Outcomes of Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema That Are Lost to Follow-up After Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of loss to follow-up (LTFU) on outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Single-center study of 90 eyes of 73 patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and DME treated with anti-VEGF injections who were LTFU for >6 months. Main outcomes were the change in mean visual acuity (VA) and central foveal thickness at the return and final visits compared with the visit before LTFU. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.5 years, the mean LTFU duration was 322 days, and the mean follow-up duration after return was 502 days. Compared with the mean VA at the visit before LTFU (0.42, Snellen ∼20/52), mean VA worsened at the return visit (0.54, Snellen ∼20/69, P = .004). No significant change in the mean VA was noted at the 3-month after return visit (0.50, Snellen ∼20/63), the 6-month after return visit (0.46, Snellen ∼20/57), the 12-month after return visit (0.42, Snellen ∼20/52), or the final follow-up (0.47, Snellen ∼20/59). When analyzed by NPDR severity before LTFU, no difference in VA was found from the visit before LTFU to the final visit. Mean central foveal thickness increased when comparing the visit before LTFU (270 µm) with the return visit (305 µm, P = .012), but no difference was found by the final visit (247 µm, P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-VEGF-treated patients with DME who were LTFU for a prolonged period experienced a modest decline in VA that recovered after restarting treatment.

The Timing of Large Submacular Hemorrhage Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration Relative to Anti-VEGF Therapy.

PURPOSE: To characterize the timing of large submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) relative to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective, consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 46 eyes of 46 patients with large SMH resulting from neovascular AMD selected to undergo pars plana vitrectomy with subretinal tissue plasminogen activator at the Mid Atlantic Retina group of the Wills Eye Hospital. METHODS: Patient charts were reviewed to identify baseline characteristics and anti-VEGF treatment details. OCT was used to evaluate pigmented epithelial detachments, SMH, and subretinal fluid before and after SMH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The timing of SMH in relation to last anti-VEGF injection, the anti-VEGF treatment status (i.e., naive, stable, or recently extended or shortened) at the time of SMH, and the length of the anti-VEGF treatment interval at the time of bleeding. RESULTS: Submacular hemorrhage occurred in 15 patients (36%) who were treatment naive. In patients treated with anti-VEGF, 19 (45%) had a stable treatment interval, 5 (12%) had a recently extended interval, and 3 (7%) had a shortened interval. The average treatment interval at the time of SMH was 6.8 weeks with a median of 7 total injections before SMH. Seven treated patients (26%) experience an SMH while having a 4-week dosing interval. The average time between last injection and SMH was 29 days. Forty-eight percent of patients treated with anti-VEGF agents experienced an SMH within 30 days of anti-VEGF injection. Chi-square analysis found SMH more likely to occur within 30 days of anti-VEGF injection than after 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Large SMH in neovascular AMD in a treat-and-extend regimen does not seem to be associated with prolonged dosing intervals or recent interval extension, and a large proportion of such hemorrhages are likely to be a result of mechanisms other than loss of effective VEGF inhibition.

Endogenous Bacterial Endophthalmitis: A Five-Year Retrospective Review at a Tertiary Care Academic Center.

PURPOSE: To better characterize the demographics and outcomes of endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis (EBE). METHODS: Retrospective observational case series of 49 eyes of 41 patients with EBE evaluated at a single academic center. RESULTS: Gram stain (p = .395), symptom duration prior to treatment (p = .483), and number of intravitreal antimicrobial injections (p = .421) did not correlate with mean change in VA. There was no significant difference between mean LogMAR VA at initial evaluation (1.7 ± 0.9) and last available follow up (1.4 ± 1.1, p = .15). Patients with bilateral EBE had 7.25 times greater odds of having cancer (95% CI 1.28, 41.14; p = .025). CONCLUSION: EBE in a North American population showed poor visual recovery despite treatment. It was most commonly due to gram-positive bacteria with the most common infectious source being endocarditis. Malignancy should be considered in patients with bilateral EBE.

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of Diabetic Retinopathy in Human Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a novel, non-invasive OCT technique capable of imaging the retinal vasculature. This study aims to evaluate the retinal microvasculature in diabetic human subjects with OCTA and assess potential clinical applications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 33 subjects with diabetic retinopathy. OCTA was performed on 3 mm × 3 mm sections using a swept-source OCTA prototype and a phase- and intensity-based contrasting algorithm. OCT angiograms were studied with corresponding clinical examination and fluorescein angiograms, when available, to assess accuracy and clinical utility. RESULTS: OCTA was able to demonstrate most clinically relevant vascular changes in subjects with diabetic retinopathy, including microaneurysms, impaired vascular perfusion, some forms of intraretinal fluid, vascular loops, intraretinal microvascular abnormalities, neovascularization, and cotton-wool spots that were largely consistent with fluorescein angiography. CONCLUSION: OCTA generates high-resolution angiograms that illustrate many of the clinically relevant findings in diabetic retinopathy and offers a novel complement or alternative to fluorescein angiography. Although currently an investigational technique, OCTA in combination with standard OCT imaging is at least as good as fluorescein angiography in the evaluation of the macular complications of diabetic retinopathy.

Exposure to a histone deacetylase inhibitor has detrimental effects on human lymphocyte viability and function.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) have been reported to increase tumor antigen expression, and have been successfully tested as adjuvants for melanoma immunotherapy in mouse models. In this work, we tested the effects of a pan-HDACi on human lymphocytes and melanoma cell lines. Effects of the pan-HDACi panobinostat (LBH589) on cell viability, cell cycle, apoptosis, and DNA damage were determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 2 healthy donors, 13 patients with metastatic melanoma, 2 bone marrow samples from patients with different malignances, and 12 human melanoma cell lines. Intracellular signaling in lymphocytes, with or without cytokine stimulation, was analyzed by phospho-flow cytometry in one of each type. The IC50 in PBMCs was <20 nmol/L compared with >600 nmol/L in melanoma cell lines; >40% apoptotic cell death in PBMCs versus <10% in melanoma cell lines was seen at the same concentration. Phospho-histone variant H2A.X (pH2A.X) increased 2-fold in healthy donor PBMCs at 1 nmol/L, whereas the same effect in the melanoma cell line M229 required 10 nmol/L. pH2A.X was inhibited slightly in the PBMCs of 3 patients with metastatic melanoma at 1 nmol/L and in the melanoma cell line M370 at 10 nmol/L. Panobinostat inhibited phospho-STAT1/3/5/6, -p38, -ERK, -p53, -cyclin D3, and -histone H3 in flow cytometry-gated healthy donor B and T cells, whereas it induced up to 6-fold activation in patients with metastatic melanoma and bone marrow samples. In human lymphocytes, panobinostat alters key lymphocyte activation signaling pathways and is cytotoxic at concentrations much lower than those required for melanoma antitumor activity, resulting in an adverse therapeutic window.