Impact of individual factors and personality trait on psychological problems of family members living with staff of a COVID-19 frontline hospital: A cross-sectional self-administered anonymous questionnaire survey.

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the association between individual factors/personality traits and depression and anxiety in family members living with staff working on the frontline of COVID-19 care. Methods: The subjects were family members over the age of 15 years living with staff members of a COVID-19 frontline hospital. Between March 27 and April 11, 2021, 204 self-administered anonymous questionnaires were distributed, and 149 responses were received. Symptoms of depression and anxiety were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Personality trait was assessed using the Big Five personality traits, and fear of COVID-19 was assessed using the Fear of COVID-19 Scale. We examined associations between HADS depression or anxiety scores with individual background factors, scores of Big Five personality traits, and Fear of COVID-19 Scale. Results: The participants with anxiety had significantly higher scores for neuroticism and for the Fear of COVID-19 Scale. The participants with depression had significantly lower scores for extraversion and higher scores for the Fear of COVID-19 Scale. No individual background factors were significantly associated with HADS depression or anxiety scores. Conclusion: Among family members of staff of a COVID-19 frontline hospital, lower extraversion, higher neuroticism, and fear of COVID-19 were associated with anxiety and depression. This questionnaire survey was conducted before wide-spread rollout of COVID-19 vaccination, so the findings of this study are expected to be applicable to other future novel infectious outbreaks.

Psychological Distress Associated with Patient-Reported Outcomes in Preoperative Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of psychotic symptoms such as anxiety and fear in patients undergoing lumbar spinal canal stenosis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Recently, patients with spinal disorders have not only been evaluated objectively for their disease, but also for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including pain, physical function, and quality of life (PROs). Since depression has been previously associated with surgical outcomes, several studies have indicated that psychological problems may worsen the effects of pain and make treatment increasingly difficult. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted on 346 lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients who visited our hospital from 2010 to 2016. The content of the questionnaire included questions on PROs (Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire [JOABPEQ], Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Japanese version [RDQ], and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire [ZCQ]) and psychological evaluation (Self-rating Questionnaire of Depression, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20 [PASS-20], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Brief Scale for Psychiatric Problems in Orthopedic Patients). IBM SPSS Statistics (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, Mann-Whitney U-test, and multiple regression analysis were also performed. RESULTS: No significant correlations were found between psychological factors and PROs (r>0.4). However, patients with abnormal scores for preoperative psychological items on questionnaires other than the PASS-20 also had lower scores for lumbar spine dysfunction and social life dysfunction on the JOABPEQ subscales along with higher scores for the RDQ, symptom severity and physical function on the ZCQ compared to those with normal psychological scores (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative psychological factors in patients with LSS were associated with their RDQ, JOABEPQ, and ZCQ scores. These results suggest that factors such as catastrophic thoughts on pain, anxiety, depression, and fear that may affect the clinical outcomes in patients with LSS should be evaluated before surgery to facilitate psychological interventions.

A comparative study of 2-year follow-up outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with physical therapy alone and those with surgical intervention after less successful physical therapy.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of physical therapy for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has been reported only for the short term, and few reports have compared outcomes of surgical treatment with nonsurgical treatment after physical therapy. The purpose of this study was to assess 2-year outcomes of LSS patients treated with surgery or under follow-up observation after physical therapy for 6 weeks. METHODS: Patients presenting with neurogenic claudication, radiologically-confirmed central LSS affecting both legs and refractory symptoms to pharmacotherapy of more than 3 months were enrolled. Patients were treated with manual therapy, stretching and strengthening exercises, and body weight-supported treadmill walking once a week for 6 weeks. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), visual analog scale of low back pain, leg pain, and numbness, the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire and the SF-36. Two years after physical therapy, patients were classified into the observation group (Group I) or the surgery group (Group II), whose patients failed to respond to physical therapy and wanted to undergo surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled; 28 had complete data at 2 years: 21 and 7 in Groups I and II, respectively. Group II had a higher body mass index (BMI) than Group I. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes at baseline. Six weeks after physical therapy, Group I had significantly better outcomes for symptom severity and physical function on the ZCQ subscales, physical functioning and bodily pain on the SF-36 subscales. These outcomes in Group I were maintained or improved and did not differ significantly between groups at 2-years. However, the physical function on the ZCQ subscales was improved in Group II more than those in Group I (mean difference -0.6; 95% CI: -1.2 to -0.03, P < 0.05) at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: At 2 years, the outcomes except for the change in physical function score in the ZCQ subscale did not differ significantly between patients who had undergone surgery and those who avoided surgery.

Factors Associated with Neck and Shoulder Pain in Volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: The aims of the present study were 1) to examine the association between neck and shoulder pain (NSP) and lifestyle in the general population and 2) to examine if sagittal spino-pelvic malalignment is more prevalent in NSP. METHODS: A total of 107 volunteers (mean age, 64.5 years) were recruited in this study from listings of resident registrations in Kihoku region, Wakayama, Japan. Feeling pain or stiffness in the neck or shoulders was defined as an NSP. The items studied were: 1) the existence or lack of NSP and their severity (using VAS scale), 2) Short Form-36 (SF-36), 3) Self-Rating Questionnaire for Depression (SRQ-D), 4) Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), 5) a detailed history consisting of 5 domains as being relevant to the psychosocial situation of patients with chronic pain, 6) A VAS of pain and numbness to the arm, and from thoracic region to legs. The radiographic parameters evaluated were also measured. Participants with a VAS score of 40 mm or higher and less were divided into 2 groups. Association of SF-36, SRQ-D, and PCS with NSP were assessed using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: In terms of QoL, psychological assessment and a detailed history, bodily pain in SF-36, SRQ-D, and family stress were significantly associated with NSP. A VAS of pain and numbness to the arm, and from thoracic region to legs, was significantly associated with NSP. There were no statistical correlations between the VAS and radiographic parameters of the cervical spine. Among the whole spine sagittal measurements, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that sacral slope (SS) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were significantly associated with NSP. CONCLUSION: In this study, we showed the factors associated with NSP. Large SS and reduced SVA were significantly associated with NSP, while cervical spine measurements were not.

Gait abnormality due to spinal instability after lumbar facetectomy in the rat.

PURPOSE: Spinal instability of the lumbar spine causes various clinical symptoms. Among them, spinal instability is thought to contribute to low back pain, but the pathophysiological mechanisms are controversial. Although experimental animal models of spinal instability have been reported, it is unknown whether these models produce pain and whether spinal instability affects walking ability. We used the CatWalk system to investigate whether lumbar facetectomy causes gait abnormalities and low back pain. METHODS: Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three experimental groups. In the sham group, only the bilateral L4-L5 facet joints were exposed. In the experimental group, rats underwent complete resection of the bilateral L4-L5 facet joints without neural tissue injury. The control group comprised naïve rats. The CatWalk system was used to analyze gait in postoperative weeks 3, 4.5, 6, and 7. Radiological and histological analyses were also performed. RESULTS: At 7 weeks postoperatively, the rats in the experimental group showed the gait abnormalities seen in low back pain and neuropathic pain models. Radiological examination of the same rats revealed spinal instability with histological evidence of intervertebral disc degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that spinal instability and/or intervertebral disc degeneration induce gait abnormalities and low back pain. This experimental model may be useful for elucidating the mechanisms underlying clinical symptoms, such as low back pain, in patients with spinal instability.

Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes for lumbar spinal stenosis (≥3 levels) treated with posterior decompression without exposing the paravertebral muscles (PVM) with outcomes from surgery with PVM exposure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Exposure of the PVM can cause muscle injury and denervation, which may induce failed back syndrome. However, it is unknown whether lumbar spinal stenosis is more likely to lead to clinical improvement after PVM preservation than the procedure involving exposure of the PVM. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were divided on the basis of the timing of the surgery into 2 groups: modified split-spinous process laminotomy (Marmot operation) (MM) group (26 patients) and spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy through a unilateral approach (control) group (27 patients). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, visual analogue scale score of low back pain, and patients' satisfaction were assessed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Operation time, blood loss, and creatine phosphokinase and C-reactive protein levels were measured 7 days postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging changes in the PVM were evaluated at the follow-up. RESULTS: The preoperative visual analogue scale and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire scores did not differ between groups. The operation time did not differ between groups, but blood loss was less in the MM group than in the control group (129 vs. 205 mL) (P < 0.05). C-reactive protein (1.1 vs. 2.8 mg/dL) and creatine phosphokinase (68 vs. 253 IU/L) levels were lower in the MM group (P < 0.05). The visual analogue scale score for low back pain and patient satisfaction did not differ between groups. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire scores for pain-related disorders, gait disturbance, and social life disturbance improved significantly in the MM group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Nine patients in the control group showed positive changes in the PVM. CONCLUSION: The MM operation was less invasive and produced superior clinical outcomes compared with laminectomy involving exposure of the PVM.

Development of a new instrument for evaluating leg motions using acceleration sensors (II).

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of the average acceleration of elderly people during walking. METHOD: The subject cohort comprised nine men and 21 women aged ≥63 years. Subjects walked a 10-m straight course (walk test) which required stepping over six obstacles (hurdle walk test). The average acceleration was calculated from the accelerograms. Functional reach test scores and the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (TMIG) index of competence, fall risk assessment, fall experience within the last year, and carelessness were used as standard indices to estimate the dynamic postural movement and fall risk. RESULTS: The average acceleration during the walk test was not significantly correlated with the standard indices. The average accelerations at the lumbar and knee positions clustered with fall experience and carelessness, while those at the ankle and toe positions clustered with the hurdle walk test, TMIG index of competence, and fall risk assessment. Between the high- and low-risk groups classified by the conventional indices, there was a significant difference in the average acceleration at some measurement positions. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the possibility to discriminate the high-risk group according to the standard indices with average acceleration. CONCLUSIONS: The average acceleration during walking may be a composite index that encompasses standard indices and discriminate the high-risk group. As such, it may be a useful tool to estimate the dynamic postural movement and fall risk at all measurement positions.

Development of new instrument for evaluating leg motions using acceleration sensors.

The purpose of this study is to develop a new system for measuring leg motions using a portable three-dimensional accelerometer. The measuring system is composed of acceleration sensors (Micro Stone, MA3-10Ac), a data logger, a data reader, and a personal computer. The personal computer draws a graph of the acceleration of movements (i.e., accelerogram) from the output signals of the acceleration sensors. We then calculated the average acceleration to evaluate leg motions. We drew the accelerograms from 19 young subjects and 36 elderly subjects during the performance of physical fitness activities and walking. Different accelerograms were obtained from two subjects for different walking styles. The average accelerations at the lumbar, ankle and toe points were higher at all axes during movements from the physical fitness activities in the elderly subjects. The accelerations of leg motion at the knee point were, however, lower in the up and down axis in the elderly subjects than in the young subjects, although they were higher in the back and forth and the right and left axes. The new instrument has enabled us to evaluate leg motions by measuring three-dimensional acceleration during the performance of physical fitness activities and walking. The average accelerations of leg motions showed age-related changes. Thus, the average acceleration of leg motions may be used as a new index for evaluating leg motions at the dynamic state.