Double plating via anterolateral and posterolateral approach for distal femoral fracture.

Although there are some reports highlighting the applicability of double plates in distal femoral fractures, there is no standard approach or fixation method for supracondylar fractures combined with posterior coronal shear fractures. We report a case of distal femoral fracture treated with a lateral locking plate and posterior buttress plate using anterolateral and posterolateral approaches from one incision. A 70-year-old man was hit by a motorcycle and had an intra-articular distal femoral fracture involving a long medial proximal spike and a single lateral condyle fragment, with the lateral condyle fragment posteriorly displaced. A 12-cm lateral skin incision was made, and the joint was developed using a para-patellar approach from the anterior to iliotibial band. Posterior buttress plate fixation was successfully performed from behind the iliotibial band using a posterolateral approach, followed by cannulated cancellous screw and lateral locking plate fixation from the anterolateral window. Combined anterolateral and posterolateral approaches from one incision enable intra-articular exposure and fixation based on fixation principles for lateral condyle fragments combined with supracondylar fracture.

Significant Correlates of Nocturnal Hypertension in Patients With Hypertension Who Are Treated With Antihypertensive Drugs.

BACKGROUND: Nocturnal hypertension assessed by a home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) device is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. However, it is still difficult to assess nighttime blood pressure (BP) frequently. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to identify significant correlates of nocturnal hypertension assessed by an HBPM device in patients with hypertension who are treated with antihypertensive drugs. METHODS: We measured nighttime BP, morning BP, and evening BP by an HBPM device for 7 consecutive days in 365 medicated patients with hypertension. RESULTS: Of the 365 subjects, 138 (37.8%) had nocturnal hypertension defined as a mean nighttime systolic BP of ≥ 120 mm Hg. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that the diagnostic accuracy of morning systolic BP for subjects with nocturnal hypertension was significantly superior to that of evening systolic BP (P = 0.04) and that of office systolic BP (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that morning systolic BP of 125-<135 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR], 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-4.58; P = 0.02), morning systolic BP of ≥ 135 mm Hg (OR, 16.4; 95% CI, 8.20-32.7; P < 0.001), and a history of cerebrovascular disease (OR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.75-9.13; P = 0.001) were significantly associated with a higher risk of nocturnal hypertension and that bedtime dosing of antihypertensive drugs was significantly associated with a lower risk of nocturnal hypertension (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.97; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Morning systolic BP of ≥ 125 mm Hg, a history of cerebrovascular disease, and bedtime dosing were significant correlates of nocturnal hypertension in medicated patients with hypertension, and may help detect this risky BP condition. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000019173).

Coronal shear fractures of the femoral neck: a comparison with basicervical fractures.

PURPOSE: We propose coronal shear fracture of the femoral neck (CSFF) as a new type of fracture that differs from a basicervical fracture. This study aimed to present the incidence of CSFF and compare its clinical characteristics and outcomes with those of basicervical fractures. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 2207 patients with hip fractures were identified using computed tomography (CT), 17 and 27 patients were diagnosed with CSFF (CSFF group) and basicervical fractures (basicervical fracture group), respectively. The primary outcome was reoperation, while the secondary outcomes were postoperative radiographic findings, ambulatory ability, and 1-year mortality rate. These outcomes were compared between the two groups. We also conducted diagnostic reliability tests for these fractures using the Cohen's kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The incidence of CSFF and basicervical fractures in the 2207 patients were 0.77% and 1.22%, respectively. The inter-and intra-observer agreements for the diagnosis were almost perfect. The comorbidity score was significantly higher in the CSFF group than in the basicervical fracture group. No reoperations occurred in both groups. There were no significant intergroup differences in the postoperative radiographic findings. The 1-year mortality rate was higher in the CSFF group than in the basicervical fracture group (38.5% vs. 5.3%; odds ratio: 11.9, 95% CI: 1.2-118.5; p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: This study presents the definition and incidence of CSFF with a high diagnostic reliability. Patients with CSFF had similar reoperation rate postoperative radiographic outcomes to basicervical fractures, while 1-year mortality rate was high.

Late-onset implant-related neuropathy: Three years after proximal humeral fracture.

There are currently no reports of implant-related neuropathy associated with humeral proximal fracture surgery. Herein, we report a case of implant-related late-onset neuropathy that developed 3 years after proximal humeral fracture surgery. A 51-year-old man underwent minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for a left proximal humeral fracture 3 years prior. Left upper limb pain and reduced angle of elevation of the shoulder were recognized 1 month before the outpatient consultation. Numbness was noted on the ulnar side of the hand, and radiating pain to the ulnar nerve region was noted during shoulder abduction and compression of the medial side of the upper arm. Computed tomography revealed close proximity of the neurovascular bundle to the locking screw along with muscle atrophy around the shoulder. Hence, the patient was diagnosed with neuropathy. After implant removal, the pain in the ulnar nerve region improved, and the upper arm could be elevated. In our case, the cause of muscle atrophy was axillary nerve manipulation and cervical myelopathy caused by the operation. When late-onset neuropathy occurs, implant-related neuropathy with muscle atrophy should be considered.

Intraoperative fractures in cephalomedullary nailing for trochanteric fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) is the standard treatment for internal fixation of trochanteric fractures. Complications related to CMN include intraoperative fracture (IF), which is difficult to detect using only plain radiographs. However, analyses of IFs using plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) with a large sample size of clinical cases are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to report the incidence of IFs diagnosed by CT, the risk factors for IFs, and a comparison of clinical outcomes between patients with and without IFs. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 638 patients who underwent CMN fixation for trochanteric fractures. We evaluated IF using pre-and postoperative plain radiographs and CT. The primary outcome was reoperation and the secondary outcome was the proportion of patients who regained independent mobility at 3 months postoperatively. Furthermore, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association between risk factors and IFs. RESULTS: Seventy-five (11.8%) patients had IFs, including 53 patients with occult IFs (8.3%). The most common location of IF was at the interference with the lag screw entry (45.3%). The nail insertion procedure (17.3%) was the most common reason for IF. In the assessment of clinical outcomes, patients with IFs had no reoperations and independent mobility at postoperative 3 months was lower (69.6% vs. 79.1%). Regarding regaining independent walking in the IF group, IF distal to lag screw entry and obvious IF diagnosed with plain radiographs were poor factors. The multivariable analysis showed that only inadequate reduction on the anteroposterior view based on the plain radiograph was significantly associated with the incidence of IFs (odds ratio 3.91; 95% CI, 1.28-11.94; p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study indicated that the incidence of IFs detected by CT in CMN treatment for trochanteric fractures was 11.8%. An inadequate reduction in the anteroposterior view based on plain radiographs was the only independent risk factor of IFs. In the assessment of clinical outcomes, patients with IF had no incidences of reoperation. However, patients with IFs tended not to regain independent mobility compared with those without IFs.

Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures.

Anteroposterior (AP) alignment assessment for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures is important for determining the treatment strategy and predicting postoperative outcomes. AP alignment is generally measured using the Garden alignment index (GAI). However, its reliability remains unknown. We compared the reliability of GAI and a new AP alignment measurement (valgus tilt measurement [VTM]) using preoperative AP radiographs of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. The study was designed as an intra- and inter-rater reliability analysis. The raters were four trauma surgeons who assessed 50 images twice. The main outcome was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To calculate intra- and inter-rater reliability, we used a mixed-effects model considering rater, patient, and time. The overall ICC (95% CI) of GAI and VTM for intra-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89−0.94) and 0.86 (0.82−0.89), respectively. The overall ICC of GAI and VTM for inter-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89−0.95), and 0.85 (0.81−0.88), respectively. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of GAI was higher in patients aged <80 years than in patients aged ≥80 years. Our results showed that GAI is a more reliable measurement method than VTM, although both are reliable. Variations in patient age should be considered in GAI measurements.

Early predictors for massive transfusion in older adult severe trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Many scoring systems for the early prediction of the need for massive transfusion (MT) have been reported; in most of these, vital signs are regarded as important. However, the validity of these scoring systems in older patients remains unclear because older trauma patients often present with normal vital signs. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of previously described scoring systems, as well as risk factors that can provide early prediction of the need for MT in older severe trauma patients. METHODS: We prospectively collected data from a cohort of severe trauma patients (ISS ≥16 and age ≥16years) admitted from January 2007 to March 2015. Trauma Associated Severe Hemorrhage (TASH), Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC), and Prince of Wales Hospital (PWH) scores were compared between a younger and an older group. Furthermore, the predictors associated with MT in older severe trauma patients were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) was significantly smaller for older group than for younger group for all three scoring systems (p<0.05). The most important risk factors to predict the need for MT were related to anatomical factors including FAST results (odds ratio (OR): 5.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.10-14.99), unstable pelvic fracture (OR: 21.56, 95% CI: 6.05-90.78), and long bone open fracture of the lower limbs (OR: 12.21, 95% CI: 4.04-39.09), along with pre-injury anticoagulant agent use (OR: 5.22, 95% CI: 1.30-19.61), antiplatelet agent use (OR: 3.81, 95% CI: 1.57-9.04), lactate levels (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39) and shock index (OR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.05-6.84). Traditional vital signs were not early risk factors. CONCLUSION: We suggest that MT in older trauma patients should be considered on the basis of anatomical factors, pre-injury anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent use, lactate level and SI even if traditional vital signs are normal.

Bleeding sites in elderly trauma patients who required massive transfusion: a comparison with younger patients.

INTRODUCTION: Among elderly patients with severe trauma, the sites of massive hemorrhage and their clinical characteristics are not well understood. Therefore, we investigated the sites of massive hemorrhage in patients with severe trauma, and compared the results for younger and elderly patients. METHODS: A cohort of severe trauma patients (Injury Severity Score ≥16) admitted from March 2007 to December 2014 was reviewed retrospectively. The inclusion criterion was massive bleeding, which was defined as bleeding that required the transfusion of ≥10 red cell concentrate units within 24 hours of admission, or as cases of early death that occurred despite continuous blood transfusion and before the patient could receive ≥10 red cell concentrate units within the first 24 hours after their admission. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients met our inclusion criterion. The younger group (<65 years old) included 40 patients (48%), whereas the older group (≥65 years old) included 44 patients (52%). The percentage of nondiagnosable cases at the primary survey (massive bleeding due to multisite damage caused by a bone fracture or contusion, retroperitoneal hematoma without a pelvic ring fracture and with stable pelvic ring fracture) was 14% in the younger group and 40% in the older group (odds ratio, 3.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-11.27, P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Even if no abnormalities are observed at the primary survey of elderly patients with severe trauma, physicians should consider the possibility of massive bleeding.