These differences revealed by this survey will be key considerations in order to facilitate the filing of ASMFs/DMFs globally and to establish a framework for sharing and utilizing information related to ASMFs/DMFs among IGDRP members in the future. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.


Subject(s)
Government Regulation , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Humans , United States , World Health Organization
5.
AAPS J ; 17(5): 1312-6, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25943503

ABSTRACT

Generic drugs are interchangeable with original proprietary drugs, as they have the same active pharmaceutical ingredients, dosage forms, strength, quality, indications, effects, directions, and dosage. The cost of generic drugs is lower than original drugs, because the developmental cost is lower. The expansion of medical expenses is an important issue in many countries, including Japan, the USA, and Europe, and promotion of generic drugs has been demanded to solve this issue in Japan. Generic drug approval review in Japan is conducted by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), which reviews the equivalence of the original drugs from the viewpoint of quality, efficacy, and safety, based on documentation submitted by the generic drug applicants. However, the details of the generic drug review in Japan have not been reported. In this report, we introduce the application types, the number of applications and approvals, and the review timeline of generic drugs in Japan. In addition, we discuss recent consultations and future prospects.


Subject(s)
Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Drugs, Generic/administration & dosage , Legislation, Drug , Drug Costs , Drugs, Generic/economics , Humans , Japan
6.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ; 95(2): 451-60, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22388571

ABSTRACT

The biosynthetic gene cluster for lariatins A and B, anti-mycobacterial peptide antibiotics with a unique "lasso" structure, was cloned from Gram-positive bacterium Rhodococcus jostii K01-B0171. Random transposition mutagenesis using IS1415 derivative was carried out to identify a chromosomal locus involved in lariatin biosynthesis and six independent lariatin non-producing variants were obtained. Arbitrary PCR revealed that one insertion was located near the region involved in lariatin biosynthesis. Using the lariatin gene as a probe, a genomic library of R. jostii K01-B0171 was screened by colony hybridization, and two clones were obtained. Sequence analysis of these clones revealed that the gene cluster for lariatin biosynthesis spanning about 4.5 kb consisted of five open reading frames (larA to larE). We proposed that the linear precursor LarA is processed by LarB, LarC, and LarD, and the mature lariatin is exported by LarE.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/metabolism , Biosynthetic Pathways/genetics , Multigene Family , Peptides, Cyclic/biosynthesis , Rhodococcus/genetics , Rhodococcus/metabolism , Cloning, Molecular , DNA Transposable Elements , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Gene Deletion , Molecular Sequence Data , Mutagenesis, Insertional , Open Reading Frames , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sequence Analysis, DNA
7.
J Antibiot (Tokyo) ; 62(1): 51-4, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19132064

ABSTRACT

Two isozymes for human acyl-coenzyme A:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT), DGAT1 and DGAT2, were independently expressed in DGAT-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae to establish DGAT1- and DGAT2-S. cerevisiae. The selectivity of DGAT inhibitors of natural origin towards the isozymes was assessed in enzyme assays using the microsomal fractions prepared from DGAT1- and DGAT2-S. cerevisiae. Amidepsines and xanthohumol inhibited DGAT1 and DGAT2 with similar potency, whereas roselipins were found to inhibit DGAT2 selectively.


Subject(s)
Diacylglycerol O-Acyltransferase/antagonists & inhibitors , Diacylglycerol O-Acyltransferase/biosynthesis , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/enzymology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Animals , DNA, Complementary/genetics , Diacylglycerol O-Acyltransferase/genetics , Enzyme Inhibitors/chemistry , Humans , Isoenzymes/antagonists & inhibitors , Isoenzymes/biosynthesis , Liver/enzymology , Molecular Sequence Data , Plasmids/genetics , Rats , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...